141 points

I tend to always give the underdog the benefit of the doubt in these cases.

Remember when a lady suffered third degree burns from coffee at a McDonalds drive through? Everybody made fun of her but she was right, she won in court, and McDonalds had to retrain staff and change how equipment was operated at every single location.

permalink
report
reply
111 points
*

And she didn’t even ask for the massive compensations she eventually got, she only asked McD to cover the medical expenses, as she had to spent a fair amount of time in a hospital because of the burned crotch she had.

Not unreasonable by a mile, but after that case, corporations have tried making pretty much all lawsuits against them seem completely ridiculous. I wonder why…

That said the dude in the photo does look guilty af.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Third degree burned crotch too. It wasn’t just a little too hot and she got a little burn. It was extensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Yes, literally life-threateningly bad burns. Not just an owie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Melted labia. They gave her so much money because of course they did, the lady’s labia melted and McDonald’s had been warned before

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

That’s how shitty they are, they wouldn’t even pay the medical bills when they knew that their coffee was way too hot. They knew it was way too hot because their guidelines said to make it too hot to mask how bad it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Agree strongly.

However the reason they used such hot water to create coffee was that using 98C water to make coffee gives you more coffee from the same amount of coffee grounds than using the recommended 90C. Shittier coffee yes, and hotter, but more of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Come on, don’t sugarcoat it. She suffered third degree vagina burns and a fused labia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

That lady had polyester pants melted deep into her skin.

Liebeck was wearing cotton sweatpants, which absorbed the coffee and held it against her skin, scalding her thighs, buttocks and groin.[

I doubt her settlement paid all the bills, especially after attorney fees

Edited because I was wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._McDonald's_Restaurants

In the end it was apparently $640 000, so I honestly don’t know whether it would’ve covered medical costs and attorneys fees in America.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

It was in the 90s. It was bad then but not nearly as bad as it is now.

640k was worth a lot more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hi thank you. I was wrong about the polyester pants, and I edited my post, to reflect that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-37 points
*

She wasn’t right but she did win in court.

She spilled on herself. Her own fault.
You’ll never change my mind.

Idc about mcds. Stupid is stupid. Her action her consequences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

You know nothing about what happened and you are objectively wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

You were lied to by capitalists with willing and eager help from the news empires.

https://www.ttla.com/?pg=McDonaldsCoffeeCaseFacts

I’m sure that’s the only time that ever happened.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The coffee was hot enough to cause life threatening burns and there were many cases of complaints and damages across the nation until they changed their policy. Now they serve coffee at a temperature humans can consume, and the lid is always tightly secured. She wasn’t even suing for money, the court awarded her money she didn’t ask for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

There’s no way of knowing what happened there.

But back in the mid to late 2000’s we had a whole bunch of residential internet customers and every so often one would blow their traffic cap by a bunch and would ring up and say “Your billing system is wrong!”.

Then whoever could be bothered in the office would do some modest analysis on their netflow data and come up with something like "18% of your traffic this month was redtube.com, 33% was pornhub.com and 9% was xhamster.com.

We never knew if whoever was on the phone was the raging porn addict or it was one of their associates. Either way they would say “Oh well, I guess we will never know then. Thanks for your help. Bye.”. Followed by them quietly paying the bill.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

You actually stored that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Current ISPs have to by law. Just incase you go on howtobeaterrorist.com and need to be stopped. It’s not overstepping at all. Definitely not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You know, I would also like to beat errorists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I just tried that url and it’s down

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

ISPs still can track your online activity, it’s up to them whether or not they will store it

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Yep, any time you have a traffic cap or bill for traffic you’ve got to have data to back up what you are billing for.

More recently CDN’s ( and widespread SSL adoption ) have made it a whole lot less obvious what sites the user is going to. I suspect that nice clearcut list of porn sites from 2007 would just look like some cloudflare, akamai and google these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

That’s the face of a man who thought she wouldn’t take it this far

permalink
report
reply
36 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They both know each other knows, but at this point, throwing in the towel is going to hurt their pride too much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*
  1. This joke is old and tired. Stop making it.

  2. That bloke looks like he doesn’t even know HOW to order porn over the TV.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I honestly don’t know of a bigger incentive driving people to learn tech, than porn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I learned because of videogames but that was also before puberty so…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He’s been mastering this look to trick fools like you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What joke?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

ok I got this, just keep calm and give them your most disappointed look, I can do this.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Daily mail sadface

permalink
report
parent
reply

Casual UK

!casualuk@feddit.uk

Create post

Casual UK

A casual place for banter and anything that doesn’t fit in anywhere else.

Have chat and a natter. Talk about anything and everything that’s not political!

Keep it casual.

Rules

  • No politics.
  • Be friendly.
  • Be kind & civil.
  • Follow Feddit.uk site rules.

Other communities:

Here:

Elsewhere:

Community stats

  • 979

    Monthly active users

  • 287

    Posts

  • 3.2K

    Comments