The Berkeley Property Owners Association’s fall mixer is called “Celebrating the End of the Eviction Moratorium.”


A group of Berkeley, California landlords will hold a fun social mixer over cocktails to celebrate their newfound ability to kick people out of their homes for nonpayment of rent, as first reported by Berkeleyside.

The Berkeley Property Owner Association lists a fall mixer on its website on Tuesday, September 12, 530 PM PST. “We will celebrate the end of the Eviction Moratorium and talk about what’s upcoming through the end of the year,” the invitation reads. The event advertises one free drink and “a lovely selection of appetizers,” and encourages attendees to “join us around the fire pits, under the heat lamps and stars, enjoying good food, drink, and friends.”

The venue will ironically be held at a space called “Freehouse”, according to its website. Attendees who want to join in can RSVP on their website for $20.

Berkeley’s eviction moratorium lasted from March 2020 to August 31, 2023, according to the city’s Rent Board, during which time tenants could not be legally removed from their homes for nonpayment of rent. Landlords could still evict tenants if they had “Good Cause” under city and state law, which includes health and safety violations. Landlords can still not collect back rent from March 2020 to April 2023 through an eviction lawsuit, according to the Rent Board.

Berkeleyside spoke to one landlord planning to attend the eviction moratorium party who was frustrated that they could not evict a tenant—except that they could evict the tenant, who was allegedly a danger to his roommates—but the landlord found the process of proving a health and safety violation too tedious and chose not to pursue it.

The Berkeley Property Owner Association is a landlord group that shares leadership with a lobbying group called the Berkeley Rental Housing Coalition which advocated against a law banning source of income discrimination against Section 8 tenants and other tenant protections.

The group insists on not being referred to as landlords, however, which they consider “slander.” According to the website, “We politely decline the label “landlord” with its pejorative connotations.” They also bravely denounce feudalism, an economic system which mostly ended 500 years ago, and say that the current system is quite fair to renters.

“Feudalism was an unfair system in which landlords owned and benefited, and tenant farmers worked and suffered. Our society is entirely different today, and the continued use of the legal term ‘landlord’ is slander against our members and all rental owners.” Instead, they prefer to be called “housing providers.”

While most cities’ eviction moratoria elapsed in 2021 and 2022, a handful of cities in California still barred evictions for non-payment into this year. Alameda County’s eviction moratorium expired in May, Oakland’s expired in July. San Francisco’s moratorium also elapsed at the end of August, but only covered tenants who lost income due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

In May, Berkeley’s City Council added $200,000 to the city’s Eviction Defense Funds, money which is paid directly to landlords to pay tenants’ rent arrears, but the city expected those funds to be tapped out by the end of June.


You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
40 points

No sympathy, landlords should get real jobs

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Clearly they’re more “real” than the jobs that disappeared during COVID.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So is organized crime, what’s your point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

My point is that landlord is more of a “real” job, if we’re measuring by how essential to society they are, than the BS make-work jobs that most people do.

In other words, jobs that were lost during COVID are less essential (read: “real”) than jobs that were mandated to continue without interruption.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Then what you want is less rental inventory. Because this is how you get less rental inventory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What, you gonna tear down the apartment buildings? You know you can just sell people the deeds to their apartments. That’s already in practice, in places with a shitload less homeless people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You know you can just sell people the deeds to their apartments.

Considering that Apartments are not deeded per unit. No you can’t. You’d have to convert the apartment to condominiums… Setup an HOA (which everyone hates right?) then get everyone to pay into it… etc… You’re not getting away with not paying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

I am sincerely sorry that you don’t care about people’s quality of life and ensuring everyone gets quality housing over your ideology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

ensuring everyone gets quality housing over your ideology.

And yet here you are celebrating poor people getting kicked out of their homes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Less people got housing overall because grifters, not poor people were taking advantage. These largely were people that could otherwise afford it. It led to increased economic and societal barriers to starting new leases.

This policy didn’t dismantle capitalism; it made the existing system more exclusive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Not really their home if they’re not paying for it.

My house is my home because I pay for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

They’re celebrating people who destroy their homes getting kicked out making it easier for other people (who likely need it just as much) to get in instead

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I agree with him and also care that people get quality housing

Which would be easily possible if all the shitty landlords (including corps) weren’t allowed to just hold onto properties like they currently can

We could easily house every homeless person in the US, but we dont

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

We could also build more housing but you’d rather focus on targeting those that already have it making it more scarce.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You should be, because that’s a stupid-ass opinion and something went very wrong in your life (blow to the head as a baby?) that you could ever say it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Your comment literally was just an insult and provided no argument. Why bother? It doesn’t make you look mature.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 7.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments

Community moderators