The cause was easy enough to identify: Data parsed by Kuhls and her colleagues showed that drivers were speeding more, on highways and on surface streets, and plowing through intersections with an alarming frequency. Conversely, seatbelt use was down, resulting in thousands of injuries to unrestrained drivers and passengers. After a decade of steady decline, intoxicated-driving arrests had rebounded to near historic highs.

… The relationship between car size and injury rates is still being studied, but early research on the American appetite for horizon-blotting machinery points in precisely the direction you’d expect: The bigger the vehicle, the less visibility it affords, and the more destruction it can wreak.

95 points

Just my own experience and maybe due to frequency bias, but holy shit everyone seemed to lose their goddamn minds behind the wheel after Covid.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

People seem to have gone “feral”.

Animals in the store?

No shoes/shirt?

Waiting your turn?

Treating other people (especially service workers)?

Nope. Just a feral return to “mine mine mine, me me me”

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Yup. Everyone realized social norms/good behavior, was just a social shared agreement. If you opt out, and shit on the floor, it’s the other person’s fault for caring

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

People are the same as they have ever been, the US is just genuinely entering a state of collapse and people are more desperate and less able to cope with side quests in life that demand them to be kind and patient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

And I swear SOOOO many fucking people on their phones. Bitch, you aren’t that important. Put it the fuck down and drive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Former firefighter: COVID didn’t start that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That is not new tho. People now watching tv shows while driving is pretty new. And i assume people who do that are also on their phones at the same time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We just got phone enforcement cameras, they’re cantilevered over the lanes

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Yes! A TON of people have brain damage from COVID and have no idea they have brain damage from COVID.
https://twitter.com/yash25571056/status/1745048307335119358

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

80% of infected individuals have suffered neurological symptoms probably shouldn’t equate with 100% of those who experienced symptoms were found to have permanent brain damage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

A lot of people only go the speed limit because there are cars in the way

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Apparently i’m a lot of people

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Some of them really really don’t like that at all

It works though

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yes. Covid unleashed a lot of people’s inner narcissism. Bunch of fucking me-mes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points

I dunno but can we turn down the brightness on some of these fucking headlights

permalink
report
reply
33 points

They need to mandate that headlights cannot be installed > 2-2.5 feet off the ground. Putting them higher than that does not benefit you in any way, it just fucks with other drivers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

If an 18 wheeled transport truck can have lights mounted at a reasonable height and brightness, so can your f150 or chevy Suburban.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Exactly, practically every semi has its headlights mounted just above the bumper. People saying “it’s the angle that matters” don’t understand that if you’re in a small car you’re getting blinded from both directions regardless of how the lights are angled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The height doesn’t matter nearly as much as the angle they are pointing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

There are already rules about where they may point (for road legal lights, anyway) you shouldn’t get dipped headlights in your mirror or from oncoming traffic except briefly as they crest hills

The height is a problem as when a large vehicle is tailgating you the angle doesn’t matter much

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If the headlights are higher than another driver’s eyes, the light will go straight and downward into their eyes. There’s just no way to highlight the ground without blinding drivers in front of you if the headlights are so high.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

These aren’t people that want to hear logic, they want to whine about people that can afford these stupid trucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

It absolutely does improve visibility, but obviously impacts others

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

No joke, my MIL hit a dear the other day because she couldn’t see it due to a truck blinding her as it drove the opposite direction. Luckily she was only going 30 so the damage was minimal but it’s crazy they are allowed to blind drivers like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

With you on that.

I live in a rural area with no street lights, and a lot of these redneck asshole trucks have two sets of headlights vertically, guaranteeing that you will be blinded

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I’m pretty biased on this one but I’ve been pretty outspoken that we print too god damn many driver’s licenses.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

For the most part, it has nothing to do with people’s general driving competency. It has to do with their anger issues. People really just don’t care about others anymore. Defensive driving is virtually nonexistent for the majority of drivers, because everyone’s mentality is entirely selfish. Most days, many people are just giving in to their rage. And it’s not just behind the wheel either. All aspects of life are being swallowed by people’s indifference and anger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Someone I knew got their license as an adult recently, and they were terrified at the lack of an actual “test” in the driving test. They drove around the block, never got above 35mph, and encountered a couple other cars.

And once you pass that, as long as you renew it and don’t have any violations, you can drive until you can’t see the gauges or hold the steering wheel.

We should have driving tests like the Finns have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think the problem lies more in initial training and retesting. There is very little mandated training for a task as complex as driving and most training is done on open streets, not under controlled conditions with professional supervision. Furthermore, once you get the lisence, you got it for life just keep paying the fees. No need to retest regardless how the rules of the road change, street design changes, and car technology changes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I agree for the most part but there is something to be said for the fact that controlled training is never really going to cover all of the details of real world situations. Put simply, a newly licensed driver is always going to suck until they get on the road experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

In my city, police have pretty much given up on doing any traffic enforcement.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

same, why? i didnt see any cops during xmas new year, then this morning i see 3 highway patrols, probably on their way to an accident

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Quiet quitting after Floyd protests hurt their feelings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

in nsw australia… yeah man sure

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Same in mine, in Canberra, Australia. Maybe I’m just not driving at the times they’re doing drink driving enforcement. I recall when I was a youth the breathalyzers were set up randomly midnight to 4am

We do have camera enforcement of speed, red lights, and mobile phones

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’d prefer breathalyzers between 6 and midnight

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

My city definitely did breath testers for people coming home from work in the past

And the place does them well when they do them out of peak hour — they stop all traffic on a major road, test people, arrest them or let them continue

In peak hour they pull over cars they’re suspicious of. Driving badly, young drivers, etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I saw a police pulling radar in a school zone right around when the kids get let out. Everyone still did 15 over the limit and the officer didn’t pull anyone. I’m sure they pulled people speeding faster than that but it seems they can’t just ticket the entire town when 10-15 over the limit is so normalized. People still tell me all the time a cop isn’t even allowed to pull you for just 10 over (which is false).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

… Don’t you guys have speeding cameras? As in, you drive by too fast, it snaps a pic of your license plate and after a couple of weeks you get mail saying “surprise, bitch! Here’s a picture of you speeding. That’ll be $400 or you’re going to jail :)”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Im just starting to see some of them but they all have warning signs before hand. We have a similar thing where your speed flashes on a lighted sign if it clocks you too fast, but since they aren’t enforced by anything the act more like a high score meter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I have seen mobile speed cameras and cops with radar guns in school zones in wealthier parts of my town, and they pull over anyone more than 2kph over the limit

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wish I could say I’ve seen the same. I find it rare for people to do any less than 5 over in a school zone. The particular instance above was also influenced by the fact there is a highway entrance/exit about 1 km up the road from the school zone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m not saying it’s the reason, but as soon as they do and the perp wrecks and kills themselves they have dipshits online whingeing about how the poor kid of only 24 didn’t deserve to die for simply speeding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So its better to just let them keep speeding and wait until they kill or injure someone else rather than themselves? Does that really sound more fair? Many police departments will stop the chase if traffic is too heavy to safely pursue. The cops shouldn’t shoot the speeder but it’s defintely not on the cops if the speeder disobeys traffic laws, refuses to pull over, and attempts to evade police resulting in a collision/personal injury.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree with you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

It’s because we have so many entitled morons on the road, and we’re all stressed over the worsening human condition.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

And because the roads are not designed to keep traffic at safe speeds, and don’t separate traffic from pedestrians and cyclists sufficiently, when those morons do something moronic they kill someone

Infrastructure can fix a lot of this problem - Australia is like mini-America in so many ways, but we allow speed cameras and red light cameras which reduce speeding marvelously, though I have been tailgated by someone offended I was only going 80km/h* in the 80 zone. They passed me illegally and unsafely

Even the fixed cameras do good work, even when everyone knows where they are as it’s hard to speed right after them as slow cars move into the fast lane to pass glacial traffic

I point at the bike I ride as a reason cars give me space, it’s a carbon fibre recumbent. Since it looks odd, people see it. But the bike lane is protected by paint on the route I mostly ride, and one driver was so busy looking at my odd bike that they went out of their lane into the bike lane. Luckily there was no cyclist just that distance in front of me - that’s a pretty regular person, driving mostly safely, but screwing up. If the bike lane was protected by a kerb the car would’ve been deflected.

*I calibrate my speedometer to GPS speed, so it’s accurate

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Here in Canada I’ve noticed we are starting to use cameras as well, the only issue is there are lots of signs before it is installed and lots of signs when it is installed. That way you know where you can speed and where you can’t speed, which is usually just 1 or 2 intersections of cameras… It seems like a small improvement but they are too easy to avoid, especially for locals. Imagine if a traffic cop had to walk down the road and put a little sign up that says “radar trap ahead” before doing any radar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

My town has mitigated that problem by putting a mobile camera just after the fixed camera. The sign for the mobile camera is hidden by the slow traffic, but they catch all the people who speed up just after the fixed camera

People are now afraid of speeding anywhere around the cameras

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuckcars@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let’s explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don’t discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don’t follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don’t doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

  • [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
  • [article] for news articles
  • [blog] for any blog-style content
  • [video] for video resources
  • [academic] for academic studies and sources
  • [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
  • [meme] for memes
  • [image] for any non-meme images
  • [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments