Matrix is a better discussion platform than Lemmy, as one is messaging focused, and the other is a message board. Why are you against Matrix? There’s nothing to discuss on !postgresql@lemmy.world because as far as that community is concerned, it’s dead.
You call me childish when you were the one that retaliated against the developers by creating rubbish issues? Ironic.
What’s with you and your obsession with China? From how much are accusing people of being pro-china, you sure love being on @lemmy.ml, the instance run by the developers.
You call me childish when you were the one that retaliated against the developers by creating rubbish issues? Ironic.
Actually they were sincere questions. I am not retaliating. I want to know why they are doing it. But you seem to want to avoid that.
it is disturbing how they are behaving and the cult following they are cultivating by having their servers crash all the time to get donations/etc. It’s like someone faking cancer. And you seem to be unable to study the code and see just how easy it was to fix the mistakes they went so far out of their way to not correct.
It is you who thinks such manipulation of an audience, the server installers and the creators of content, is defensible. I watched them cover-up a PostgreSQL question as fast as they could when 0.18.3 report came in on install. It was highly disturbing and bewildering to witness this. Why do they want servers to crash?
Matrix is a better discussion platform than Lemmy,
It was not crashing every 10 minutes of every day due to SQL TRIGGER code that the developers ignored.
Which also makes… Matrix the better discussion platform? What’s your issue against Matrix?
I think Lemmy project creators work 9 to 5, for 4 years, and want to collect money. They do not use Lemmy. That’s my point. They prefer Matrix. That’s my point. They don’t use Lemmy or care that it crashes all the time, they keep adding new features and the server crashing they consider acceptable.
They even brag and boast on Github that lemmy is “high performance”, and that it has “full delete” when these are not factually true and it is low-performance code and does not delete, it crashes on delete. Is it their self-deception or the audience they are deceiving, or both?
