As a colored dude, it’s hard to explain. I’ve even had white folks say, “Nah man it’s not like that.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-34 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
20 points

If you think DEI is Marxism in disguise you know neither what it nor Marxism actually are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points
*

Actually, I do know, I’ve read enough about Stalinism and Leninism. It’s not a huge leap, then, to connect the equity philosophy to enable redistribution of wealth and resources to the Global south, especially as it relates to Climate justice.

Authoritarianism is still fucked whether the people oppressing you are left or right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lol thinking DEI is somehow parallel to authoritarianism is hilarious.

You might want to work on your reading comprehension if this is the lesson you learned. Making sure a company has a fair and unbiased hiring process or representation of minorities or fair pay and equal equity for stakeholders that are people of color or women, etc etc is a very far cry from some sort of broad wealth redistribution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Your first link really reads as conspiracy theory, Ive yet to meet a Marxist HR department

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

Tbh I thought the same at first, but it’s because it’s distilling so much underlying philosophy to its most apparent application.

https://medium.com/@iskandar.talaei/dei-explained-by-james-lindsay-53dd9cd510d2

Other povs

https://lawliberty.org/the-philosophy-underlying-dei/

https://www.newsweek.com/critical-race-theory-repackaged-marxism-opinion-1599557

In other words, the designers and adherents of critical theory admitted their true intent. Not equality under the law. Not civil rights. Not freedom, liberty and justice for all. Not a better life for racial minorities. Critical theorists admit their intent is to use racial minorities as the vanguard for a Marxist revolution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Stalin was not the best example of Marxism. Stalin was a megalomaniac that killed a political rival that wasn’t a threat just because he once was a threat.

The term kulak was older than Stalin.

And the last part is a bookcase whataboutism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

lol of course, not a True Scot

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As a socialist citizen of a Nordic state, the Nordic model is a wonderful example of socialism in practice. The US, even with full DEI implementation, would be nowhere near as socialist as the Nordic countries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Exactly, socialism is necessary for balancing out some of the adverse effects of capitalism. The Nordic model is a sensible approach to socialism. The Marxists will have you believe that it’s better to die by their guns than by the guns of right-leaning fascists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This might be the most insane take i read all day

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m getting reports on you. It’s a fine line between disinformation that sounds “smart” and breaking the rules. I’m pulling it because it’s not being excellent to the people it effects.

You’re muddying the waters. If you want to have a discussion, stop giving it a volatile label. Regardless of your point, your label has me involved now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fine, this is a touchy subject rn and I don’t want to inflame or troll

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I will watch and see that that’s true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What’s the Kremlin like?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Shut up, Nazi

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

“They hated him, for he told them the truth.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

hahaha thanks for the laugh

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Will being hated make what someone says more true?

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.

Community stats

  • 7.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 45K

    Comments