Original toot in Spanish says: “OK, so I need some alternatives to Google Maps, because I just decided seconds ago to stop using it after I got proposed a trip with a completely unnecessary detour which adds two extra minutes just because it pass by a gas station that sponsors this trip.”

178 points

The picture suggests that there was an ad that suggested a stop at the sponsored gas station, if the user clicked on the suggestion / ad, then the route would be modified.

IMO that’s massively different than the detour being added by default. If they actually did / were doing that, it would be a huge scandal, but I don’t think that’s what’s happening here. Instead, it’s just an intrusive, annoying ad.

permalink
report
reply
64 points

Your story doesn’t drive clicks though…

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Damn monetization of *checks notes* Mastodon and Lemmy! Those communists are ruining everything!

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yeah, about 0% richer now compared with yesterday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

You’re right that this is not generating monetary gains

But it’s generating outrage towards Google when what you accuse them of doing isn’t the reality, that’s pretty disingenuous

Not defending Google as a whole, but let’s keep honest about the current developments

The day sponsored trips are the default is the day I’m dropping Maps

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Here’s some Lemmy gold 🏆

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Might be. It’s indeed hard to tell by the picture, but the user seems to knows the place so I don’t know. What seems about right is the title is misleading so I’m going to change it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The picture shows the “eco” route which is a setting you can turn on/off that selects gas saving routes even if they add some minutes to the trip

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Please change “added a sponsored detour” to “proposed a sponsored detour” and it won’t be as misleading anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks for the proposal!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thanks for doing that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

Anyone seen this? One post from one user with no verification behind it seems like nothing to get upset over.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I have experienced something really similar. Not a detour, but, well…

In early 2019 (or maybe late 2018), whenever I used google maps and the route took me over on a certain stretch road, it would announce the location of an Auto Zone regardless of bearing on the route.
It was just a straight section of road with no confusing areas that needed any clarification. Yet the navigation voice would announce “In a quarter mile, continue past the Auto Zone” followed by “Continue past the Auto Zone on the right.” (Or left.)

It was so jarring and offensive that I also wanted to stop using Google Maps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It does that because it thinks there’s a bend in the road or some silly shit. Mine tells me to turn after the Taco Bell into a place because the turn in isn’t a named road. I don’t think it’s trying to advertise to me. That’s just where the turn is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not convinced.

.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nope, but I did move from Waze to Google Maps and now settled on Apple Maps because of increasing enshittification and ad bloat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ah, good choice - instead of waiting for the company to become increasingly enshittified, you went with the already 100% completely shit company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Guys, try some OpenStreetMap-based alternatives and get rid of Google Maps:

https://organicmaps.app/

https://osmand.net/

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I tried OsmAnd, but sometimes when I try to set a course I get a message that the destination is not reachable… And honestly, the pathfinding is not great on those. I hate to like Maps’ algorithm, but I do think it’s way better than the alternatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

last time I tried to use it on a 700km trip it would not even find the path, it would just calculate seemingly forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You need to download the maps in order to make it work. The default maps it comes with kinda suck. It’s not intuitive but I was able to go from California to Wyoming that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, I’ve seen this sometimes, which lead me to create a osm account and improve coverage around my zone.

OSM is a collaborative effort done by volunteers, so it might not be perfect in some places.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I’m right there with you. And finding addresses is useless… I have used magicearth for over a year and it’s solid. Not open source but respectful privacy policy

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The one big draw of Google maps for me is the real-time traffic info. I don’t think that anything else had the ability to gather the same amount of info (except maybe Apple?)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Waze. Google Maps literally gathers a large part of it’s traffic real time data from Waze (which they also own).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Maybe, but I suspect that Waze has a small fraction of the gmaps user base, so if it has compatible traffic info, it’s because it draws on Google’s data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I like osmand for off-grid motorcycle type stuff but I’ve found it to be somewhat useless for final mile navigation especially ironically in the city. I still use it as it’s awesome and allows pre-planned offline routes but I also still use gmaps as well. When I drove trucks for a living I found that the Garmin (truck specific but buy what you need) GPS to be quite amazing and will probably buy one of those for my car someday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Does organic maps work without downloading maps? I don’t really need nav, but sometimes I need to know how to get somewhere. I can’t do that with Osmand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do they work with Android Auto?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Both great ideas but they’re not available to android auto, I’d need an alternative that can load in android auto

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Google surely cannot be that stupid. Early Aprils fools joke I presume.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

I bet they can, and are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The enshitification continues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Given enough money, they’ll do anything

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They already have sponsored location pins for retail stores. Even if I don’t have a route active it shows me icons on the map for Chick-Fil-A and some outfit called “Homesense” I’ve never heard of before even though I never asked it to. Even if I’m zoomed out far enough that it’s not showing me POI pins for any other businesses I still see these. And they’re actual icons of the store’s logo, not just the usual generic fork-and-knife or shopping cart pins like other businesses get. So I guarantee you they’re getting paid to do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Have you tried google search lately? It’s become borderline retarded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is literally one of a handful of times in my life where I will begrudgingly accept that word.

It doesn’t make me proud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d give a hand for your optimism…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Interestingly 28th Dec is el Día de los inocentes in Spain, their equivalent of April Fools, so it’s possible it’s that

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Even if this isn’t true, as some here suggest, it still points to an idea that might or might not come to Google Maps in the future. What would prevent them from suggesting multiple routes, where the first route is an advertised one, and we’d have to explicitly scroll a few pixels down to get to the non-advertised one. It’s the same with the Google search results.

So, we should really think of an alternative before it’s too late.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I’ve noticed Waze (owned by Google) sometimes suggests a route I don’t feel like (eg I’m on the highway and not in a rush so I don’t feel like taking an exit Waze suggests), but when I ignore it and it recalculates, the estimated time goes down.

On the one hand, I know that it has to explore the alternative routes from time to time to know which ones are fastest and that if it’s directing a sufficient portion of the overall flow, it has to use multiple routes or else any single route it suggests will become bogged down with too much traffic, but I gotta wonder if there’s other motivations, especially when it’s a highway exit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Does waze have a fuel saving mode? It might be sending you down an exit because the route uses less fuel. I doubt waze and google maps has enough users to cause too much traffic. Surely most people drive familiar routes. I could be wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If they can’t monetize, they drop. In business terms that makes sense. No profit? Stop the bleeding.

In a wider sense though, Google has done a tremendous job at showing me I can’t rely on them for almost anything. I’ve begun moving email, search, browser, cloud storage… Within a few months Android Auto will be the only thing I can’t undo, except to use my car’s nav. Maybe I’ll do that too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How has your email transition been? I have been moving away from Google slowly for a few years/intentionally avoiding onboarding with Google services. I don’t use Chrome, no google search, haven’t used messenger ever, that sort of thing.

But moving away from Gmail is hard. Would love your thoughts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What makes you think non-sponsored routes will even be available then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

IMO this is the main take.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments