cross-posted from: https://kbin.projectsegfau.lt/m/tech@kbin.social/t/26889

Google just announced that all RCS conversations in Messages are now fully end-to-end encrypted, even in group chats. RCS stands for Rich Communication Services and is replacing traditional text and picture messaging, providing you with more dynamic and secure features. With RCS enabled, you can share high-res photos and videos, see typing indicators for your…

121 points

Fun fact, a group I knew in uni made an end to end encryption program that sent messages through Google more than a decade ago and Google got really, really mad at them threatening to shut down all Google accounts associated with all IP addresses they used.

Guarantee it’s not fully E2E.

permalink
report
reply
126 points

It’s E2E, E2E isn’t really something you can be sneaky about unless you roll your own encryption and then make claims about it totally being safe bro

They, however, run the app you are using to type everything, the keyboard you are using to type everything and the os you are using to type everything. If they want something, they don’t need to look at your in flight messages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

The trust doesn’t even have to be in the encryption, they could very well use the same signal protocol. They would only need a copy of the keys you are using and you wouldn’t even know… That’s the problem with closed source programs, there is no certainty that its not happening (and I’m not saying it is, I can’t prove it, obviously, but the doubt remains, we need to trust these companies not to screw us over and they don’t really have the best track record in that…)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-27 points

As if you’re any more comfortable with open source software, actively vetting the code, building it yourself, running your own server.

For all you know, Signal keeps a copy of your keys, too. And happily decrypts everything you send and sells it to russian data brokers for re-sale to advertisers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

They can… everything is closed there. It can just be “encrypted” for your eyes

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s E2E, E2E isn’t really something you can be sneaky about unless you roll your own encryption and then make claims about it totally being safe bro

With a closed source app? Of course you can. How is anyone supposed to know what keys you use for encryption? Doesn’t even need to be a remote one - just the key generation be reproducible by the developer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know if you’re understanding that that’s his point.

If Google can reproduce the key it’s not fully “end to end” unless one of the "end"s is Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I know they have unencrypted versions from my phone because my tablet and desktop version of messages seamlessly connects to the chat. So it’s probably be E2E in transit alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

It doesn’t matter if it’s E2E or not when Google can spy on you directly on the phones at either end.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Sent messages “through Google”? Like Chat? Email? That’s such an ambiguous statement.

E2EE has been a available approaching three years now. I’d imagine if they were lying and defrauding the population, someone would have found out by now. This announcement is just that it’s on by default for everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Hangouts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points
*

Reminds me how much I hate Apple.

Thanks Google for making Android.

Now please turn the evil knob down a notch and go back being the awesome company you once were.

Edit: typo

permalink
report
reply
19 points

The fuck does this have to do with Apple?

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Apple purposely will not integrate this to keep a walled garden around their ecosystem and make messaging between apole/Android a shit experience.

In a perfect world everyone would just adopt rcs, it’s better for consumers but Apple only gives a shit about branding/$$$.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Aside from the fact that Google finally implementing E2EE in RCS not having anything at all to do with Apple, I’m confused.

Apple developed a fully encrypted messaging system 16 years ago, 4 years later RCS was developed but wasn’t even adopted by all three major US carriers until 2 years ago (much more complicated than just this as they refused to work together on Universal Profile standards and Google has so ‘valiantly’ stepped in to do it without them), and Apple is the bad guy for not switching to a competitors standard that was (until now) less secure, uses googles back end services, is arguably less capable, has an extremely poor desktop access experience, is less intuitive to enable, and takes away a competitive advantage? All while other E2EE messaging apps have been available on both iOS and Android for years.

Why not push for google to adopt iMessage as a standard instead? Maybe google has been holding iMessage back for 16 years. Maybe Apple isn’t holding rcs back but carriers are. Or maybe it’s the GSMA. Or maybe it’s a larger systemic issue with capitalism. Or maybe it’s one of any number of other issues that makes it disadvantageous for Apple and Google to work together on this.

This article, cancerous as the site is on mobile, does a good job breaking down the issue and how it’s not as clear cut as folks here are trying to make it: https://www.androidpolice.com/google-rcs-messaging-feud-apple-imessage/

At the end of the day, y’all being angry at Apple about RCS sounds just a bit like simping for google and falling prey to their marketing campaign to try and win the messaging war. Im not really interested in experiencing another chromium situation but with messaging. Particularly when WhatsApp is king in the messaging space globally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

The one thing that feels off to me about Google’s implementation is that it’s not vendor agnostic and all comms would need to go through Google’s servers to work. The E2EE bit is an entirely Google specific extension to RCS, for example. The last thing we need is another chromium situation in a different area.

If it wasn’t a Google specific extension, phone networks around the world would need to pick up the pace and adopt RCS, but also they’d need to keep up to date with the latest version of the standard to ensure the functionality is supported. Now, looking at phone networks’ previous track record, they’re really not going to implement it unless they’re forced to and they’ll do so at a real snails pace.

At this point I’d agree that Apple not adopting RCS is really not helpful here.

I feel the EU’s Digital Market Act that’s forcing messenger applications to be interoperable with each other is going to be a much more viable option towards that perfect world scenario. The IETF is even fleshing out a common protocol for it, MIMI with MLS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

But Signal has been available on Android and iOS this whole time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Doesn’t really explain what google enabling E2E on RCA has to do with Apple

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I feel like Google has everything to gain and apple has more to lose by implementing this. It’s not good guy Google, bad guy Apple. It’s a business decision. I say this as an Apple hater.

If the shoe was on the other foot Google would be doing the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Google tracks you everywhere you go all over the internet. Like 90% of websites have a script that calls home to Google to let them know you visited. That’s their business model.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Still won’t be using it. Sworry!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

More like, sworry not sworry. Am I right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The fuck is google messages? Is this what replaced hangouts?

permalink
report
reply
6 points

It’s the default SMS application on Pixel devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
21 points

Hilarious assumption, but nope. It’s just the default sms app on google phones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Google Chat replaced hangouts and is not E2E.

Google Messages is the Android default SMS App, at least on Pixel phones. It is Android’s best equivalent to “iMessage”

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

As an Apple owner I hope Apple will implement this too. I live in a country where everybody communicates through WhatsApp unfortunately.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

What do you mean? iMessage is fully end to end encrypted.

As far as google messages RCS goes, that’s googles proprietary version of RCS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

iMessage is not fully E2E encrypted unless you have advanced data protection turned on. If you don’t, the keys to your conversations still rest on Apple’s servers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s full E2E encryption even without that turned on. However, just because something is encrypted doesn’t mean it’s secure, as you point out.

Regardless, governments/organizations have gotten very good at finding vulnerabilities and exploiting them before academic and/or private sector security groups discover the same vulnerabilities, who will then go and publish their findings which eventually leads to them getting patched. As a side note: For anyone interested in some modern hacker/cybersecurity history, I recommend reading the book, Sandworm by Andy Greenberg. It’s pretty damn wild what it covers and that’s only a fraction of the modern state of global cyber warfare (and yes, just about the entire world has been engaged in what pretty much amounts to cyber warfare/espionage/sabotage for the last 10-15+ years).

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I don’t think it’s true as long as you don’t make iCloud Backups

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That’s untrue. The keys are generated on your device and Apple doesn’t have those stored. You need apple devices to grant access for another device as Apple doesn’t have your key. There’s other security holes where apple can generate new keys but that doesn’t change the fact that it is actually E2E encrypted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No that’s only for iCloud backups of your iMessages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I think they might mean they wish Apple would support RCS in general (which Apple has been refusing to do)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

For good reason. Honestly anyone pushing for RCS is an idiot or doesn’t understand what they are pushing for.

Among many issues (including E2E missing by default) the idea of giving any control back to carriers is just stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

WhatsApp is already E2E encrypted, it always has been. There’s a circlejerk around here about “not true E2E!”, but that’s just straight up nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

but still leaks a lot of metadata to Facebook/Meta

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Name, service start date, last seen date, IP address, and email address, that’s it. Proof here. Everything Google and Apple also collect. If that’s a problem for you use Signal, not iMessage.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments