15 points

It ain’t no fun when the bunny’s got the gun.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Slava Ukraini. Now to deliver more of those F-16s for Ukraine.

permalink
report
reply
-104 points
*

The heat wave is causing potentially disastrous issues for US infrastructure, but sure, absolutely, let’s go further into debt for another country’s war. Ukraine should absolutely be the priority when it comes to appropriations.

At least it’ll make the chickenhawks happy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

It’s not “another country’s war”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-48 points

It absolutely is.

And it’s frustrating watching the extent to which our country is neglected in order to pursue ventures like this over, and over, and over again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Most of what we’re sending isn’t money, it’s assets. Assets that were constructed to fight China and Russia at the same time if needed. They were literally built and maintained in waiting for a fight with Russia. Sending them to make Russia weaker lowers the stockpile we need to maintain. The number of dollars sent over isn’t real dollars, it’s the value of assets (at the date of construction, not after technology advanced). We were literally spending money to keep them ready in case they were needed, and now they’re needed and we no longer have to spend money on them.

We are spending some new money on aid and things, but most of the military stuff is stuff we already had kicking around, not new spending to build new stuff to send over. Also, sure we’ll have to replace some, but we would anyway as technology advances, and it also won’t be to the same level as Russia is weaker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Most of what we’re sending isn’t money, it’s assets.

Err… what? Who paid for those ‘assets’? Those ‘assets’ can’t be liquidated for capital?

Lol, 35 upvotes. Man, this next generation sucks. Not a critical thinker among you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

it’s the value of assets (at the date of construction, not after technology advanced).

Arguably much of it should be valued at negative monetary value as with Ukraine taking it the US won’t have to pay to decommission it. Especially ammunition gets expensive (tanks you can just dump in a desert somewhere).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

In some ways it’s a great move beyond the human cost, Russian uses up their military personnel, equipment, and resources while NATO and the US commit some of their resources and older equipment to the cause but nothing new and no losses of people beyond the Ukrainians in theory for the most part.

I know many in the US think the Russians are good guys now (Patton is probably doing cartwheels in his grave at the thought, but Nazis are good now too so maybe not) but if there is going to be future conflict, the Russian machine will be spent and tired which will help some.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

No losses of people, beyond THOSE people…kinda? Maybe? Theoretically?

Shame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We can always tax the rich to solve our problems.

It’s not that the money isn’t there, lol. We just choose not to use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points

I’m no fan of Russia

But at the same time I’m no fan of nuclear war either.

The escalation of the war has to stop or else we will all feel the fallout of this war.

permalink
report
reply
14 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

Stop financing the war … if everyone is spending billions on a war machine to just fight -> then there will be endless fighting

if you stop the financing and instead spend a few million on peaceful resolution, negotiation and just simply talking, the fighting will stop and there will be resolutions … it won’t be a simple fix, there will be complications, disputes and wins and losses by both sides (everyone can argue the details about it in whatever way they want) … but the end result will be an end to the fighting.

Otherwise, if everyone keeps wanting to spend billions on fighting … the fighting will never end.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There were Nazi appeasers back in the day as well.

You are no better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

So you want Ukraine to just capitulate? Just to satisfy your “peace at any cost” desires? Because Russia sure isn’t going to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Russia isn’t going to risk the world launching a dozen nukes at them just so they can launch one at Ukraine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

As much as that makes sense and everyone probably agrees … then why are western nations hedging their bets that the other side won’t launch a missile, even as they escalate the fighting.

That is Russian Roulette on a global level if you ask me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The problem is really alternatives. Give into Russias demands and they will do the same again soon. It will also send a message to China for example and make war more likely in the long run.

What kind of peace agreement would you see possible?

Btw if you’re interested on the topic of the risk of nuclear war related to Ukraine there’s a good video by Lonerbox in which he also explains the logic of the side you’re arguing with here in more detail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

I’m pretty much a dove through and through with one exception: you must be able to fight to defend the sovereignty of your country.

It is Russia that started the tension, then the conflict, and then the war. Appeasing a megalomaniac and hoping it will make them more measured is delusional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Then as a peace loving person … why support continued fighting?

Fighting Russia only leads to more war and towards what outcome? Completely defeat, embarrass and throw Russia up against a wall they can’t back out of? They would be forced into a corner where they would eventually use a nuclear option. If they are given the choice between defeat or suicide … they might take themselves and millions of people with them.

I’m all in support of Ukrainian sovereignty and fighting for one’s country … but if it means risking the lives of millions of people around the world … what sense does that make?

If we are capable of financing billions towards violent solutions … why not instead finance billions towards a peaceful resolution?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

“If we are capable of financing billions towards violent solutions … why not instead finance billions towards a peaceful resolution?”

Do you want us to spend billions on an ad campaign asking Russia to please stop invading a country? Uh I don’t know if you are history deaf or not but Russia will not stop, unless it is stopped.

Something we Americans should really stick to is the “we don’t negotiate with terrorists” line. Russia is a terrorist state, and they have proven time and time again they cannot be reasoned with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Then as a peace loving person … why support continued fighting?

Pacifism is when I get to kick people and they don’t do anything about it.

why not instead finance billions towards a peaceful resolution?

…MDMA in Moscow’s water supply something along that line?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Russia’s goal is genocide. If you train were to give up, there will be millions of people put to death and sent to concentration camps in Siberia to die. So they really don’t have any other option. We have seen time and time again Russia commit crimes against humanity including to this day the continued operation of the gulag system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Apart from the other points that have been raised: basically every recent report about Ukrainian troops has gotten a bit in it along the lines of “they’re exhausted and have taken heavy losses, but are in good spirits and willing to fight on”.

Especially if you read what individual soldiers are saying, I get the feeling that this war would not end, even if support to Ukraine where to vanish completely (good luck convincing Poland, the Baltics and Nordics). You’d just get Afghanistan, but the invaders are openly genocidal and don’t give a fuck about civilians at the best of times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

🥱

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Good. Make Russians be afraid and push them to turn on Putin. Something they should have done 20 years ago.

permalink
report
reply
94 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
59 points

The use of drones in this war is fascinating from afar.

From an American perspective, I keep seeing calls from extremists for a new civil war, and it terrifies me because weaponry like this means shit will go poorly for civilians VERY quickly, even without going nuclear. I imagine that all these kids and young adults who think that playing CoD prepared them for actual war will be in for a big, brief surprise when a drone just deletes them while being operated by some guy in, like, Nevada.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

With respect to grenades from drones… you might be right if the Russian tankers didn’t have the turret hatch open practically all the time because of how little air circulation they get.

They’re so uncomfortable in their tanks they’re dying from a weapon they should be nearly immune to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Eh drone is just cost effective version of CAS. I think most modern jets bomber/fighter could carry out precision strikes without you ever seeing or hearing them.

Or going in loud and proud A10 style also works, that shit is scarier lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Or going in loud and proud A10 style also works, that shit is scarier lol

It saves infantry, but not the british infantry. It saves infantry, but not the british infantry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Tbh something you can only hear the last second is way scarier 99.9% of the time, because you can’t expect to hear it’s coming. Could happen anywhere any time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Brrrrrrrt

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I take want to see a bunch of Trumpers on mobility scooters waving AR-15s take on the US army. It’ll be hilarious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Or get chased around by explosive FPV drones and Ali-express quadcopters dropping grenades.

And that’s before someone with more resources than Ukraine inevitably makes an airplane load of these things that just automatically go for anything vaguely human shaped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Maybe AliExpress drones is scarier, the fact that it’s so harmless and so lethal is equally scary 😂😂😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 249K

    Comments