Billionaire philanthropist and author MacKenzie Scott announced Tuesday she is giving $640 million to 361 small nonprofits that responded to an open call for applications.

Yield Giving’s first round of donations is more than double what Scott had initially pledged to give away through the application process. Since she began giving away billions in 2019, Scott and her team have researched and selected organizations without an application process and provided them with large, unrestricted gifts.

In a brief note on her website, Scott wrote she was grateful to Lever for Change, the organization that managed the open call, and the evaluators for “their roles in creating this pathway to support for people working to improve access to foundational resources in their communities. They are vital agents of change.”

164 points

I know general consensus is fuck billionaires, and I’m not exactly desputing that, but I work in IT for a rural school district and a donation from her foundation allowed the district to set up a foundation and now 50 of our students can attend a local community College on full scholarship each year.

permalink
report
reply
127 points

To be fair, she took a billionaire’s (Jeff Bezos) money and is now redistributing $38b of his wealth. She’s one of the good ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
113 points
*

It was her money too, as she was a core founding member of Amazon, but until their divorce it was locked up in shares.

It does sure seem like she wanted to give a lot of it away, probably for a long time. I’m glad his midlife crisis is helping so many people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

If you look into the matter, she very much helped to earn that money. It’s hers, not taken from anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nobody actually earns that much, and I doubt that her labor directly created that much real value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well if we ignore all the exploitation of workers and public infastructure/resources we can say they earned their money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

The exception that proves the rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That’s not what that means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

She’s strategically working on no longer being a billionaire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

And we could do the same without the billionaires. Since they don’t create value, we can skip the part where the money goes to them, and directly support our communities. Eliminate billionaires as a drain on our society.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I see both sides of this. I agree with you in principle, but practically the US can’t get its shit together. Would you trust the government with an influx of cash? They’d probably turn it into weapons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

The thing I like most about what she is doing unlike other billionaire philanthropists is that her money is given with no strings attached.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Sure, it’s great, but I’d rather them not have to beg for it and instead take the money they’re leaching from society by force. They should just be forced to give that money in taxes, not have the schools beg for scraps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

This is the answer. Philanthropy is great and all. But how awesome would it be if philanthropy wasn’t needed. And who tends to make philanthropy necessary? The wealthy and billionaires taking far more than their share.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Whilst commendable, that is not the job of billionaires.

Other countries have free access to adult education. Some are even paid to attend

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Every billionaire’s priority should be to not be a billionaire anymore. She’s doing a great job so far both trying to get to that goal and being an example of what we should expect from these people.

As a side note it should not even be up to them. Billionaires should be taxed enough that it’s not possible to be a billionaire but in the absence of an effective government I’m glad she’s doing this instead.

permalink
report
reply
-6 points

Billionaires should be taxed enough that it’s not possible to be a billionaire

Disagree. I’m happy for billionaires to be taxed at 80% effective or higher.

100% inheritance tax on billionaires though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Cool. Please explain how it’s possible for someone to work hard enough to deserve 1000 years worth of earning 1 million dollars a year. That’s 1 billion dollars. No one deserves that kind of money. Period. If you work hard and are very talented you should earn more than others. Fine. A billion dollars though? Not possible to work that hard or be that talented.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

Cool. Please explain how it’s possible for someone to work hard enough to deserve 1000 years worth of earning 1 million dollars a year.

Invent something that 1bn people will pay. $1 for.

No one deserves that kind of money.

What is immoral about numbers greater than 10**9 specifically? Plenty of houses in Japan cost more than 1bn JPY.

Not possible to work that hard or be that talented.

Millions of Taylor Swift fans disagree with you.

HOWEVER

My initial statement was based around economics. Billionaires are very mobile and can live almost anywhere in the world. Would we prefer to tax 80% of 100 Billionaires or 100% of zero Billionaires?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Sadly, I suspect some assholes will be along any moment to tell us all about how evil she is and how she’s infecting kids with 5g or some such.

permalink
report
reply
46 points

Billionaire philanthropy is undemocratic and governments just need to tax better and put that GDP towards things we prioritize together as nations

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

But where will we get the classic “Billionaire saves orphans from orphan crushing machine” that never follows up on who built the orphan crushing machine?

Instead we’d just get the classic news headline “Imagine the worst person you can, we found that guy and he’s getting free money from the government welfare program” Which I would add barely happens to most CEOs and billionaires today (they do own most the press, after all)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

She’s quite literally the opposite of those evil billionaires. She’s a shining example that should be praised and used as a model.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“But billionnaire bad cause has the money!” is how people typically respond. I don’t even think being able to get billions is bad. The number itself is whatever. Actions are what’s important. A handful of the whatever-naires aren’t steaming piles of ass, so we should support them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t even think being able to get billions is bad

Translates to

I don’t think exploiting those who work for me is bad

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

She needs to deposit 10k only my bank account. That’ll take care of my rent for 6 months.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

It’s crazy how little it would take to change all our lives.

Mere 2k would put me so far ahead, it’s basically 2 years worth of saving.

And then you try to comprehend what a billion is like and it’s intangible. A million we can imagine, it’s a fancy ass house. But a billion? I simply can’t imagine how much money that is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

ya know the difference between a billion and a million?

About a billion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

20 fancy ass houses in every single state in the USA. I’d never thought of it that way until now and that’s obscene.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

A million seconds is 12 days. A billion seconds is 32 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

She needs to be my sugar mommy. That will take care of my whole life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ll take that, too

permalink
report
parent
reply

Welcome to the family

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

$1500/month in an LA studio.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Always open your mind to other’s situations. You probably don’t have 4 roommates, but they might. 😉

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Trump:hi it’s me your non profit

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 510K

    Comments