Telegram is giving away FREE Premium subscriptions! All they need from you is to use your cell phone as a relay to text out their OTP codes! And the recipient of the OTP sees your phone number! What could POSSIBLY go wrong with this deal?

PLEASE don’t use Telegram! I personally recommend Matrix as it’s totally FOSS, you can self host, there are tons of front end clients to choose from. Or even use Signal. I have my own issues with Signal, the fact they don’t allow third party clients, you can’t self-host, they have a proprietary shim in their stack that only they know what it does, they were pushing crypto, etc, but at least Signal is better than this garbage.

62 points

People in the privacy community need to get over the unrealistic dream that regular people will adopt Matrix when we can’t even get them to use Signal. The only way Matrix will have mass adoption is through getting a lot of corporate clients. Then the workers might choose to use it personally too after being familiar with it.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Matrix still doesn’t have a multi account client with threads.

I don’t mind Matrix, but every time I bring this up to a hard core Matrix defender to how the clients are lacking, they don’t have much to counter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m writing a new Matrix client that’s focused specifically on being a Discord-like dead simple experience for professional people – it’s under GPLv3 and written in pure Dart

Probably will have the first actual release in one to two months – please tell me what you would like in terms of features so I can shove it into my already massive backlog

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

A client that is basically a ripoff of Telegram would be ideal for me, for what it’s worth

Main features I like are replies, reactions to messages (also double tap to react with a default emoji), and that view where you can open a chain of replies like it’s its own conversation (I’m assuming this is what is meant by “threading”/“threads”)

Lastly, maybe the uncompressed and compressed photo/video options if that’s not already a thing

If it had the above I would probably like Discord style too

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Would quick circle video messages be possible to implement on the matrix?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Being able to support threading would be nice, a lot of clients don’t have that feature, spaces too would also be nice. Also the E2E encryption is a must since a lot of Matrix communication have it enabled by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Gajim, Dino, Conversations support multi-account clients. Threading doesn’t tend to work the same way tho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Threading doesn’t tend to work the same way tho.

Indeed

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sometimes even anything other than SMS kn the US because ppl just assume everyone have iPhones

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Far from the truth. Most of my U.S. friends own androids.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My entire extended family only has iPhones and my wife and I are the only ones with android, gotten a lot of them on telegram to be able to have large group chats working well for everyone to have a good experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

I imagine SMS authorisation texts are Telegrams biggest single expense, they are for Signal https://signal.org/blog/signal-is-expensive/

Telcos know that authentication is about the only remaining use case for SMS and are not going to turn down the revenue stream.

That said this idea from Telegram sounds absurd. Not least I expect most contracts prevent reselling free SMS’s like this. The security implications have got to be significant too.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Telcos know that authentication is about the only remaining use case for SMS and are not going to turn down the revenue stream.

And it can’t die fast enough, as it’s essentially the same as broadcasting your sensitive information over unencrypted radio.

Apart from security, phone number based user identification is such a half-assed approach and I still don’t get why Signal wants to die on that hill. It’s inconvenient, yet trivial, for anyone to register a second, third or tenth phone number. With a bit more knowledge and inconvenience, even anonymously. It adds so little.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s pretty drastically harder to register 100 phone numbers, especially in your target region, than 100 email addresses. Major spammers and such work with automation across many accounts, this isn’t designed around someone with 10 accounts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They accept VOIP numbers, so… not really that much harder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

Wow, that’s super sketchy.

I’m trying to get my wife to use something decent, and I think Signal is the way to go. It’s focused on P2P communication so it’s a better replacement for SMS and whatnot, but it also has groups so it can also replace MMS. She likes Discord, but I don’t think she’ll be as keen to try out Matrix since she’ll just wonder why I don’t just use Discord.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Try Simplex Chat

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Looks cool, thanks! I’m interested in P2P platforms in general, and this seems like an interesting middleground between P2P and centralized.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It is centralized but it does take security seriously

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

My wife and a few family members use telegram, it’s perfectly fine for using as just a regular chat app, you can join spam or sketchy groups but if you don’t join premium or enable contact access, and generally be smart about using it, etc you will be fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

My wife knows that if she doesn’t use Session, she needs to call me and hope I pick up. Granted, she only uses it with me, but that’s already a win in my book.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

IDK, forcing someone to use a certain app to contact you seems a bit extreme, and something that could cause conflict in a relationship. But that’s just me, I obviously don’t know your situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Could be the case. But we agree that she doesn’t have to use it if she doesn’t want to, and I don’t have to use any of the mainstream stuff if I don’t want to. We trust each other to no end, to the point that our biometrics are in each other’s devices, and we leave them laying around regularly. I can see how that could be a sure way to bring issues into a relationship, but thank God, that’s not our case. As for other people, I couldn’t care less. My kids have no access to devices yet (except their Linux PCs built by themselves), so all is great in my life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Man this is so scuffed! Offering free subscriptions in exchange for using your personal phone as a relay for OTP codes is a recipe for disaster.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Or good old XMPP!

permalink
report
reply
-5 points

XMPP doesn’t support modern features and the protocol is older than some of the people here

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It has more “modern” features than Simplex 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Define “modern features”?

HTTP is old too, what’s your point? It get’s constant updates via XEPS, and currently runs: WhatsApp, Messenger, Zoom, iMessage, and more. It’s perfectly capable. And offers federation out of the box.

The single reason XMPP died off in the tech crowd is that Signal killed it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I was wondering about that the other day. Why did Jabber/xmpp not evolve further into the mainstream? For a while there were multiple good-enough clients and running ejabberd was not very difficult. I thought it would become ubiquitous (and in a way it has, just not interoperable), and the clients would evolve to become great. Instead it feels like the whole ecosystem kinda just faded away.

I remember why we switched away from Jabber (running ejabberd) in our company: the biggest issue was no server-side history, so using multiple clients on multiple devices was basically impossible, just like MUCs without history to browse and search were useless for our use cases. Has that gotten better over the last 10 years?

We switched to self-hosted Rocketchat, so which sucks in many, many ways but feature-wise it offers everything we were missing from xmpp.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Privacy

!privacy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 77K

    Comments