src

Rclone?

Well, I’m glad. I wouldn’t want to engage with someone as condescending and rude as you, either. The less people talk with you the better.

What’s what suppose to mean? Discounting his opinion because his username has the word Eskimo in it?

Just because something references race doesn’t mean it’s racist.

Not everything is related to skin color Jesus. The world isn’t so black and white.

What a condescending, bratty thing to say. You don’t have to belittle people just because you disagree with them. You can have respectful, mature conversation :)

This is from page 26 of A Game of Thrones by George R. R. Martin.

Anyone can be sexually abused, not just underage people.

Why reply if you have nothing to add?

So it’s acceptable for AIs to generate these sorts of outputs, as long as they aren’t shared online? Sure, the outputs aren’t very tasteful, but they’re certainly not illegal by any stretch.

Why do you think the government should intervene, and what you would even expect them to do? No laws are being broken.

If you somehow forbid AIs from generating this through a national law just because it’s offensive, it’ll open to floodgates to ban 1,000 other things that are offensive. Where do you draw the line? Ban this content from websites like TikTok, sure. But it doesn’t make sense to regulate this from the AIs themselves.

So you would support government limiting an individual’s right to run software on their computer because you don’t agree with what the software outputs?

That’s absolute nonsense. The entire premise of these machine learning models is that they accept any arbitrary input, you would want to neuter that?