Three years ago, lawyer Jordan van den Berg was an obscure TikTok creator who made videos that mocked real estate agents.

But today the 28-year-old is one of the most high-profile activists in Australia.

Posting under the moniker Purple Pingers, Mr van den Berg has been taking on the nation’s housing crisis by highlighting shocking renting conditions, poor behaviour from landlords, and what he calls government failures.

It is his vigilante-style approach - which includes helping people find vacant homes to squat in, and exposing bad rentals in a public database - that has won over a legion of fans.

Some have dubbed him the Robin Hood of renters.

96 points

“If this energy was directed to our MPs and senators, maybe there would be sufficient funding and resources to resolve public housing waitlists,” said a spokesperson for the Real Estate Institute of Australia.

This is the most aggravating part of the article for me. This will force policy change way faster than “putting that energy into pushing representatives.” Which is twice removed from the issue.

He’s helping people find shelter, AND he’s causing a huge stir, taking it worldwide, and making news. THIS is the type of direct action that we need.

Less incrementalism, more fucking over landlords and making the ownership class uncomfortable.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Bugging politicians can work, if you’re sufficiently relevant to re-election. This dude has achieved that relevance very well by doing what he’s doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Sure, but what this stupid fucking association of landlords or whatever is saying is that he needs to “work within the system.” They mean “write to your representatives, vote, donate to politicians, etc.” It’s complete horseshit. Because that clearly hasn’t worked. They don’t want it to work. These people lobby (read: bribe) to make sure the laws keep shifting in their favor. Which is exactly the point. Citizens trying to influence policy are very limited and removed a few steps from the actual decision making and decision makers. They want it to stay that way, because they get to write laws, lobby directly, spend face-to-face time with these people, call their cell phones because they’re large donors, and the winds are blowing ever harder in their favor. Their power grows exponentially while ours dwindles and we become exponentially LESS powerful as lawmakers become more and more insulated from the people they’re supposed to serve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The quotes in here were indeed horseshit, but voting and donating (plus volunteering!), at least, work pretty well. I don’t want to pick a fight with you, but sometimes boring is good. Shit, even insurgencies get pretty paperwork-heavy at any kind of scale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The number of MPs who own investment properties means that this IS going directly to the source, but it’s doing it in a manner that they can’t fob off, ignore, or form a committee about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

I’m not sure if Robin Hood fits. He’s not stealing. Either way, fuck predatory landlords.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Given the abstract nature of a lot of the economy these days (which unsurprisingly benefits those with wealth) it’s debatable if it fits to be honest. I would lean more towards yes. They would argue that by exposing bad conditions, helping people lower the cost, causing a rental to go empty, or whatever else means they aren’t getting the money they feel entitled to.

The same kind of arguments are often used when corporations argue that piracy is stealing. All that has happened is an unauthorised copy of a movie/etc had been created. Yet that is called stealing and they try and fine people sometimes thousands more than what a legal copy would cost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Illegally appropriating access is close enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-54 points

He’s encouraging squatting, which is stealing. He’s an awful person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Found the landlord.

If there is an empty house,and they aren’t doing damage, no harm no foul.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Well, it’s trespassing, but I’d argue it should be a crime to own a house and leave it empty. They should have it rented at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Forcing bad landlords to fix their properties, go for it.

Squatting yeah no. Get the f out

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

How is this stealing? At most it’s prohibiting passive income on capital investment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Stealing is taking someone’s property without permission. That’s what squatting is. By encouraging squatting, this person is encouraging stealing and that makes them an awful person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

The problem here is that you seem to value your own property rights over the right of individuals to have shelter. Sure, it’s not an ideal situation; in an ideal society “squatting” shouldn’t occur, but we live in a society where people are forced to choose between being homeless or squatting in someone’s property. If you think they should forgo their right to shelter to preserve your right to property then you are the awful person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

No name calling on this sub. You are blocked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You’re an awful person. Stealing is what capitalists use land ownership for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

No name calling on this sub. You are blocked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There’s entire countries that are on land that wasn’t originally theirs. Stealing isn’t sufficient for evil on it’s own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think you dropped your /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

LOL - Reported as “not world news”, where the definition is “news outside the US.”

Being as this is Australia and Australia is outside the US…

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Is Australia inside the world, though? 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s more ON the world. I think it’s kinda like the world’s cummerbund, with Antarctica being either the world’s pants or slippers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I thought it was underneath.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s New Zealand you’re thinking of, it’s only there some of the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Its natural predator is the cartographer

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

IT’S BBC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*

Can someone explain all this “everyone is good but straight white men in America” bullshit to me? How is the world “everything but America”? Why is racism anything possibly negative about a race except free range on white people? Why is it that I’m so privileged that I’m not allowed in a homeless shelter in a small town because they’re all living in grants for target minorities/disabilities/women/addicts?

If I didn’t know any better, and I don’t, I’d think the world is playing spades and white Americans are the dealer.

World News should be things that concern the whole world and include things originating from space even!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Because there are already communities for American news (News) and American politics (Politics), other communities were needed to give non-US centric news room to breathe.

The last thing anyone wants is another community that’s Donald Trump and Elon Musk top to bottom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

There are already communities for news for literally every country. Why is America left out with North Korea to be excluded?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Can someone explain all this “everyone is good but straight white men in America” bullshit to me?

I think it’s a rather natural reaction to strait white males beeing in power for all of the modern time and therefor beeing the ones that were made to set the rules and, even more importantly, decide what the discourse looks like. Hence the view on women, minorities, non “White” countries, etc is heavily formed by their views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Can someone explain how you went from “This sub is for news about not America, if you want news about America there’s a whole sub for that” to “straight white men are victims of systemic injustice”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It seems like there is a step in between, like, “America is the victim of injustice because it isn’t given priority status in the world news sub that has to be distinct because all the other news subs end up being about America.” Some sort of persecution complex?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

It went to that because you decided to misrepresent what I said. You did that because you don’t have a response for my actual position and needed something easy to attack.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Can someone explain all this “everyone is good but straight white men in America” bullshit to me?

Yes: when you’ve become accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

You specifically are not allowed here because equality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Bro. Go outside.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
9 points

gigachad.gif

permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 302K

    Comments