39 points

Anyone that changes colour of emoji are weird.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

I’ll be honest, anyone making judgements about skin color of emojis needs some real issues to focus on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think it’s weird not to use a skin colour emoji. An everyday form of prejudice is the assumption that white is the default. Black or brown is an exotic/diverse category. That other people have odd customs and social norms, but our customs and religions are normal.

It’s even worse in design where the default human we design for is a man, hence women struggling with phone sizes that are too large for their hands. I think anything that helps break away from these default assumptions is good.

We already know from the Simpsons that yellow is a stand-in for white so it’s not neutral. There’s a white skin colour emoji, and by not using it when black/brown people use the other emojis, you’re refusing to acknowledge that you too have a non-neutral, non-default skin colour.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But I don’t want to choose my emojis based on the colour of my skin, I’d prefer to use something “neutral”, and while yellow as you said is not really neutral, it’s the closest thing we have to a neutral colour from all available options. I also don’t think unicode requires that the unmodified emoji be rendered as being yellow (correct me if I’m mistaken), and it’s probably apple and google who just decided that their fonts should render them as being yellow. I imagine one could with another font make them be magenta or some other color.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think it was a mistake to go with yellow in the first place and I see the case for changing it to magenta/green/anything.

But I think when we’re representing people or human hands it’s necessary to allow for skin colour, and by not doing so we’re needlessly erasing people. I’m just not a fan of the ‘it’s racist to bring up race’ argument, which is not what you’re saying but the original comment was veering towards

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My former boss always made sure we knew she was white when she used emojis. I’m like, lady- we all see you. Even the people who work remotely see you via Zoom meetings. You don’t need to let us know you’re white. Why are you making an effort?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Emojis are contributing to racism https://imgur.com/gallery/871WEZh

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

I like the default one because it makes me feel like I’m from the Simpsons

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wait, you’re not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think they’re from the wild thornberries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s all The Simpson’s fault. They shouldn’t have given people of colour human skin tones. Apu should be yellow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Would they do like Doug and make Carl blue?

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

I read an article which stated that by Apple introducing the colorized emoji, they actually increased racism. The author said that people feel awkward not using the different skin tones since they’re there, but by doing so they expose their race, which opens them up to racist attacks and makes them stand out of the group. I’d argue that it’s just exposing the racism that was already inherent in the community, but I didn’t write the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just use a different race emoji everytime doesn’t have to match you

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s extra work for no reason, when the orange-yellow one is default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But then people would start being accused of racial appropriation

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

NGL, I’ve witnessed and experienced this phenomenon and I think we should go back to stick figures for emojis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, it’s a bit of a double-edged sword. It could reduce racism by making people of color more visible. Most racists aren’t inherently pro-white, rather they’re picking some arbitrary criteria for us vs. the others. As a result, making it visible to them that their ‘us’ is lots of people of color, they’ll drop that nonsense criteria pretty quickly.

But of course, chicken-egg and all that, people experiencing racism may not necessarily want to expose their race for the reasons you named, and so they don’t become collectively visible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

As long as you don’t assume this ball gender you’re fine

permalink
report
reply
4 points

This is probably just a consequence of how unicode emoji modifiers work

permalink
report
reply
12 points

But why on earth is the basketball modifiable with the skin color? Are we going to do that with all emoji? Are we finally gonna have the 🍆 in all skin tones?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

That’s not how it works. A user may add to the modifier character but they still need to be an actual image change to actually cause the character to do anything.

It’s not a tint it’s actually a different image that’s being loaded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Would fit into a Wolfenstein game. We in Germany have lampshade made out of human skin, in a concentation camp.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

This is not true.

permalink
report
reply

Funny

!funny@sh.itjust.works

Create post

General rules:

  • Be kind.
  • All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
  • Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
  • No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
  • Don’t post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

Community stats

  • 4.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments