Rotten to the core.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

what a goddamn joke, she has literally NO qualifications to be a judge let alone a judge for one of the most important cases in the history of the fuckin country.

Absolutely pathetic, everybody in the goddamn law profession should be ashamed. Nothing but clowns

permalink
report
reply
16 points

She’s exceptionally competent in one area of law: fucking it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Bought bitch balks behind bench. Film at 11

permalink
report
reply
12 points

she is reaping the every living fuck out of this.

Wonder what she is going to inevitably sow…

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Isn’t that backwards?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

it follows the wording of the original phrase. Which does mean it’s backwards, but i think it’s funnier that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Nope. She’s reaping what he sowed. What comes next is being sown now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Anyone else tired of that smug headshot every news article uses of her? If this woman a recluse? How are there no other photos of her?

permalink
report
reply

I just assume she has resting smug face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s probably the official photo published by the government.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments