Japan prepares regulation requiring Apple to allow sideloading::As the Digital Markets Act antitrust law passed in the European Union, Apple has until March 2024 to let users…

104 points

Having app developers be able to avoid Apples forced 30% fee is great. The fee is pure rent seeking masquerading as curation.

permalink
report
reply
46 points

30% might be a bit much, but Apple and Google are offering ongoing services for the price you pay as a developer. From hosting, to payment processing and APIs you can use in your apps, I think what they’re offering has some monetary value that would be acceptable if it wasn’t so damn much. I don’t think it’s toxic rent-seeking in and of itself. What’s pretty toxic is that there’s no way around those fees on Apple phones and tablets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Agreed, If it wasn’t a forced arrangement I wouldn’t necessarily nave a problem with the price

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The high price is a result of monopolistic exclusivity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I suspect you’re just repeating arguments you’ve heard, so don’t take this internet rage personally, but that is complete bullshit.

  • Hosting costs nothing. Devs will gladly foot the bill for that if given the option. Even if you distribute your apps on AWS (which is notorious for severely overcharging on egress), your expenses will be no where near 15%-30% of your revenue.

  • Payment processing is a competitive field outside the appstores. Even 15%-30% is ludicrous when “overpriced” processors like stripe charge 2%-3%

  • APIs are not something sold to developers. They build them as part of the operating system because they have to. That’s how it works. They could try selling licenses, but it would result in devs not building on their fancy new features.

(you didn’t mention the ones below, but people with your argument usually do, so I’m adding them for completeness)

  • Security is also bullshit. The Appstore and Play store are FILLED with malware. It is not physically possible to manually review the sheer volume of apps published to those stores. They also are not incentivized to improve the process much, because each time your kid or grandma accidentally activates a $40/week subscription, Apple/Google take a 15%-30% cut.

  • Curation/promotion is bullshit. Discoverability on these stores has always been bad, but has been particularly awful since both Apple/Google have started selling search ads in the store. The other day I almost accidentally downloaded a fake ChatGPT app because it was the first result when I searched, it had a very similar icon, “ChatGPT” in the name, 5 stars, and millions of downloads.

These stores also heavily incentivize devs to push subscriptions. I suspect (but haven’t confirmed) that the Appstore and Google Play both rank subscription based apps higher than others, and subs tend to pay a lower revshare fee than other monetization types.

I could go on all day about the rotten dumpster fires that are these disgusting stores. The only people who defend them are fanboys and people who have never actually had to deal with them professionally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Their curation is terrible too. The app store has so much shovelware crap

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

legislation is expected to be sent to parliament next year and focuses on four areas: app stores and payments, search, browsers, and operating systems.

We also get Linux on iPhones??

And the talk is just about sideloading… :-)

permalink
report
reply
35 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Wouldn’t putting Android on an iPhone be redundant? It would have less features and capability for a higher cost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not if the phone isn’t getting updates anymore or second-hand and the user doesn’t want to use iOS.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are you saying Android has less features and capabilities? Or am I reading it wrong?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I would assume it’s to use the chips but that only works if they’re forced to provide proper drivers for the full hardware

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Big if true. Apple owners might actually be owners of their devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

By and large, probably… But I don’t think it’s true for everyone.

As an iPad owner myself, I would love to ditch the OS! And I suppose alternative OSes would be pretty popular with the people jailbreaking their phones.

I don’t want to impose alternative OSes on others. I would just like the option for me!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Go see all the crazy kids on r/jailbreak asking the same questions over and over

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not true. I’d love to be able to jailbreak again. I’m locked in to the ecosystem by work and a backlog of apps 15 years deep.

Granted I’m on Lemmy so I guess I’m not a normal iOS user

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah it’s literally a status symbol amongst kids.

My kid is desperate for one but can’t give me a single compelling reason apart from they’re seen as cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

lol right

Good luck getting any of the hardware to work properly without Apple’s help.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s actually not that hard once you have access. ARM Chips can be difficult to get into, but programming for them is not that hard. The peripherals and other segments might be married components but that should be fine as long as they don’t get swapped out at any point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

Based Japan once again. I would love to see other countries requiring this too, but I’m not going to hold my breath unfortunately.

permalink
report
reply

I mean, the EU has already done this and now Japan is doing the same. So i guess it’s very well possible that other countries besides Japan will also follow suit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Hehe Brussels effect go brrrr

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think India and Brazil have also made initial efforts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

I tried to install an old version of San Andreas recently on my phone cause the last update broke controller support (which I actually bought with money).

Apparently we don’t own our Android OBB directories anymore because of “safety”.

So far the “we Android users already have this”…

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Yep, it’s unfortunate that manufacturers are taking more and more control away from users. That’s why open-source software like Linux is so important, you can do anything you want to with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Back in the old days, Android OS used to be Open Source. You can still get firmware built up from the last release, such as CalyxOS, but in order to install it you have to buy directly from Google with the Bootloader Unlocked as a feature.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not really. Fairphone also has the Bootloader unlocked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

God I miss the old days of android…the OG droid, everything was unlockable, no fuckery. Google hadn’t yet slowly started adding data collection by ways of slowing moving functionality away from the core AOSP.

It still is open source, btw. But they’re just intentionally choking it to death. They’ve recently announced they’re not going to maintain the open source PHONE APP…FOR THEIR PHONES…for christ sake. They’ve even had a new replacement OS in the works for a couple years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Yeah Android is Linux. But Manufactures are limiting it so hard that it is sometimes nearly impossible to get a custom ROM on the phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Yes. The openess of the operating system is meaningless if the phone’s firmware isn’t open.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Yeah but unfortunately with Android it’s what Google wants and not what the end-user wants. That’s why Linux itself is very important, the user gets to decide what they want to do with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

sideloading would be nice; i have no idea how people can get proper work done on an ipad as of now (especially with apple at one point acting like it was only a matter of time for them to replace laptops). everything is so overly glossy and surface level and designed for children or the elderly; you can’t actually DO anything!

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Even with side loading, you will still be pretty limited as the iPad is decently locked down. First of all it needs a decent window manager. That alone would go a long way.

But honestly, these things should be running full blown macOS when they are docked to a mouse and keyboard.

They had an 11” air at one point, so screen size can’t be the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This could be the real “pro” iPhone. Running m3, acting as a phone by itself and throwing a full macOS with Office and Adobe Cloud apps when docked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah! Even if not an m3, the chip in the 15 pro is good enough for most people. If you really need more power then, get an m3.

I’d love if my phone was my computer in that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yuh-huh! Just get a terminal emulator from the App Store. I will be just a few dollars a month. Then you can ssh into a Linux server you have somewhere.

See it’s an entire computer!

permalink
report
parent
reply

So a $1,200 thin client?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

No you do not get it.

At Apple we make magical devices that are unlike anything done before. We have truly revolutionized computing with over priced hardware.

If you don’t have a Mac then you are not cool and not good at your job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t take a laptop with me when I travel, because the iPad is more than enough for my work needs for a few days. Working with large spreadsheets is the only thing I absolutely need a computer for.

I have friends who are programmers and regularly work on just an iPad. As I understand it, they only need a computer for some more horsepower-hungry parts of their workflow.

The real problem with iPads is iPadOS. It’s intentionally gimped so you need a computer for some tasks. The iPad Pro has more than enough processing power and memory for full workloads (as well it should, given the price point), the OS is the restricting factor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My iPad has basically become a YouTube machine. There are no useful productivity features, no file manager, and no good games coming out that aren’t already on PC with mods.

Back in 2013 I loved my iPad, but now I’m thinking of just getting a surface

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What real work can even be done on any tablet that is not running desktop OS? I guess you could write stuff or edit spreadsheets, but that’s it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Write stuff” and “edit spreadsheets” covers 75% of corporate america.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 542K

    Comments