12 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Apple is officially axing support for progressive web apps for iPhone users located in the European Union.

While web apps have been broken for EU users in every iOS 17.4 beta so far, Apple has now confirmed that this is a feature, not a bug.

In an update to its developer website spotted by 9to5Mac, Apple says it’s removing homescreen apps for users in the EU because bringing them into compliance with the Digital Markets Act (DMA) would involve “an entirely new integration architecture” that’s “not practical” to build on top of the other changes it’s been forced to make.

In its post, Apple argues that web apps are built “directly on WebKit” — the engine used by Safari — allowing web apps to “align with the security and privacy model for native apps on iOS.” With the change to iOS 17.4, websites added to the homescreen now act only as bookmarks that open a new tab in your browser, rather than (potentially) standalone services capable of doing things like sending notifications and showing badges, a feature Apple just added to web apps last year.

Progressive web apps on iOS are also capable of storing data separately from your browser instance, which comes in handy if there’s a site you want quick access to and don’t want to keep signing in.

“Still, we regret any impact this change — that was made as part of the work to comply with the DMA — may have on developers of Home Screen web apps and our users.” Apple cites “very low user adoption” of homescreen apps as another reason for the lack of support.


The original article contains 399 words, the summary contains 272 words. Saved 32%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
16 points

Cutting nose to spite face it seems.

permalink
report
reply
-19 points

The only reason I spend extra for Apple is the security.

If the EU takes that, their entire business model is gone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

How’s apple more secure?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

They make no money by requiring their web engine be used.

What they get is a phone where they prevent apps from snooping around other apps and secretly taking over the camera and microphone.

Here is a Wikipedia page that explains their long fight over encryption.

The EU regs just eliminated all of this protection in the name of commerce, but the big winners are the spy agencies and hackers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

PWA could have been awesome but Apple and Google would rather have apps in their stores where they can clip the ticket. Sad.

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*

*Apple

Google for the longest time was (and still is) one of the biggest supporters of the idea. Chromium overall has the best support for PWAs and some of their Apps (like Google News or Photos) have very competent PWA versions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Samsung’s OneUI handles PWAs much better than stock Android. What Google does is the bare minimum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not from my experience. Almost all Android Variants (including Stock) handle them great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

PWA could have been awesome but Apple and Google would rather have apps in their stores where they can clip the ticket. Sad.

There fixed it for you

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

They want to be fined so badly.

permalink
report
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.de

Create post

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments

Community moderators