And no, I will not tell you what my company app is.

115 points

Google and apple already know who you are, the company at the bottom doesn’t

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Lol, that’s a fun angle. They don’t need all those fields coz they just get your information the other way

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Wrong, the google product is dead

permalink
report
reply
18 points

And the Apple product would probable say “gloat about me to your friends”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And it was one they bought, just to kill it… Google: the sadist of the tech world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

People at my company are like “why are we wasting screen real estate with white space?” and I imagine they see the last image is an ideal UX

permalink
report
reply
38 points

We’re currently trying to convince our client, that 4 different levels “mandatory” fields in a form are about two too many.

The UI they sketched looks like shit, but they think it’s absolutely necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

But there was this one customer, where it was so helpful to know he’s left handed. So now this is a necessary information /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And then the logging shows that nobody uses half the fields, but the business won’t let you remove any.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

For the first two you need hoops and tricks for it to do what you want, the last one has bad UX. I choose the later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I would argue that the first two require you to jump through hoops for edge cases, while the last one requires you to jump through hoops for every case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Without knowing what the user is actually doing, that’s impossible to know. If the user has to input all those fields on a regular basis, then that one screen is the superior UX.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If I’m going to jump through hoops anyway I’d like some degree of control over the experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

yeah. usability > UX

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The last example has neither.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The flipside is that all of the stuff you actually use is buried five levels deep.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And the flip side of that is that the stuff you actually use is spread over 5 pages worth of scrolling and requires you to read like 100 labels until you find the text boxes you want

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Apple/Google/Other Companies way, way over-do this. Clean, modern design is one thing, but avoiding all text, making things too small to see, and being unable to tell which option is highlighted, etc, all at the expense of the actual UX is such an annoying trend and I’ll never like it.

I’m a Millennial so of course I don’t have a lawn, but get off it anyway…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t necessarily agree that they way overdo it, but I do agree those are all examples of bad UX design.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They’re right

permalink
report
parent
reply
63 points

more checkboxes == more better

permalink
report
reply
36 points

I actually kinda like that one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Those are radio buttons, tho. But nice work with fieldsets 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh god I know 3rd party encoders like this from from my tape flipping days. They’re some sort of dark sorcery you never question. Just press “will try to play or encode” and then make the appropriate sacrifice at your altar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I don’t understand, what did poor codecs and bitrates do wrong to deserve such harsh treatment, viciously denied checkbox privileges forever destined to a pleb drop-down menu :'(

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

hey this thing was great back in the day

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I loved making interfaces like that for internal systems in the past. I’d find a way to put everything relevant on the screen and able to be read or interacted with any time it’s necessary. I also had it flow top to bottom and left to right, because there was typically a physical process step associated with that station.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why is there a radio box for RealProducer if you may select FFmpeg or MEncoder? 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

Honestly, I’d rather have an ugly app with everything right there than the terrible UX trend that’s happening of everything being hidden behind 8-10 different menus just to make the home screen “clean”

permalink
report
reply
8 points

It would be hilarious if all these apps were secretly just like vim. They all have complex hotkey setups that enable power users to get where they need to be in at most 3 key presses.

And the unititiated has to google to find where their god damn setting is actually located.

Honestly that would be great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Very often they do. Many of these internal applications are from mainframe computer times when interacting with applications exclusively via the keyboard shortcuts was the norm. In most companies, they never dared to remove those because the Power Users are used to them for decades.

Problem is, few people are trained directly by those power users so they never learn those efficient shortcuts. And they are never well documented.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

One of my favorite extensions is vimium. It enables vim like navigation on web browsers. If you press ? It brings up a menu showing all the key bindings, it’s very helpful. Adding that and a hotkey highlighter would be a good way to document such programs. It’s too bad that sort of thing isnt a priority

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, or like having a separate screen for entering your username and one for entering your password …

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We’ve removed critical functionality from the operating system because our boss didn’t want more than 6 buttons on screen at any time. Sorry the system is 100x more difficult to use!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

On the one hand most power users feel this way. On the other hand power users probably aren’t the majority of users (although it depends on the product).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The trend definitely comes from the fact that new people get overwhelmed by cluttered user interfaces. But just having a clean initial screen doesn’t mean good UX. Good UX is the art of providing a clean, logical user interface that’s simple and efficient to use. Unfortunately, too many companies just go for minimalism and wind up with things both taking longer and ending up being harder to use.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 6.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.4K

    Posts

  • 32K

    Comments