A California company is advertising ‘tactical response’ Tesla Cybertruck upgrades for police cruisers, including shotgun racks and sirens.

-47 points

I like that, looks pretty badass

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Adding the “troll” tag to your profile is a wonderful thing I learned I could do

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How do you do that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

(on boost for Lemmy) go to their “about me”, tap the three dots at the top, tap “add tag”. Now whenever I see this person’s comment, I see [Troll] next to their name. It’s hilarious, since they’re such an active lil fella

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

So another tax payer handout to Musk?

Man, he is THE welfare Queen

permalink
report
reply
4 points

OK I hate the guy and this “vehicle” too, but this is a weird take.

Like if they bought Fords or Hyundais or whatever II wouldn’t consider it a handout; not getting why this would be?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Well, basically all Elon does derives a ton of money from the government…

The cybertruck is objectively bad, I see no reason that car would be selected for police use which makes me think the “invisible” hand of the market (ahem, lobbying, bribing, etc) was involved

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I see no reason that car would be selected

Then shouldn’t your objection be with whoever did the selecting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because they’re a notoriously bad design that is prone to failing on every front that Tesla claimed they were the ‘cutting edge’ on. They’re just BAD. The only way Tesla is going to sell out of their production line is by forcing someone to buy them, and it looks like it’s the US military.

I wouldn’t think the same thing for Ford F150s, but I DEFINITELY would if suddenly we started hearing about police suddenly buying Fisher Price cars after hearing story after story of how they break down and leave toddlers stranded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
230 points

I will laugh my ass off when this thing breaks down and catches on fire during their “tactical response” after someone throws a water bottle at it.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

battery fires are not at all common in electric vehicles. this is propaganda

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

On this planet, we have a concept called ‘humor,’ which involves exaggeration and absurdity for the purpose of getting a laugh. I hope this comes to your own world someday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

repeat falsehoods often enough and people believe them, even if you originally mean them as a well-intentioned and obvious joke

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The first casualty of those battery fires is probably going to be someone handcuffed and locked in the back seat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

While the cop is outside after hitting update on the app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I hope they explode

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

I’m going to laugh my ass off when someone figures out how to track them all in real time, and shares it on a publicly accessible website.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
7 points

All cops should be forced to drive them

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 552K

    Comments