Donald Trump is reportedly losing sleep, battling anxiety, and obsessing over his polling numbers as the GOP nominee hopes to hang his hat on any sign that he will return to the White House.

A campaign official told Axios that Trump is asking more questions and pushing his staff to work even more to ensure that he will come out ahead of Vice President Kamala Harris come Election Day.

“Trump’s anxiety is evident in his late-night and early morning calls to aides in which he peppers them with questions on how things are going—and whether they think he’ll win,” Axios reported.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-18 points

Yep. And I think he will win too. I’ve been playing with the ABC/538 and Harris’ chances just seem so slim to me.

I just want to see something reassuring at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

Love how lemmy just toxically down-votes things that don’t agree with their bias.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

… isn’t the downvote button explicitly meant to voice your disagreement with something?

I don’t understand why people complain about downvotes. If you don’t want to see them, join an instance where they’re disabled (like mine).

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Its not that they “disagree” with it per se, its that they want it to not be the case.

Down voting statements of fact because they make you feel uncomfortable is what is actually happening. If they were willing to step in and make or defend an argument; thats a separate case. Lemmy just knee-jerk downvotes things that it doesn’t want to be true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A lot of people try to say you should only down vote poor quality comments that don’t contribute to the discussion.

If every one downvotes opinions they disagree with you just have a homogeneous echo chamber.

Personally, I don’t think there’s any point complaining about it. You can’t hold back that tide.

Honestly I think users on Lemmy are from a very narrow demographic, and to be blunt a lot of users just don’t have a very broad life experience. That being the case I think anyone should expect to have some opinions which are unpopular with other lemmy users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We also downvote stupid comments. Here, have another.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points
*

Reassurance is women are out-voting men by 10pts in early voting.

Fully 35% of black voters say they plan to vote on election day alone.

538 gave 59% odda GOP to take the Senate in 2022.

Not only do these polls have a margin of error, but they are only predictive insofar as their likely voter models are accurate, and registration volatility and GOP crossover support for Harris means they likely aren’t.

There is no evidence that the low propensity incel bro vote is churning out as hoped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I happen to live in a Republican controlled district in one of the swing states. The people who are enthusiastic about Trump are extremely enthusiastic. As in, flying Trump-Vance flags in their truck down a major thoroughfare.

And, the Muslim population here may very well not be bluffing and vote for Trump instead of Harris - or simply not vote at all. The Israel-Gaza issue is HUGE here.

Unless our major city pulls through for us, Trump will win our state.

The odds are also stacked against Harris based on how electoral votes are counted. If you ask me who I think will win the popular vote, I think Harris will win. It’s just that the game is so stacked, and Republican controlled regions are, well, making it hard to vote.

Did I mention SCOTUS is not impartial?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Any Muslim voting for Trump fully deserves the shit that will rain down on their countrymen if Trump wins. That’s literally the dumbest thing they could be doing, even worse than not voting or voting for “Free Palestine”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Does the states name rhyme with bitch again?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Republican voting is up in the places it matters last time I checked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
  • You’re going to see more registered Republicans crossing over to vote for Harris than perhaps any Democrat has previously received.

  • More are voting early, but that’s to be expected given Trump learned from the 2020 mistake of dissuading his voters from early voting. It doesn’t mean greater turnout; it just means the same voters Trump had before are voting earlier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Republican early voting is up, yet early voting numbers split is in line with 2020. That’s not necessarily a good sign for Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nate Silver left 538, but he is still hosting the Monte Carlo model at the Silver Bulletin. That model is putting it right around 50-50 for Trump win vs Harris win. That’s not a polling average… That’s the result of playing a few million elections where the results are based on the current polling average.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Okay and on Election Day 2016 he had it at 60-70% Clinton when I went out to vote. He was very wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He hadn’t counted your vote yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Ugh for the billionth time, he wasn’t wrong. That is not how statistics works. He gave a percentage chance. That’s it. If I say there is a 70% chance Clinton wins, and she loses, that doesn’t mean I was wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think it was right around 35% as you say. Unlikely, but not impossible for Trump to win. If Trump hit a one out of three lucky shot, that should be somewhat surprising, but not too very surprising.

Anyhow, he’s saying this one is an even coin flip.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

He was very wrong

If everytimw you say something has a 30% chance of happening, it never happens, then your models are wrong because they should say zero percent. If you say something has a 30% chance of happening and it happens, that doesn’t mean you were wrong.

It’s shocking how many people don’t understand percentages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Wow, 50/50 split. Bold prediction, Nate!

Nate has been wrapped up in the betting markets, and I’m afraid he’s not the same Nate Silver from 2008.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 446K

    Comments