68 points

Doesn’t matter. Websites will break on the rest of the browsers. Users will complain. All browsers now have Web DRM

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Or web site owners that use it will go out of business because people don’t want to change their browsers. The companies will realize their decision was bad when all of a sudden their customers stop coming to their sites.

Google needs shut down! Or at least go back to being a search engine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I doubt that but website owners that implement it might receive enough death threads to reconsider I guess, it’s the internet after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I’m not recommending death threats, but maybe hit them wheee it really hurts. Everyone quit using the internet for a week or two. And I do mean everyone around the world. Hell we survived quite well without the internet until the late 80’s, we have the knowledge, so let’s use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

The chance that happens when google is the most used is pretty small

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unfortunately

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The chance of that happening when large corporations, banks, etc. start rolling this out…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We need some new Anti-Monopoly governments to come into power and take a hatchet and machete to google and carve it up, and learn from the ATT/Ma Bell situation by making it so the richest fragment cant buy up all the remaining fragments after a couple decades and go all T2000 on the situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t see that too soon, big companies control the government. Unless that can be stopped, which it won’t, the little guy is going to continue to be screwed in the advancement of capitalism

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Or someone will somehow create a new web browser or add-on or just another branch of Chromium that fakes out the DRM somehow.

Like with ReVanced, for example. It’s a modified version of the YouTube app with an adblocker and several other bells and whistles added on (and the ability to remove a lot of Google’s own bells and whistles).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The best thing that could happen is google get shut down at this point

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
3 points

And 90% of them complain about privacy invasions by big tech or lack of anonymity

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Call me when Safari weighs in with their 20% share. That’s a big enough group to actually kill this effort outright.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The effect those people will have on profit margins probably are negligible, given the large amount of people using Google-created web browsers already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Unfortunately you’re probably right. Vivaldi has already said they will likely adopt this standard despite them disagreeing with it, I assume the same will happen to Firefox and Brave if the standard becomes widely adopted and used enough. Its not an easy issue to tackle. The good thing is we can fight back and push its adoption back as far as possible, as well as just avoiding and boycotting any websites that adopt the standard. I don’t know if the push back will be big enough to make an impact, but we at least have to try and do what we can.

We’ve already seen DRM garbage added to nearly every browser for media playback, despite massive backlash and concerns from organizations like the EFF. Mozilla didn’t want to adopt it iirc but they caved in to not lose market share and adopted it in the most user friendly and secure/privacy respective way that they could (Restricting the DRM in its own sandbox), so I could see something like that happen again unfortunately. However to be fair, this new Google DRM standard will be significantly worse and more of a problem than that DRM implementation, as this effects entire websites themselves now and is on a whole new scale and precedent, and not just for certain media content, so hopefully more can be done to prevent this and fight back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Vivaldi has no choice. They have built their browser on Blink, which is made by Google. Google will force them to comply. Their way out would be to go back to the Opera web browser, which they gave up on over a decade ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Brave is also built on Chromium and they won’t be adding support for the API.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I wonder if there can be any anti-monopoly law suits involved if Google just starts implementing drm on its websites and products without other browsers agreeing to implement it. Sounds a lot like “use chrome, or else.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

This will go through. Firefox already caved on the video/audio DRM last time, and even if they don’t, people will just switch browsers. The only thing that could do anything about this are powerful governments and maybe Apple. But Google has bribed all of Washington and half of Brussels at this point, and I imagine the press actually likes the idea of putting DRM on their shitty websites, so they won’t make a big stink I don’t think, even though they beef with Google. If Apple actually drags their feet I’m sure Google can bribe them.

permalink
report
reply
62 points

Mozilla:

Mozilla opposes this proposal…

I wish they took a stronger stance like Brave:

We won’t be shipping WEI support

C’mon Mozilla, show some gonads.

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

They have the same stance. Mozilla just won’t implement it.

Brave needs to make it known they won’t ship it because their browser is based on Chromium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Mozilla is funded by Google, they’re pretty good at just opposing them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
116 points

Well, that’s nearly 3% of the market.

Google’s plan is foiled once again.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

It’s about 10%. Still not a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Of desktop, maybe.

Overall (and like 60% of all browsing is now mobile), no way. Mobile is where alternative browsers really suffer. Firefox actually seems OK for Android but it’s not quite as slick on many sites, probably due to them targeting Chrome. Apple force Safari on you so you can’t use Firefox at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You can use Firefox on iphones

Edit: you can, but not really

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Apple are the only other ones big enough to throw their weight around. Hopefully they join in.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Oh, but they already did join in, google that is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I always say that Apple’s biggest success is somehow convincing people that they’re pro-consumer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Imagine Microsoft saying fuck Google, Internet Explorer is back, boys!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That would be so glorious I would install and daily drive it on Linux

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

With added trust(telemetry) of Microsoft

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Finally, an easier target to defeat!

Open Web Revolution 2 lets gooo

permalink
report
parent
reply

Firefox

!firefox@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 887

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments

Community moderators