50 points

0GB!

permalink
report
reply
26 points

That was the cheapest option. 🤭

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I just thought it was funny that they put it on a big sticker on front of the box instead of something like “storage not included” in small print somewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I appreciate it. The modern world has destroyed my attention span. But I wouldn’t even need to be awake to read that one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Came to post the same. Seems like the most awkward possible way to phrase that.

Your “Disks not included” suggestion, or heck, just “empty” would surely be better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Oh no.

Unfortunately I have a lot of experience with this: attaching permanent array members via USB is a bad idea. OP, if it’s not too late, and assuming you haven’t already and decided to double down on yolo, I’d recommend reading about the downsides of this approach. It is easy to find relevant discussions (and catastrophes) in r/zfs.

Thunderbolt enclosures are a bit more expensive, but they won’t periodically fuck up your shit just because.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Thanks for the warning ⚠️🙏

This isn’t my first rodeo with ZFS on USB. I’ve been running USB for a few years now. Recently I ran this particular box through a battery of tests and I’m reasonably confident that with my particular set of hardware it’ll be fine. It passed everything I threw at it, once connected to a good port on my machine. But you’re generally right and as you can see I discussed that in the testing thread, and I encountered some issues that I managed to solve. If you think I’ve missed something specific - let me know! 😊

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Is it because USB doesn’t expose proper UUIDs or something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Bus issues usually. Having a disk (or 4) drop out of a ZFS filesystem regularly isn’t a good time.

If you can find a combination of enclosure, driver/firmware and USB port that provides you with a reliable connection to the drive then USB is just another storage bus. It’s generally not recommended because that combination (enclosure, chipset, firmware, driver, port) is so variable from situation to situation but if you know how to address the pitfalls it can usually work fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

You want ASMedia ASM1351 (heatsinked) or ASM235CM on the device side 🥹

This box has 4x ASM235CM and from the testing I’ve conducted over the last week it seems rock solid, so long as it’s not connected to the Ryzen’s built-in USB controller. It’s been flawless on the B350 chipset’s USB controller.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Been on USB enclosures using Linux software raid for 20 years and never lost a bit so far.

Didn’t go cheap with USB jbod, and i have no idea if zfs is more sensitive to USB… But I don’t use zfs either so don’t know.

But again I have been using two jbods over USB:

  • 4 SSDS split on two RAID1s on USB3
  • 2 HDDs on RAID1 on USBC

All three raid are managed by Linux software raid stack.

The original one I think I started in the 2000’s, then upgraded disks many times and slowly moving to ssds to lower heat production and power usage.

Keep them COOL that’s important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What an assertion - if you’re not using ZFS, how do you know you’ve “never lost a bit so far”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I go to my disks and count my bits every morning, the total is always there, never lost one!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I’ve been on the USB train since 2019.

You’re exactly right, you gotta get devices with good USB-to-SATA chipsets, and you gotta keep them cool.

I’ve been using a mix of WD Elements, WD MyBook and StarTech/Vantec enclosures (ASM1351). I’ve had to cool all the chipsets on WD because they like bolt the PCBs straight to the drive so it heats up from it.

From all my testing I’ve discovered that:

  • ASM1351 and ASM235CM are generally problem-free, but the former needs passive cooling if close to a disk. A small heatsink adhered with standard double-sided heat conductive tape is good enough.
  • Host controllers matter too. Intel is generally problem-free. So is VIA. AMD has some issues on the CPU side on some models which are still not fully solved.

I like this box in particular because it uses a very straightforward design. It’s got 4x ASM235CM with cooling connected to a VIA hub. It’s got a built-in power supply, fan, it even comes with good cables. It fixes a lot of the system variables to known good values. You’re left with connecting it to a good USB host controller.

WD PCB on disk

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I imagine if someone had to do it this way for whatever reason, Thunderbolt would be more reliable? Assuming it’s true Thunderbolt using a SATA bridge?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes - and unless you treat each enclosure as its own failure domain, it will still be a compromise, but it’s a lot better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What are you putting in them?

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*
  • 8x 8TB in a set of 2, some shucked WDs, some IronWolfs
  • 5x 16TB in a set of 2, “recertified” WDs from serverpartdeals.com
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Sweet, just backing up the family photos then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

And probably a bunch of Linux ISOs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

What are you connecting them to?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Two machines. A main server/workstation and a small off-site backup machine that runs the same services but hass less compute and RAM.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You should take a look at getting sas enclosures. They’re pretty cheap, like $200 for a 16 bay. That will be so much more reliable.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I thought about it, but it typically requires extra PCIe cards that I can’t rely on as there’s no space in one of the machines and no PCIe slots in the other. That’s why I did a careful search till I stumbled upon this particular enclosure and then I tested one with ZFS for over a week before buying the rest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That makes sense. I’m a lazy guy and I didn’t want to try testing so I went with a known quantity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Here’s the box test thread if you’re curious. 😊

permalink
report
parent
reply

Selfhosted

!selfhosted@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we’re here to support and learn from one another. Insults won’t be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it’s not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.3K

    Posts

  • 71K

    Comments