2 points

US Intelligence Propagandists

permalink
report
reply
2 points

It’s sad the New York Times has fully turned into a Zionist propaganda outlet the last few days.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Well they go back and forth. They have demanded better evidence before and here they do point out that this isn’t that evidence. It’s just a declassified document saying we officially believe the IDF. Which isn’t really new.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

So funny seeing people here react to any news regarding Israel and Gaza. Bomb falls in parking lot of a hospital, Hamas says 20 minutes later 500 dead, everyone believes the and it takes weeks to disprove their claim and bunch of sources to analyze and report on their findings. Any non-Hamas source says terrorists are using terrorist tactics… entire lemmy goes: fake, discredited, Israel ally is lying for them, etc.

And down-votes that are coming on this comment just go to prove how big of a supported to terrorism people here are.

permalink
report
reply

entire lemmy

Different people are saying different things. Stop clumping everyone together. Lemmy isn’t a monolith.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

My issue is that on the (?second) day of the war, a group of Western reporters were presented with “evidence” of the planning that had gone into the attack, and I found the “evidence” to be laughably bad - the evidence itself, the supposed circumstances it was found under, the condition of the evidence - all were bad. And if you present such incredibly poor “evidence” at one point, I’m going to automatically be much more suspicious of any other “evidence” you present later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My issue is more with people supporting a genocide because Hamas exists.

Few people have a problem condemning Hamas, but when Israel is clearly killing far more civilians and bombing more hospitals than Israel, obsessing about the lesser problem (who were Israel-funded in any case) is deeply suspicious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

On no account should any genocide be tolerated or supported. Am merely pointing out how differently people react on different kind of news. Not to mention how frequently people confuse Palestinian cause with Hamas cause.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Then why do you need to construct strawmen?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

“Terrorists” is the 21st century equivalent to “savages” to justify imperialism and genocide. US propagandists can stfu.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Call it what you like. The fact is they hid behind civilians, kidnapped other civilians and tortured them. Or is cutting off womb of a pregnant woman with baby still moving in her now not savage because we don’t want to identify with US?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Got other made up stories? Time and time again has shown that every single thing that comes out of the mouths of US and Israeli politicians is a lie unless proven otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You have one downvote. From me. And yeah if you’re going to bomb a protected target we’re going to want to see the evidence. You don’t just get to shrug and mumble something about terrorists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Protected by whom? International rules of war which were never respected in the first place?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

So far, you’ve characterised support for a group that’s being genocided as supporting terrorists, and made it clear you don’t care about warcrimes. You’ve implied you care about hospitals being bombed, but that doesn’t seem to apply when the bombing is done by the group bombing the majority of the hospitals.

You need to stop and ask yourself if you’re backing the bad guys, my guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

U.S. Intelligence Says

permalink
report
reply
11 points

The actual news here is the declassified document. Which according to the article is just a note saying we believe the IDF.

Yup totally confidence inspiring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

While the spy agencies provided no visual evidence, a U.S. official said they were confident in their assessment because it was based on information collected by Israel and America’s own intelligence, gathered independently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Anybody find those WMDs yet?

I have nothing but respect for the analysts in the intelligence community. But I’ve seen what leadership does with their reports.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Bombed UN facilities in Gaza was used by Hamas as counterfeit olive oil factories, U.S. Intelligence Says

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lol what does this matter?

Israel committed so much more heinous atrocities I honestly give no fuck that an oppressed people have a terrorist group lashing out using a hospital as a base.

Israel lied about the sexual assault and baby mutilations, they are ar performing genocide and they’ve oppressed these people for generations.

Fuck Israel

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

It matters because one of the charges leveled against Israel is that they bombed a hospital just to genocide Palestinian babies. Clearly, Hamas was using said babies as human shields, which is a war crime. Now the shoe is on the other foot and Hamas apologists don’t like it, so now you just say it doesn’t matter, lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nope the shoe literally cannot be on the other foot.

Israel funded Hamas.

Israel has developed this culture in Gaza because of the treatment of Palestinians.

Israel has far more money and resources.

So the instigator with more money/power in the situation causing a genocide after decades of racial abuse gets no pass that shoe cannot go anywhere else

All of Hamas’ actions are only happening because of Israel. Sorry

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

It’s probably true that Netanyahu funded Hamas for cynical reasons. The Israeli right-wing coalition definitely needs to go. But you can’t justify Hamas terrorism againsr civilians because the Palestinian people are angry and oppressed. Hamas has agency. They aren’t some inexorable force of history. They choose to be terrorists. Hamas was already a radical terrorist organization in its own right, and was duly elected by the people of Gaza as such. Fuck those raping terrorists.

All this back-and-forth revenge is, of course, just a vicious cycle and shouldn’t continue. But I am a little tired of this faulty reasoning that Israel is the bad guy just because they are more powerful. Palestinians and Israelis have both done things to provoke violence and both sides have, at various times, rejected peace and compromise. But Hamas is unambiguously a terrorist group that stokes division and whose sole purpose is to eliminate Israel. Hamas is a barrier to peace and will get no sympathy from me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

honestly give no fuck that an oppressed people have a terrorist group lashing out using a hospital as a base.

You’re rooting for terrorists operating from hospitals.

I am in shock that you think this is defensible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They’re not rooting for the terrorists. When is rooting the same as not giving a fuck?

I think they’re saying that Israel has gone so far overboard that they can’t find a good enough excuse to justify their actions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You’re rooting for terrorists performing genocide

If my two options are terrorists doing a genocide and terrorists doing a war crime (because of you know the genocide they’re facing and decades of oppression)

It easily makes sense why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

You’re rooting for terrorists performing genocide

I don’t support Hamas, the only group actively and openly pursuing genocide in this conflict.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 369K

    Comments