A Texas woman was awarded $1.2 billion in damages last week after she sued her former boyfriend and accused him of sending intimate images of her to her family, friends and co-workers from fake online accounts.

The woman, who is identified only by the initials D.L. in court documents, sued her former boyfriend, Marques Jamal Jackson, claiming he had psychologically and sexually abused her by distributing so-called revenge porn, a term for sexually explicit photos or videos of someone that are shared without consent.

The couple started dating in 2016 and were living together in Chicago in early 2020 when they began a “long and drawn-out break up,” according to the lawsuit. D.L. temporarily moved to her mother’s house in Texas and Mr. Jackson began accessing the security system there to spy on her, the lawsuit said.

In October 2021, the couple officially ended their relationship and D.L. told Mr. Jackson that she no longer wanted him to have access to what the lawsuit described as “visual intimate material” of her that she had allowed him to have while they were a couple.

Instead, he posted the images on several social media platforms and websites, including a pornographic website, and in a publicly accessible folder on the online file-sharing service Dropbox, the lawsuit said. He identified her in the material, using her name and address, and images of her face. He created fake social media pages and email accounts to share the material with her family, friends and co-workers, including by sending them a link to the Dropbox folder. On the social media pages where he had posted the images, he tagged accounts for her employer and for her personal gym.

The lawsuit says that this was still happening days before the complaint was filed in April 2022.

Mr. Jackson also used D.L.’s personal bank account to pay his rent, harassed her with calls and text messages from masked numbers, and told her loan officer that she had submitted a fraudulent loan application, the lawsuit said.

In a March 2022 email to D.L. cited in the lawsuit, Mr. Jackson said, “You will spend the rest of your life trying and failing to wipe yourself off the internet.”

Mr. Jackson could not be reached for comment. It was not clear if he had a lawyer.

He also did not appear in court on Wednesday, when a jury in Houston ordered him to pay $200 million for past and future mental anguish and $1 billion in punitive damages.

91 points

He’ll be paying that off for a while

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Water from a stone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Hardly - he has an SSN. Any job that pays taxes he’ll be garnished. Even if he manages to hide his identity with a fake ssn, his life as it was is ruined. Definitely a form of justice considering he literally was trying to ruin her life through these actions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

God I love being a bartender.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Sounds like he was charged in absentia, so more symbolic than anything, sadly. I hope she gets some money though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Yeah. Sadly, the quote “If you owe the bank a thousand dollars, it’s your problem; if you owe them a billion, it’s their problem” applies here too. Hopefully she bleeds him dry and maybe some prison time too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

His wages will be garnished forever. He’s been sentenced to destitution forever. He’d be better off just leaving the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I wouldn’t say he is sentenced to destitution. Wage garnishment is capped at 25% of disposable income. And you keep a minimum of 217.5 per week (30 hours of minimum wage a week).

A 25% pay cut certainly hurts but depending on his income he could still have a decent life.

The amount is ridiculous but even a more reasonable sentence around 500k-5mil would probably not change anything for his situation. Most people wouldn’t pay that off in their lifetime at 25% of income.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Iirc the 25% cap really only ends up applying if you have more than one active garnishment. Individual garnishments are generally 10% of gross. Maybe there are exceptions where one can go up to the full 25% of disposable, but it’s rarely the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I’m hoping he’s a US citizen so he won’t be able to avoid paying US taxes anywhere he goes without also getting a new identity and going into permanent hiding. As long as his life is destroyed far more comprehensively than his attempt to destroy hers, I’m happy.

Well done that jury. This is not just about a very large settlement, it’s a very newsworthy settlement. It’s impossible to measure the impact on crimes that don’t happen but I reckon there will be a fair few potential perpetrators of this sort of crime who might just manage to get a fucking grip because of this. And a fair few victims who find a way to exact an entirely justified revenge on those who fail to grow the fuck up anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

well if he was to leave the US and never return there’s very little risk in not paying the bills. it’s likely little would happen if you came back to visit for the holidays, either

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

He would have been better off not trying to ruin her life and put her directly in harms way.

Putting up naked pictures of someone with their name and address? This is a man who wanted her raped or dead.

Fuck your sympathy for him having consequences for his own actions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Probably $100-200 per month depending on his salary.

It’s a bit like those cases where a defendant gets 54 life sentences + 100 years. Only in America.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

$200 million for past and future mental anguish and $1 billion in punitive damages

NB: Texas caps punitive damages to $750k.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

So 200.75 million. Still not bad

But still, largely symbolic

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yep. And that’s rough. BigOilCorp 750k is lunch money. So that’s just shit.

Sure it’ll crush this guy though…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So what’s the point of such a high number that literally only a handful of people could actually pay? Headlines?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Exactly, judge wanted to make a point.

This makes it national news.

TBF, I wouldn’t be surprised if a large percentage of people would of considered doing what he did, a “dick move” or “petty” but not a serious crime. This serves as a wake up call.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-94 points

Oh for fucks sakes. We have people who were wrongly imprisoned and spent decades in jail and they get a couple of hundred Gs and this lady is awarded $1.2B because someone saw her hoo-ha. We really have fucked up morals. The award amount is so obnoxious that I’m almost glad she’ll never see a dime of it. This is just a mockery of justice.

permalink
report
reply
27 points
*

You are glad she won’t get any kind of compensation for what she has to endure?

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Just because we can do better in one department doesn’t mean it’s bad we’re doing good in another department.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

She was awarded 200 mil with the 1B in punitive damages, which the state caps at 750k.

So 200.75 mil total in the end.

200 mil is still ridiculous, so your point still stands ¯\_ (ツ) _/¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I think it’s an absurd ruling as well, but I don’t feel bad for the douchebag in question. I don’t really understand how they came up with the numbers. 1 billion in punitive damages? Based on what? Crazy.

But I’m fine with the guy being financially ruined for it. He deserves that much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He posted her real name and address along with those videos and pics of her, which is basically opening her up to being attacked. He also threatened her job prospects and threatened to continue harassing her for the rest of her life. I agree that there should be more paid out to wrongly imprisoned people, but this was more than just having her hoo-ha shown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Dieselgate cost VW $15B which affected literally millions of people on a global scale over over a decade of gaming emissions standards.

The Enron accounting scandal cost $7B and involved one of the richest corporations in the nation.

The Gulf of Mexico oil spill cost BP $20B and caused irreparable damage to the environment down there.

But yeah, having your pics posted online and one’s address leaked is SURELY on a similar level to these other crimes. Oh, definitely! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

That doesn’t mean this case is no big deal. Poor woman.

I do agree that the large amount is silly because the guy is probably not a billionaire. Hopefully they will increase punishments for corporations and rich people-- oh wait, they won’t. That’s fucked up, but not related to this case

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You can call out the hypocrisy without minimizing her suffering. “They saw your bits, so what” is a ridiculous response to having your private sex videos shared with everyone you know

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Look, I get that she was wronged, but unless the defendant is Google or Microsoft, leveling damages like this is egregious and absurd.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

You can’t bleed a rock.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They may have well awarded 150 billion dollars worth of damages. There’s no way it’ll ever be paid so what’s the goal here? Showcase an astronomical amount as a flex?

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Yes, it is a flex. It’s an expression of zero tolerance for the kind of egregious shit this turkey was pulling.

The US system seems to use symbolic numbers, eg 200 years in jail for multiple murdering etc, pretty regularly. I don’t see how this is any different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You’ve got a point. America greatly prefers superfluous symbolism to sensible logic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes, kind of like sentencing somebody to hundreds or years or multiple lifetimes for mass murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The point is not really the money. The point is the headline and the fact that there are remedies for when you can’t pay a judgement. Like others said, his wages will be garnished forever. And this is one of the largest civil judgements ever. That plus the salacious nature means that anytime this guy’s name is searched for, it will be beside this. It won’t leave him.

Until we get better laws for things like revenge porn where there are actual criminal penalties, this is probably the best we can do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-42 points

permalink
report
reply
3 points

There’s a time and a place…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 549K

    Comments