0 points
*

Nooo fuck this is stupid!

Plastic in landfills is sequestered carbon! Why release it into the atmosphere?

Breeding bacteria to eat plastic will make plastic less useful as a material. Plastic is awesome because it DOESN’T rot. If we do release plastic eating microorganisms that might change. Whatever environmentalist think, we use plastics for a reason.

What we need is:

  1. Create plastics without oil and from sustainable energy
  2. Recycle plastics (invent better plastics and recycling processes)
  3. Stop throwing plastic in the oceans
  4. bury plastic in landfill to sequester carbon

What exactly is solved by introducing plastic eating microorganisms into the ecosystem? If microplastics don’t deteriorate, they’ll eventually become like sand and all the other shit. I swear to God this is the stupidest thing since solar fricking roadways.

PS: If you absolutely don’t want to recycle or bury plastic you can also burn it in the right circumstances. Instead of feeding it to mushrooms and releasing CO2 and methane into the air you get heat and can capture the CO2.

PPS: Microplastics is a qustion of regulation. And garbage dumping into rivers (like most of the plastic in the oceans comes from a few rivers) is a problem of economic idiocy. Neoliberal Ideology is produced in the US and exported into developing countries. Loans and shit demand privatization of all sorts of services. Including garbage removal. The result? People dump trash in the rivers because muh socialism is bad. Plastic in the ocean is a problem with very simple non-technical solutions.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Would be great if mushrooms don’t burn the carbon and turned it into some other compound using energy(maybe something like fossil fuels)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I did see something about new methods through chemical processes to turn more plastics back into the feedstock. Search “plastic feedstock” or “circular feedstock” or something. It probably requires some chemicals and heat and pressure or something, but that could be powered by solar or wind. It’s just a question of economics (money), investments, and most likely planning.

But really, burning plastic isn’t “nice” but fundamentally there isn’t a big difference between some mineral rock buried below the earth or plastic. And with carbon sequestration it’s a net positive - at least once we stop using fossil fuels and switch to a circular economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Step 1: make everything from plastics

Step 2: create plastic eating fungus to get rid of the trash

Step 3: create serious damage to all parts of our society and technology, as plastic eating fungus spores get everywhere, including our food chain and your brain.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Theoretically if they don’t produce toxins as a byproduct of plastic metabolism, eating the plastics out of our brains could (in an idealized and highly unlikely case) be a good thing. If they don’t also eat organic matter they’ll starve out when the plastics are gone and our immune system could clean out the debris left behind

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

you eat fungus spores every single day nonstop. They are everywhere. Just cause this one eats plastic why would the spores be dangerous? (also it probably only eats one type so like 5% of plastic)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
39 points

We have that. They’re called “plants.” If we just stop cutting down all the trees and poisoning the seas, plants will capture the carbon in the air and return it to the ground when they die. Or it will become part of the natural food chain.

So don’t worry, either we will stop destroying all of the ecosystems, or the plants can fix the planet after we’re all gone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Speak for yourself

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well it’s going to happen one way or the other. The only question is whether humans will be there for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

we can also not just let the entire world become Forrest.

We could make charcoal from the trees and bury the same amount we dug up, but as long as we burn coal for power it’s kind of pointless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Cutting the trees down is fine (well the ones we plant for the purpose I mean) - turn them into books and then store the books. As an added benefit you get books!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Then conservatives get elected, burn all the books and we are back to where we started

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m not a scientist by any stretch, but would disposing of plastics with these mushrooms in a terrarium of sorts help? They would have to be big and numerous.

The mushrooms would break down the plastics into CO2 and water and the plants would absorb the CO2 and water. As the plastics start to go away, we could add more of our excess plastic to keep the cycle going.

If this works, it also keeps the plastic eating mushrooms contained and away from all the essential plastics we have today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sounds like a good plan. I don’t know. Considering the rate at which we produce plastic, I doubt we could ever grow enough mushrooms to keep up, but it would be worth funding the research.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve always wondered how big an impact burying all grass clippings would have… I assume very little since I’ve never heard it mentioned before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just leaving them on the ground allows them to decompose naturally. A better option is to not cut your grass, or have a native groundcover lawn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You would have to bury them really deep to prevent them from being converted fully back to CO2, or worse methane, by other organisms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Certain rocks/minerals will do this. But there is no financial driver today to do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Don’t even ask. Just start releasing that shit.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Do you want The Last of Us? Because this is how you get The Last of Us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Among a hundred other end of days scenarios.

Know what the difference between plastic and oil? (not just crude or motor, but cooking, lubricating, buttering?)

Let’s release a designer consumer that would require very little mutation to end humanity. Do it already.

Depending on your outlook this might just make the notion more enticing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
137 points

Step 1. Invent microplastics.
Step 2. Have people ingest microplastics into their bodies.
Step 3. Evolve plastic-eating mushrooms.
Step 4. ???
Step 5. The Last of Us IRL

permalink
report
reply
19 points
*

Those two dudes in the fenced off city led pretty great lives in The Last of Us. Everyone else suffered terribly though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Step 6: Become a closeted prepper

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

also closeted gays, I guess?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

That needs to be step 3 at the latest, otherwise you won’t be prepared in time for step 5.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.7K

    Posts

  • 94K

    Comments