Japan prepares regulation requiring Apple to allow sideloading::As the Digital Markets Act antitrust law passed in the European Union, Apple has until March 2024 to let users…

26 points

Cool. This would be great. Hopefully a push to allow that in all other countries.

permalink
report
reply
-61 points

I was against sideloading, because I’m in it for the walled garden and if governments were to use their own stalls to publish their apps, then, actually it doesn’t matter anymore! Our gov apps still invasive anyway, imo.

For the clueless, the particular app scans your face with various coloured screens being blasted through the phone screen, doesn’t matter if you have face ID enabled or not, its their own scan.

Power to sideloading.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

You being paid by apple to fear monger about sideloading?

If you fear this, just leave the sideloading to others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

Wherever I ever see a comment complaining about sideloading, I just assume they’re an Apple financed marketing shill.

Even if they’re just a brainwashed moron, the argument is so stupid they deserve nothing but ridicule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

My biggest issue is cancelling recurring services. The Apple model requires that all your subscriptions appear on a pane of glass that you can notice if you signed up for a free trial and it’s been billing you $2.99/month because you wanted to read your kid Dr. Suess books on a flight when you were exhausted. Good luck figuring that out if you only have “$2.99 STRIPE BABELBOX INC” on your credit card bill.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Um, I said I believed before. I don’t believe it works anymore (walled garden). And that the government apps already doing this in the walled garden. Even said power to sideloading….

And I get downvoted to oblivion?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Probably also for the Q-Anon level lunacy with the government apps n stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Your initial comment makes very little sense ( to me anyway)

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

About 90% of my apps from fdroid. A Foss store that will do they’re best to ensure no anti or invasive features break through to my phone. I am certain that apple will have a similar store.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Yeah, I’ll even go as far as to say that because F-Droid apps are usually not for profit you get actually good apps without ads or trying to sell you anything.

They’re just an app that some dude found they needed and developed, and then made available for everyone else.

This is the most jarring difference I find when I go to the App Store, so a FOSS repository for iOS would be so huge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And I’m sure of that. Suffice to say it doesn’t matter because Apple’s walled garden allowed the Gov’s invasive app regardless.

Just to be clear: it doesn’t matter because the walled garden sucked and didn’t work and I don’t mind a third party store anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You guys downvoting me do realize that I’m fine with sideloading right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Your first sentence, after the comma, should say “because I was in it…”. That was a bit confusing.

And then you went completely off the rails with some colored light government conspiracy stuff.

So I think that’s causing the downvotes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
104 points

Having app developers be able to avoid Apples forced 30% fee is great. The fee is pure rent seeking masquerading as curation.

permalink
report
reply
46 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I suspect you’re just repeating arguments you’ve heard, so don’t take this internet rage personally, but that is complete bullshit.

  • Hosting costs nothing. Devs will gladly foot the bill for that if given the option. Even if you distribute your apps on AWS (which is notorious for severely overcharging on egress), your expenses will be no where near 15%-30% of your revenue.

  • Payment processing is a competitive field outside the appstores. Even 15%-30% is ludicrous when “overpriced” processors like stripe charge 2%-3%

  • APIs are not something sold to developers. They build them as part of the operating system because they have to. That’s how it works. They could try selling licenses, but it would result in devs not building on their fancy new features.

(you didn’t mention the ones below, but people with your argument usually do, so I’m adding them for completeness)

  • Security is also bullshit. The Appstore and Play store are FILLED with malware. It is not physically possible to manually review the sheer volume of apps published to those stores. They also are not incentivized to improve the process much, because each time your kid or grandma accidentally activates a $40/week subscription, Apple/Google take a 15%-30% cut.

  • Curation/promotion is bullshit. Discoverability on these stores has always been bad, but has been particularly awful since both Apple/Google have started selling search ads in the store. The other day I almost accidentally downloaded a fake ChatGPT app because it was the first result when I searched, it had a very similar icon, “ChatGPT” in the name, 5 stars, and millions of downloads.

These stores also heavily incentivize devs to push subscriptions. I suspect (but haven’t confirmed) that the Appstore and Google Play both rank subscription based apps higher than others, and subs tend to pay a lower revshare fee than other monetization types.

I could go on all day about the rotten dumpster fires that are these disgusting stores. The only people who defend them are fanboys and people who have never actually had to deal with them professionally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Agreed, If it wasn’t a forced arrangement I wouldn’t necessarily nave a problem with the price

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The high price is a result of monopolistic exclusivity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Their curation is terrible too. The app store has so much shovelware crap

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

sideloading would be nice; i have no idea how people can get proper work done on an ipad as of now (especially with apple at one point acting like it was only a matter of time for them to replace laptops). everything is so overly glossy and surface level and designed for children or the elderly; you can’t actually DO anything!

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Yuh-huh! Just get a terminal emulator from the App Store. I will be just a few dollars a month. Then you can ssh into a Linux server you have somewhere.

See it’s an entire computer!

permalink
report
parent
reply

So a $1,200 thin client?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

No you do not get it.

At Apple we make magical devices that are unlike anything done before. We have truly revolutionized computing with over priced hardware.

If you don’t have a Mac then you are not cool and not good at your job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Even with side loading, you will still be pretty limited as the iPad is decently locked down. First of all it needs a decent window manager. That alone would go a long way.

But honestly, these things should be running full blown macOS when they are docked to a mouse and keyboard.

They had an 11” air at one point, so screen size can’t be the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This could be the real “pro” iPhone. Running m3, acting as a phone by itself and throwing a full macOS with Office and Adobe Cloud apps when docked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah! Even if not an m3, the chip in the 15 pro is good enough for most people. If you really need more power then, get an m3.

I’d love if my phone was my computer in that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What real work can even be done on any tablet that is not running desktop OS? I guess you could write stuff or edit spreadsheets, but that’s it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Write stuff” and “edit spreadsheets” covers 75% of corporate america.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t take a laptop with me when I travel, because the iPad is more than enough for my work needs for a few days. Working with large spreadsheets is the only thing I absolutely need a computer for.

I have friends who are programmers and regularly work on just an iPad. As I understand it, they only need a computer for some more horsepower-hungry parts of their workflow.

The real problem with iPads is iPadOS. It’s intentionally gimped so you need a computer for some tasks. The iPad Pro has more than enough processing power and memory for full workloads (as well it should, given the price point), the OS is the restricting factor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My iPad has basically become a YouTube machine. There are no useful productivity features, no file manager, and no good games coming out that aren’t already on PC with mods.

Back in 2013 I loved my iPad, but now I’m thinking of just getting a surface

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

legislation is expected to be sent to parliament next year and focuses on four areas: app stores and payments, search, browsers, and operating systems.

We also get Linux on iPhones??

And the talk is just about sideloading… :-)

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Big if true. Apple owners might actually be owners of their devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah it’s literally a status symbol amongst kids.

My kid is desperate for one but can’t give me a single compelling reason apart from they’re seen as cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Go see all the crazy kids on r/jailbreak asking the same questions over and over

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not true. I’d love to be able to jailbreak again. I’m locked in to the ecosystem by work and a backlog of apps 15 years deep.

Granted I’m on Lemmy so I guess I’m not a normal iOS user

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Wouldn’t putting Android on an iPhone be redundant? It would have less features and capability for a higher cost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are you saying Android has less features and capabilities? Or am I reading it wrong?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not if the phone isn’t getting updates anymore or second-hand and the user doesn’t want to use iOS.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I would assume it’s to use the chips but that only works if they’re forced to provide proper drivers for the full hardware

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

lol right

Good luck getting any of the hardware to work properly without Apple’s help.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s actually not that hard once you have access. ARM Chips can be difficult to get into, but programming for them is not that hard. The peripherals and other segments might be married components but that should be fine as long as they don’t get swapped out at any point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 544K

    Comments