Reposted from here

71 points

One of my favorite past times is reading people freaking out about the rising costs, while I sit completely unaffected thanks to the high seas.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

I never stopped torenting what I wanted to watch, so doesn’t effect me at all.

permalink
report
reply
43 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I also don’t have to switch between 10 different apps to watch different shows/movies.

I paid for annual subscriptions for a couple streaming services, and get some when I buy other things from companies, but I still pirate the shows on those services and put them in Plex because everything is in one place

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That’s nice, dear

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

When all the big cable players started making their own streaming services, most of us knew they weren’t going to let their gravy train go. We know they want us to use the ad-tiers because Iger flat out said so because it makes them more money, and I’m still expecting contracts to be their next big idea, sign up for 2 years, get 1-year half-price. Meet new cable, same as the old cable. It’s following a similar playbook too with no ads to some ads and ever-increasing prices.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

This. I was fine with streaming when it started. It’s literally what most people were asking for - a la carte pricing for specific channels you want, rather than having to pay a bloated fee for a bundle that you want less than a tenth of.

I’ve enjoyed streaming over the last few years.

But over the pandemic and now beyond, they’ve decided to start conglomerating, bundling up a bunch of content I don’t want, and charging me extra for the privilege. Which was the complaint about cable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

There’s like 3 companies that control all the music and they are getting a great deal from streaming providers. plus they can and do step on the artists to keep the end user price low. (use band camp plz)

Video companies wouldn’t bother spinning up their own streaming service if netflix could give them even half of what Music companies are getting and there was only a single creator to screw over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah to me the obvious end days was when the “half priced but with ads” plans came out. It’s going the route of cable. the patern is so predictable.

Year 1: Ad free - 5-10,

Year 2: Ad free 10-15

Year 3: ad free 10-15, low price ad tier 5-10

Year 4: ad free 20-30, ad tier 10-15

Year 5: ad tier 25-30, ad free 75

Year 6: Due to low demand, ad free tier is removed. ad tier 40-50.

That’s of course counting the shitification of their being 20 services, which are equally sharing shows of every genre so that no matter what type of shows you like, you’ll need to use 3-4 services to get the main shows you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I mean anyone who didn’t see this coming is naive as fuck.

No infrastructure overhead, server cost to be sure but the brunt of the delivery being born by the end consumer and the possibility of tracking and metrics in real time?

The only reason it’s taken this long is the suits are luddites.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Contracts will definitely come. What’s the equipment going to be though? Pay for an app? Maybe USB sticks for each service?

I feel dirty typing that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

6 months half price if you sign up for 2 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Nothing a month is still affordable and always has been.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I’m happy with my $5 pm for Usenet + Indexer, on top of hard drive costs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Where?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I use Frugal Usenet via this link and NZBGeek as my indexer for $6/6m

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The disruptive streaming model birthed by Netflix that dangled all-you-can-eat menus of films, shows, and endless entertainment without pesky advertisements for extraordinarily low prices came to an official close on Wednesday.

Disney boss Bob Iger announced during the company’s quarterly earnings report that the Magic Kingdom will once again hike Disney+ prices for the second time in less than a year, increasing the monthly cost of its ad-free plan $3 to $13.99 in October.

When Iger launched Disney+ in 2019, the chief executive said he had intentionally set the price of the service well below competitors “to reach as many people as possible with it.”

But Wednesday’s move to significantly bump prices, marked an acknowledgment by Iger of the media giant’s intent to squeeze more revenue out of streaming by pushing consumers to the advertising-supported plans, which have proven to be more profitable.

When Netflix first offered its pioneering service for only $8 a month, millions of people signed up, eager to have access to the company’s expansive catalog for just a fraction of the cost of the traditional cable bundle.

That served as the genesis of the streaming era, with legacy entertainment companies such as Disney racing to launch their own direct-to-consumer products at unsustainably low costs.


I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
20 points

It’s all about ads to them, and I will do anything in my power not to see ads of products I am not interested in… which is pretty much anything being advertised to me.

Canada has advertising restrictions, notably drug commercials and until recently: sports betting. I wish they hadn’t allowed those, they’re the worst and since we’re a new market every single site is advertising up here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ads, and the fucking invasive data farming that follows it, are the bane of modern existence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Be thankful you don’t have the drug ads. They’re an infestation down here. The companies advertise the crap out of a drug that costs the patient 3-4k+/mo, it enters the doctors subconscious so they’re more likely to recommend to the patients, pharma company makes bank, the lawsuits roll in right around the time the copyright on the brand name ends (they’re all shit drugs and barely more effective than placebo, yet with knarly side effects), they close it down and let the generic manufacturers fight it out while they pump the next shit pill or shot. Rinse and repeat.

Sports betting needs to go too, but I bet they’ll just move those into shows like big tobacco did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We have them, but they’re not allowed to say what the drug is. So only certain drugs bother, like Ozempic, but entire commercial is just everyone asking “Have you heard about Ozempic?” “Talk to your doctor about Ozempic”

They can’t say what it treats or side effects etc. I like old game shows from the 70s so I’ll sometimes pick up an IPTV sub so I can watch the US gameshow channel, and then cancel shortly after because all the commercials are either drug commercials on repeat or mesicaid commercials on repeat. Its terrible.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others


Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.


Community stats

  • 5.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.1K

    Posts

  • 75K

    Comments