materially speaking calculations sometimes change when one person involved is incredibly wealthy. he has surely tried it on with a much larger number than that.

It is a real thing in dating sites and whatnot that many ppl won’t date below a stated height threshold, in that sense it does literally add difficulty. I have been told “x would never date you, you’re too short” on a couple occasions and some other weird remarks over the years. but generally people who are going to filter potential partners by height are generally to be avoided anyway imo

I’m a convert to just noodles being >>> soup and noodles thanks to the Indomie line and other Mi Goreng variants. So, so good and flavorful.

I spend a lot of time around middle-aged-and-up married couples in their homes due to my line of work and the dynamics often seem pretty bleak. Maybe decades make the difference.

I have a source with knowledge of the artist and they are convinced they did this in a deliberately fucked up way just to fuck with the royals.

Thank you!!

I have seen a lot of “oh this is kind of neat” posts on here that I can’t square with the over-the-top Simpsons content.

not that the trial matters at all but lmao at the idea that they found 24 people with (mostly) some kind of media diet and no pre existing opinions about donald trump. no honey you found 24 liars

Toronto’s no better, sadly.

it’s not about that, it’s the fact that most date ideas cost money, and also being on the apps as an average looking man = you need to pay money to be able to shoot enough shots to make 'em worth using.