Something something orwell

35 points

Some good news - this is so on the nose that even the good liberal subscribers are not biting. Most upvoted comment atm:

“It’s a good day for world peace,” - how utterly grotesque. I sometimes wonder if Joe Biden genuinely has no idea he’s going to lose in November.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Holy shit, NYT deleted that top comment to control the narrative. I honestly didn’t think they’d be so bold. It’s gone. The new top comment is:

Good that we have funding for Ukraine. The funding for Israel should go to relief supplies for the people of Gaza and not the Israeli military.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They managed to sell the “Russia bad, Ukraine heroes of democracy” line so well, I wonder if they just are at a loss when it comes to the Palestine narrative. Like they expected everyone to fall in line [yet again] and support a genocide.

Honestly, part of me would have expected the same, though I suppose even libs can only handle so much overt lying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Yes they did expected it to happen, every single time before Usians and usian bootlickers worldwide just lined up to follow US propaganda to the letter. Hell it still do work for everything else, but Isn’treal is just too blatantly genociding people to hide it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

“Mr. Biden’s critics on the left are angry about his willingness to provide more weapons to Israel, though the legislation also includes $1 billion for humanitarian aid that the president said will be rushed to Gaza.”

In what world can ANYBODY spin this in a way that makes sense. This is the most positive take they could manage and they still are literally saying that the US is supplying aid for victims of the weapons that the US is supplying.

You know what US let’s call it even. Just stop sending any more weapons to Israel and we won’t expect you to send any aid, let other countries handle that. There, you save billions!

permalink
report
reply
16 points

the legislation also includes $1 billion for humanitarian aid that the president said will be rushed to Gaza.

How about letting in the dozens of food aid trucks sitting outside Gaza instead of wasting money on these breadcrumbs? Hmm?

permalink
report
reply
18 points

No kidding. Also, spending $1 billion on aid, and $60 billion on weapons to kill the same people, is insane on its face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Do you think the libs who scream “literally 1984” at anything even remotely socialist would ever recognise how blatant their own government is with this stuff?

permalink
report
reply

94.3 b on weapon money

but we sent 1b for the people that can be able to survive! we’re good people!

permalink
report
reply

Community stats

  • 9

    Monthly active users

  • 2.1K

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments