42 points

I mean, what do you want? The rotor on the bottom?

Nobody patent that, it’s mine!

permalink
report
reply
6 points

It’s magic carpet time!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Good luck disembarking with the motor running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

China doing what it does best: imitation! I don’t even mean that in a bad way, it’s impressive how well they’ve honed that skill.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

I’ve had several graphic designs stolen and hosted on Chinese sites for screen printing

I know people who have had people get in contact with them after finding their artwork on any one of a dozen sites for sale making bank, while the artist sits in the dark eating ramen for the 6th month in a row.

It’s not impressive. It’s shitty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Copying weapons is a completely different thing from an ethical and technical difficulty standpoint over reselling digital art.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Right, I think they have a little bit of everything going on. But even if this was stolen from whatever data breach, they’d need some competent engineers to make it work. Just as much as they may be stealing art, they are immitating a lot of foods that look just like the real thing, and a lot of times for legitimate purposes like store displays. Screw the people who shamelessly steal but give credit where it’s due.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Reverse engineering is a skill. It’s not something we should reward, but it’s something we should respect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Copying military designs because you can’t come up with your own isn’t impressive lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If it works, it works…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Citation needed on Chinese weapons “working”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

It’s smart to start with a design you know that works first, and then afterwards unique r & d projects can build on good foundations, since getting the first design woking tested their design and engineering pipeline

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

“I’m sorry sir, the patent for a flying machine with a large rotor on top and the smaller rotor behind is currently rejected for being too broad”

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I’ll be honest, to me it looks more like a Mi-28 than an AH-64

permalink
report
reply
2 points

The main rotor is definitely looks like a hind’s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nice find! Didn’t even notice that. It’s five bladed, and it spins counterclockwise, like Eastern helos. I wonder how it flies compared to an Apache. The five bladed rotor gets a Mi-24 up to a faster top speed than an Apache, despite weighing 50% more.

permalink
report
parent
reply

NonCredibleDefense

!noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

Create post

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a “credible” source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it’s non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don’t care if you’re Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don’t want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how “open source” and “easy to find” it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody’s art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art’s source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a “haha people that I hate died… haha” punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments