Former President Trump on Monday appeared to warn former Georgia lieutenant governor Geoff Duncan against testifying before the Fulton County grand jury in the state’s 2020 election probe.

Driving the news: “I am reading reports that failed former Lt. Governor of Georgia, Jeff Duncan, will be testifying before the Fulton County Grand Jury,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social account on Monday.

  • “He shouldn’t. I barely know him but he was, right from the beginning of this Witch Hunt, a nasty disaster for those looking into the Election Fraud that took place in Georgia.”
  • Duncan, who criticized Trump’s false election fraud claims in 2020, said Saturday that he had been told to appear Tuesday before the Fulton County grand jury.
  • “Republicans should never let honesty be mistaken for weakness,” he wrote in a post on X.

What’s next: Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis appears poised to issue a charging decision on Trump’s alleged efforts to subvert election results.

The big picture: Trump’s Monday Truth Social post comes days after the judge overseeing a separate trial — the federal probe into his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election — warned against making “inflammatory statements” that could intimidate witnesses in that trial.

  • U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan said during a Friday hearing that any appearance of witness tampering would increase the need for a speedy trial.
  • Trump already faces three criminal trials: In D.C. over efforts to overturn the 2020 election, in Florida over his retention of classified documents and in New York over an alleged hush money payment.
201 points
*

This is him attempting to call the judge’s bluff. Following the order, he also posted calling the judge biased. He’s exploring to see if the judge will let him get away with it. He’ll slowly ramp up the posts until the judge tells him to cut it out again, and then he’ll know where the line is. At that point, he’ll simply toe the line and cry “but it wasn’t a problem before” if she tries to cut down on it later.

He believes the judge is afraid to hold him in contempt, and thus far he has been correct. But this is a direct violation of the judge’s order, and the judge shouldn’t let it slide. If she treats this with leniency, he’ll only take it as tacit approval and continue getting more inflammatory. The only reason I can see for the judge allowing it to continue is to give him more rope to hang himself with. One violation of the order is bad, but if she lets it continue and he racks up a bunch of evidence, she may have better justification to hold him and expedite the trial.

permalink
report
reply
136 points

Different case. (Can we pause for a moment to recognize how bonkers it is that a former president has so many criminal cases either in process or pending that it’s getting hard to keep track?)

The judge who ordered him not to engage in any witness tampering is overseeing the federal case against him for trying to overturn the election in 2020. In this particular instance, he appears to have threatened a witness in the Fulton County, Georgia case, for which an indictment is expected soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Would it make a difference? Threatening a witness in one trial when you have several others ongoing and in such a public fashion would have a chilling effect on witness testimony for all trails, or so I would think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

It might. I’m no lawyer, but it’s conceivable that the order will be interpreted as targeted specifically to witnesses in the federal trial.

That said, threatening people is illegal all on its own, so who knows…

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points
*

I hate to say it, but Trump is correct: he could literally murder the judge in this (or any) case on live TV and get away with it. why? because they let him. they refuse to hold him accountable for anything, and that’s why he keeps doing this shit— and getting away with it.

The only reason I can see for the judge allowing it to continue is to give him more rope to hang himself with

the problem is: HE NEVER GETS HUNG WITH THE ROPE. he just gets away with everything, time and time again. fines are meaningless to him because he just gets his idiot supporters to pay for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

And lets stop pretending that any level of discourse is going to reach the remaining trump cult, we could literally have a video of him raping their mothers and they would still vote for him, so its time to give up on those people they are never coming back no matter how much evidence we have or how many charges there are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

we could literally have a video of him raping their mothers and they would still vote for him

They would. They would call the video ‘fake news’ and find it easier to assume their mother was lying than admit their false prophet is capable of any wrongdoing. They’ve built their entire identities around their unwavering confirmation bias. The vast majority of people who ever successfully disconnect from a cult do so only posthumously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

MAGA cultists: Our moms should be honored that Trump likes them!

Also MAGA cultists: Dems caused our moms to get raped!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I believe under U.S. Law they have to arrest him again and post no bail. This is a blatant disregard for the law. To not act is an injustice to the history of common law going back 800+ years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I can’t even tell if you’re joking. that’s how much of a shitshow joke our justice system has become.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He could walk into court fully erect shouting “Yes! I did it motherfuckers, I am guilty, I am death!” and the judge would still let him roll up in her crib, take a shit, dress up like Santa and take pictures with her kids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

its Jesse “He can’t keep getting away with this!” but in real life

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

This is for the Georgia case which hasn’t gone to a judge yet, he’s just trying to get ahead of things before he gets a gag order here too… which this will be used as evidence for…

But you’re right, there’s enough going on that it’s hard to tell the players without a program, so I made this:

This seemed to be popular information when I posted it (ahem) “elsewhere”. Thought it might be welcome to have here.

If you’re trying to keep track of where we’re at in the Trump prosecutions:

Updated 8/10/2023

Washington, D.C. - 4 felonies, January 6th Election Interference
Investigation
Indictment
Arrest <- You Are Here
(DOJ lawyer Jack Smith has requested a trial date of 1/2/2024, Trump lawyers have yet to supply a counter date. The judge will announce a final date on 8/28)
Trial
Conviction
Sentencing

Georgia - Election Interference
Investigation <- You Are Here
2 new grand juries impaneled 7/11/2023.
Indictment - July 11th to September 1st.
(Grand Jury work expected July 31 to Aug. 18)
(Streets around the Fulton County courthouse will be closed from 8/7 to 8/18.)
Arrest
Trial
Conviction
Sentencing

New York State - 34 felonies, Stormy Daniels Payoff
Investigation
Indictment
Arrest <- You Are Here
Trial - March 25th, 2024
Conviction
Sentencing

Florida - 40 felonies, Federal documents charges
Investigation
Indictment
Original indictment was for 37 felonies.
3 new felonies were added on July 27, 2023.
Arrest <- You Are Here
Trial - May 20, 2024
Conviction
Sentencing

Other grand juries, such as for the documents at Bedminster, have not been announced.

The E. Jean Carroll trial for sexual assault and defamation where Trump was found liable and ordered to pay $5 million before immediately defaming her again resulting in a demand for $10 million is not listed as it’s a civil case and not a crimimal one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

2 more indictments and he gets a free sub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

One prison term and he gets free footlongs for life. 😯

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I appreciate you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I don’t know that I’d attribute any actual strategy to this.

I think that’s a mistake that everyone had made about Trump from the beginning.

“Oh, he’s a marketing genius!”

Why? Because he put his name on everything? Maybe there’s a simple explanation: he’s a raging narcissist who likes putting his name on everything. The fact that his name is synonymous with being the top, or besting something is just his sheer dumb luck.

The fact is, every single thing he’s ever done can be explained as being an expression of his narcissism and impulse control problems, combined with the fact that he faces zero consequences for his behavior no matter how awful.

So, no, I don’t think he was testing the judge. I think he was just mindlessly attacking anyone who is a threat to him like he has always done in every situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

His grandfather changed the family name from Drumpf to Trump, so his family chose to name themselves as ‘on top’ intentionally. He just inherited the narcissism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s sad, really because if ever there was a person to match the sound “Drumpf”, it’s that sack of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That kind of anglicization was very common for immigrants of all types a century ago. Like my own g’g’grandmother.

There are plenty of reasons to dislike that whole family, that’s not one I hold against them, or anybody else for that matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The only reason I can see for the judge allowing it to continue is to give him more rope to hang himself with.

How much rope does one man get? He has already been given the entire rope store, distribution center, and manufacturing plant. He has so much rope he’d have to fall all the way to mars before he reached the end. He has more rope than he could ever use. At some point the hangman needs to do his job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you give someone more than enough rope to hang themselves with, they can hang one end from the ceiling, put the other around their neck and be standing solidly on the floor harm-free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

He’ll just continue to say what he’s always said, that this judge or that attorney or whoever is against him and this, that, and the other is rigged against him. As far as he’s concerned, it’s him vs the world.

Did you hear him the other day when he told people at his rally, “I’m being indicted for you.” Like he’s the second coming of Jesus and he died for his supportters’ sins.

As long as his supporters are on board, he’ll say whatever shit to make him look like the victim. And his supporters will be all for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The man thinks that getting locked up helps him, and that it will fundraise for him. He’s delusional to think that he’ll magically be elected next year and then pardon himself and walk out of jail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
131 points
*

What is it actually going to take to put this fucker in jail? Does he need to intimidate 20 witnesses first? I hate that the justice system feels they need to walk on eggshells around this wanna-be dictator cry baby.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Why 20? Why not 50, or 500? Why not let him stage a coup and attempt to overthrow the government of the United States of America? Oh right, he already did all that stuff and is still walking free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

How do you provide a secret service detail to someone in jail?

Logistics and stupid wording of laws never intended to protect someone so blatantly corrupt, will keep him from ever seeing the inside of a cell. Would be nice if he could be under house arrest with no visitation/internet access though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You still have to get fed. Can’t have a person in solitary shouting classified information through the food slot at the guard who doesn’t have a security clearance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

A while back I actually looked into this question.

Former presidents are afforded several things by law, including a salary, a stipend for an assistant, and office space rental, and, of course, Secret Service protection for their lifetime.

However, the protection provided by the USSS is described as a duty to protect the (former) President. It doesn’t describe, what that looks like, how many agents are involved, or so on. It does allocate, though, up to $1,000,000 every fiscal year to provide that protection.

Hypothetically, if Trump were convicted and the punishment included imprisonment, more likely than not, the USSS would simply arrange for the individual to be isolated from any threats inside the prison and hand custody over to the prison. This might look like a member of the USSS being stations at the prison, essentially, as a guard, supervisor, monitor, etc.

I suspect the realistic scenario would look like the individual being put in an isolated wing or some sort of maximum-security facility, and the USSS checking in on a weekly or even daily schedule, and, in exchange, the prison would be allocated some portion of that annual $1,000,000.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Just get one of those cages he used for the Mexican kids and put it right in the secret service office. Boom, problem solved. They don’t even have to leave their desks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Someone’s gotta change his diapers

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You don’t. You throw his ass into solitary confinement since he can’t be in gen-pop, just like you would any other high-profile prisoner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Depriving him of publicity woul be the worst punishment for this waste of skin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

ADX Florence was built for exactly this kind of situation.

Would be a dogshit posting for his detail, but Secret Service is Trumpland anyway so I assume he’ll still have lackeys lining up to get the spot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Just regular prison guards would do

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He’s an old white dude with millions of dollars. He will go to “Club Fed” or more likely some kind of house arrest or probation. Honestly you don’t want him in a real badass prison because that makes him a martyr. If he’s just convicted and ignored that’s a worse punishment as he’ll slide into obscurity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just strip him of his citizenship and dump him at the border. Preferably next to the wall on the US side. Tell him he has 1 hour to climb the wall to Mexico or the dogs will be unleashed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Who cares? They can do time with him if they want I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

House arrest with no internet or phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s not justice

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The thing is that the prosecutors have to play by the rules to get him, which takes time, but recently the claws definitely seems to be closing in on him, and the prosecutors have bemig weapons and trump can’t stop the system.

Right now it’s like a tank going very slowly toward Trump, sure it takes time but if the tank operator does everything right, it will get there eventually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I feel like the whole “the jaws of justice are slowly closing around trump” comment is the narrative version of that looping gif of the truck almost running into the bollard. Academically, I agree with you. But I’m pretty sure the dude is going to be dead from one of the innumerable heath issues he faces before he sees any real consequence. Time will tell I guess, but like others, I’m not holding my breath. If there were any real justice in the world, trump would have died from Covid. That would have at least been poetic justice for his role in that colossal tragedy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I totally feel what you’re saying and that is scary, but the big difference now is that there are trial dates, we are not in the “at some point” phase anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

And allowing witnesses to be intimidated is like allowing trump to have a Javelin in your tank analogy. For the cases to be prosecuted correctly, the necessary witnesses need to give their testimony without fear of retaliation. He needs to be put into pre-trail detainment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We need to wait until it’s normalized.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

I’m convinced that Trump could murder someone live on camera and then claim it wasn’t him, a shapeshifter did it, and get away with it and still have a voter base defending him.

permalink
report
reply
28 points
*

So is he

Quote from January 2016:

“I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters,”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The Bat-shit crazy right would praise him for flexing his second amendment rights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

You’re missing a few steps that would occur after the murder. Here’s a helpful guide that would explain the path (curtesy of Dayna Craig):

The Narcissist’s Prayer

  • That didn’t happen. <—YOU ARE HERE
  • And if it did, it wasn’t that bad.
  • And if it was, that’s not a big deal.
  • And if it is, that’s not my fault.
  • And if it was, I didn’t mean it.
  • And if I did, you deserved it.
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The feds move slowly, but they have their teeth into him now.

Beau Of The Fifth Column has been pretty much nothing but diving into how fucked Trump is, finally, for a few months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*

The Judge should lock him up for witness tampering.

18 U.S. Code § 1512 In cases of a threat of physical force intended to witness tamper, the maximum punishment is 20 years in federal prison. Intimidation, threats, or corrupt persuasion also subjects the defendant to a maximum punishment of 20 years imprisonment.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

This is a state-level case, so it would be Georgia’s criminal code that would apply, not Federal

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

U.S. Code takes precedence over State Codes. So the State and Federal government can charge him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

serious question, is it possible the judge is literally scared for their life if they do this? the first judge that actually stands up and applies the actual law will be praised by people globally, but become a target for millions of MAGA idiots overnight

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Under Georgia law it is a felony with a minimum of two, maximum of ten years in prison plus a maximum of $20,000 in fines.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Cool. Too bad they’ll ignore it no matter how many times he does it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I would guess that since charges haven’t actually been filed, he’s going to be in the clear for this one.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 386K

    Comments