371 points

Yeah I really hope other car makers follow because I fucking hate touch controls in cars with a burning passion. It’s idiotic and not safe at all.

permalink
report
reply
202 points

Same goes for kitchens. Give me real buttons and knobs and not these abhorrent touch panels that refuse to work every third time. A good quality kitchen appliance is identified by high quality knobs that last for decades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
101 points
*

I pumped gas at a brand new Shell station over the weekend. The controls for the pump was one GIANT touchscreen (I’m talking probably 12 inches wide by 36 inches tall). It was fucking PAINFUL to use. Every touch took 2-3 seconds for the action to happen. Da fuck is wrong with a regular pump and regular buttons that just work!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
105 points

Because then they don’t have a display the size of a living room TV to shove ads in your face

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

It should be illegal to connect a touch screen to a computer that runs like a potato. Even computers in the 80s could respond to keystrokes and mouse clicks in real time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

In Canada it really sucks having to take your gloves off half the year. I hope this gets taken into account when touchscreens on gas pumps are considered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Your experience remembers me those old touch screen we had at the library in the 90s. The screen was monochrome, but touch sensitive. It took several seconds for react.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also it probably was crustier than a toddler’s iPad. 🤢

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What do you need a touchscreen for? You just take an appropriate pump (E95, Diesel), fill the fuel and pay at the register.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It was slow because all of the memory was allocated for the ads they show you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Biggest problem is that they cheap out on the tech parts. Nobody complains that an iPad has a touch screen, cause it works. But an appliance tends to have a crappy UI, running on a crappy touch screen, powered by a crappy CPU.

If they just used quality parts, it’d probably be fine, and the only issue would be expensive replacement for an entire assembly, instead of small, cheap parts that can be fixed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

A smartphone or tablet screen has the function to have multiple buttons and responsive functions on one and the same place.

A kitchen appliance doesn’t have or need that. Absolutely no need for digital or so-called “smart” gimmicks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

In general high quality things tend to have physical buttons and knobs as opposed to touch screen devices.

Instead of turning into e-waste after 5 years or less they can last for the next 30 to 50 years.

How many smart thermostats have become obsolete because their service providers stopped providing cloud services for them?

I just tore apart a working thermostat that almost 80 years old now (to understand how it works) and in perfectly working condition. It uses the physical properties of the materials inside to measure temperature (a coil of metal expands and contracts causing a pendulum to move clockwise or counterclockwise). Suspended at the top of this pendulum is a small vial of mercury containing two electrodes. When the pendulum is far enough counterclockwise the Mercury slides in the vial and bridges the electrodes, turning the furnace on, when the pendulum is far enough clockwise the mercury slides to the right and no longer bridges the electrodes.

When you set the temperature on the thermostat you are changing the default position of this pendulum. Meaning that it has to move more or less distance for the bead of mercury to bridge the circuit.

It’s brilliantly simple and will continue to work essentially forever. The physical characteristics of the materials involved won’t change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

How many smart thermostats have become obsolete because their service providers stopped providing cloud services for them?

Same goes for pretty much every IoT device that people seem to be filling their homes with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But it can’t run DOOM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You should read Exhalation by Ted Chaing if you haven’t already. It’s a quick read

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Touch screens especially don’t make sense in the cooking context, where your hands are likely to be wet / damp.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Touch controls for burners are very dangerous in my opinion. What if i spill oil on the stove and touch screen? Now the oil might stop me from turning off the heat and the situation could quickly turn into a fire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Omg I feel that. The oven in my apartment has touch controls. When I’m baking stuff with lots of moisture inside, water evaporates and is expelled though a vent JUST BELOW the touch controls. The condensation makes them completely unresponsive. Smh

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You have to wonder if the engineer who designed that was a complete dumbass because it seems remarkably obvious that you’d want to keep moisture away from electronics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I was boiling pasta earlier and my fucking stove turned itself off and engaged the child lock because water splashed onto those controls. THREE TIMES!

I’ve had this piece of shit literally ruin dinner before. It’s amazing how it can be both really nice and really fucking useless at the same time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Agreed, it’s true for most devices. They’re often finicky, don’t offer anything in terms of feedback (Except maybe for a beep that is identical for all button presses) and they don’t last.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m really on the fence when it comes to kitchens because a) you actually have time to look at what you’re doing – if you need to lower temperature suddenly the better option is to take your pan off the stove, anyway and b) touch controls are trivial to clean.

What I can’t stand though is scales manufactures being so cheap as to not even have capacitive buttons but re-use the front left/right feet as sensors for the interface. On the upside the thing was dirt cheap and actually comes with an USB-C port to charge its LIR2450 cell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nah I just got new ovens and a hob and they are sleek and easy clean and work like a charm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I like touch panels but don’t mind physical buttons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

It’s idiotic and not safe at all.

Not to mention completely useless in places where you need to wear gloves when driving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Volvo car touchscreens work with gloves on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-30 points

wear gloves when driving

For example?
If it’s so cold that you wear gloves, then get your AC fixed because it should’ve been running by the time you drive off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Hmm, that’s a strange comment you left. I’m not the person you responded to but:

When I get off work it’s just before dawn (coldest part of the day) and it’s frequently 10 Fahrenheit or lower in the winter (below freezing). I wear gloves in my car in the winter because cars don’t warm up enough for the heat to come on right away. I don’t want to walk through the cold into a cold car and grab a literal freezing steering wheel and hold on to it for 10 mins until the heat kicks on. My drive is about 35 min in good conditions.

I’m assuming you live in a warm place or don’t drive a car, good for you. Wish I had public transportation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My car takes 15 minutes to warm up enough for the heat to work at all let alone get the interior to a comfortable temperature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I got a new car two years ago, and physical buttons were one of the determining factors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
253 points

Good. Touchscreens are the most unsafe feature added to vehicles in decades. It’s honestly mind boggling how it was allowed in the first place.

permalink
report
reply
112 points

Easy, because regulations don’t mean anything anymore.

Headlights that blind you in the day and literally block all vision of the road at night, road legal trucks which bumpers that START at the hood of my car, all around limo tints on literally every car, people disabling their rear lights for some idiotic reason…

And that doesn’t even begin to mention the drivers themselves, so fucking self absorbed, tailgating, cutting you off for fun to get to the same light.

I’ve literally had a stream of cars going around me on street roads and so many dumbasses just follow the stream that I literally cannot safety accelerate because they’re all cutting me off bumper to bumper.

You should start carrying a gun if not already. The conservatives have successfully rotted western society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

While you have some good points, it seems you may be missing one in that if you are constantly getting passed in that manner, you are causing a problem, regardless of what is posted. Most western law systems have a provision against impeding the flow of traffic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Problem is when you get passed because other people aren’t driving legally. Even if it’s the flow of traffic, you’re still technically not allowed to break the law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Had me until the politics, but I agree. These fucking headlights nowadays are incredibly dangerous, especially on these lifted garage queens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The government has literally prevented cars that prevent you from blinding another car on the road from coming to the US market. Cars come in with active LED arrays and they have to be disabled to sell in the US.

https://www.newsweek.com/nhtsa-roadblocking-headlight-technology-that-could-save-lives-1811354

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Headlights that blind you in the day and literally block all vision of the road at night,

Illegal in the EU, Xenon and later LEDs always needed automatic height adjustment (it doesn’t suffice to do it once because cars change angles continuously). Lots has changed in the last 20+ years, though, speaking of VW: How about high beams all the time unless there’s something that could be blinded, then switch them off locally but keep the rest bright.

road legal trucks which bumpers that START at the hood of my car,

Like this?

all around limo tints on literally every car,

Illegal.

people disabling their rear lights for some idiotic reason…

Illegal.

And that doesn’t even begin to mention the drivers themselves, so fucking self absorbed, tailgating, cutting you off for fun to get to the same light.

See the thing is that if you build your infrastructure in a way that requires people to drive cars you can’t just take licenses away from asshats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

How about high beams all the time unless there’s something that could be blinded, then switch them off locally but keep the rest bright

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Headlights that blind you in the day and literally block all vision of the road at night, road legal trucks which bumpers that START at the hood of my car, all around limo tints on literally every car, people disabling their rear lights for some idiotic reason…

pretty sure all of those are illegal around here, with exception of the giant compensators.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

people disabling their rear lights for some idiotic reason…

That might be people with daytime running lights not turning on the lights. My car will turn on the headlights as soon as I take the parking break off (MT, an auto would likely do it when put in drive), but the dash and rear lights don’t turn on unless I turn the dial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It sounds like you too, might live in a heavily populated metropolitan area of Nevada, USA. Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They are a lot safer now that we have LKAS and ACC and FCW systems. But that’s moreso in spite of the touchscreens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
41 points

That’s not true though. This happened in their EVs regardless of price range. Even the Porsche Taycan which requires using a screen to adjust HVAC vents. Other than some steering wheel buttons the Taycan is all screens.

The Audi E-Tron GT (same chassis as the Taycan) oddly enough has more buttons. But that’s because VAG makes sure Porsche and Audi interiors are slightly different for different market segments.

It’s more about VAG thinking (like many automakers) copying the Tesla trend was what people wanted. The mistake made was not considering Tesla early adopters often being techy people who might not match broader market opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I, too, am guilty of vag thinking sometimes; but what does that have to do with Tesla or Volkswagen?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

VAG is common shorthanded for Volkswagen AG https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Group

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They also didn’t do it as well as Tesla which gave even more reason to dislike it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points

Replacing the buttons with a tablet has always been a cost saving measure on Tesla’s part that was marketed as “futuristic”, physical switches and dials made of plastic and metal as well as the underlying components will never be as cheap or as easy to wire as a simple touchscreen control. Other car companies followed suit, because Tesla made a method of reducing their own manufacturing costs hip, so many of them jumped on it.

But, Tesla tablets were designed with the belief that this cost saving is possible because of the delusion that full autonomous self driving is possible with existing hardware through software updates. When self driving didn’t happen after a decade of trying, people realized how inconvenient and dangerous it is that the only way to adjust the AC, stereo volume, and sideview mirrors while driving is through a tablet with no tactile feedback. So now, we are finally seeing that trend reversing.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Especially when the buttons move around in the GUI after an update so you accidentally press the wrong ones, or end up having to search the menus while driving.

Perhaps this could change when we have mainstream tactile displays, but until then buttons will always be better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I think using a car tablet is equally as dangerous as texting and driving. Voice control would actually be better for adjustments while driving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Realtime non-cloud voice control is still unreliable. Gonna be a while before that can replace physical buttons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Indeed and it seems attainable now, if it weren’t for the expensive hardware and massive energy required for general pre-trained transformers. Don’t want my car to call home just to run a neural network on Azure, it needs to run locally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I don’t think autonomous driving had anything to do with the initial choice. It might be a reason now, but I don’t think it was the initial driving factor.

You left off it being marketed as clean and minimalistic. I think that’s different enough from futuristic. Some people love that aspect, some outright hate it. (Edit and I mean this in a looks fashion, not a functionality one)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Also, Tesla’s button replacements actually do work more or less reliably. The other manufacturers decided to save money by adding a potato instead of a potent CPU that powers the screen in the middle of the console.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“Finally a use for all these leftover 1st gen Kindle Fire CPUs!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

In practice though Tesla has buttons for the controls you need while driving.

Cruise control/lane keeping/cancel is a lever

Indicators, flash high beams is a lever

Park is a button

Windscreen wiper single wipe is a button, same button is window wash

Set speed is a scroll wheel, volume is a scroll wheel (and a touch control on the passenger side)

Navigation is on screen keyboard, but you should stop to change navigation, or have a passenger do it

Climate control heats or cools towards your target temperature, heated seats and steering wheel are automatic or touch screen, but you know you need them before you get in the car

What more would you want physical controls for?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points

The fact that they needed to receive a lot of complaints to reconsider makes me wonder - do they even do any kind of usability testing for their products? Anyone who even sat in a car with only touchscreen can tell you the experience is not comfortable.

And I don’t think it’s just about the price of physical buttons. Buttons are a selling point right now, they could charge a small premium (not in the thousands but ~$200 certainly.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

Or follow the BMW plan and put buttons in the cars but make them subscription only.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Never read from a book that summons demons, even as a joke.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Never read from a book that summons demons

I know they said “What you do in High School will affect your entire life” but I didn’t think it would be this bad! It was only once! I swear!

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

It’s probably a cost issue. Running one wire harness to a touch screen is a lot cheaper than running a wire to every button in a car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

It’s also a “We can charge $900 for this $80 touchscreen when it fails in 5 years because your car is a brick without it” issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I hate the fact that you’re probably right about that reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I wonder if it’s a planning issue. Buttons you have to actually plan out. Touchscreen? Plop it in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You have the software design costs, which are high but one-off, so they’re amortised over the entire production - and it’s either the same or nearly the same across each brand’s entire range

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh they KNEW what they were doing and just didn’t give a fuck.

We need a People of Walmart equivalent for this bullshit. Start finding the designer/engineer/manager responsible for this garbage and shame them publicly.

How does this stuff pass any kind of Accessibility regs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Besides cost, we should probably at least entertain the idea that we are a vocal minority. I’d be completely unsurprised to find out that the majority of people hardly ever touch the controls that got moved to touchscreens and, if they do, they don’t really care - they can set them before they set off, or do it while driving and wobble all over the road, but hey everyone does it so what does it matter?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 551K

    Comments