Lemdro.id

-1 points

1 year ago

Matrix is a better discussion platform than Lemmy,

It was not crashing every 10 minutes of every day due to SQL TRIGGER code that the developers ignored.

report

[ - ]

remkit@lemmy.kya.moe

5 points

1 year ago

Which also makes… Matrix the better discussion platform? What’s your issue against Matrix?

report

[ - ]

0 points

1 year ago

I think Lemmy project creators work 9 to 5, for 4 years, and want to collect money. They do not use Lemmy. That’s my point. They prefer Matrix. That’s my point. They don’t use Lemmy or care that it crashes all the time, they keep adding new features and the server crashing they consider acceptable.

They even brag and boast on Github that lemmy is “high performance”, and that it has “full delete” when these are not factually true and it is low-performance code and does not delete, it crashes on delete. Is it their self-deception or the audience they are deceiving, or both?

report

[ - ]

remkit@lemmy.kya.moe

5 points

1 year ago

Again, what’s your point? Lemmy belongs to them, they can do whatever they want with it. Don’t like it, fork it. What’s your goal?

report

[ - ]

1 point

1 year ago

What’s your goal?

a world where peace, love, and compassion are favored by people and people voluntarily support goodness.

they can do whatever they want with it. Don’t like it, fork it.

It’s become clear that what bothers you so much, what you are trying to do is drive off conversation. You care about the machines delivering your content. I actually care that people have self-awareness in the audience of the media they use. Not have blind faith that “fork it” actually is all that matters, and ignore teachers like Marshall McLuhan or Neil Postman who think it is important consumers of media are able to see how their own brain works instead of thinking “fork it” is all that matters, code.

I think audiences could use a website like Wikipedia to do news, instead they favor websites like Reddiit, Twitter, Lemmy where the main focus is to sort by NEW and get FRESH “breaking news” without accuracy. A rumor mill of rushed information that is often inaccurate or distorted for the purposes of selling adverting/marketing/product placement. I don’t think the cost or “fork it” technology of Wikipedia style sites is the problem, I think the issue is audiences have become addicted to and seek out poor-quality information so they can argue about it. A Wikipedia system with edit history and citations would put an end to too many debates and arguments that people seem to seek on rapid “refresh” social media.

I think humanity has gone from the information age to the disinformation age, and I think it is self-destruction, a major war or other self-destruction brewing.

report

[ - ]

remkit@lemmy.kya.moe

1 point

1 year ago

a world where peace, love, and compassion are favored by people and people voluntarily support goodness.

If you were, you wouldn’t be trying to incite conflict by accusing everyone of being pro-China or pro-CCP, or going off on a rant on America’s social media companies.

It’s become clear that what bothers you so much, what you are trying to do is drive off conversation

Well, I’m nice, I don’t want to hurt your brain further by engaging in pointless conversation with you.

You care about the machines delivering your content. I actually care that people have self-awareness in the audience of the media they use. Not have blind faith that “fork it” actually is all that matters, and ignore teachers like Marshall McLuhan or Neil Postman who think it is important consumers of media are able to see how their own brain works instead of thinking “fork it” is all that matters, code.

How the flying spaghetti meatball monster fuck is this relevant to your rant over how you were getting sidelined on GitHub?

I think audiences could use a website like Wikipedia to do news, instead they favor websites like Reddiit, Twitter, Lemmy where the main focus is to sort by NEW and get FRESH “breaking news” without accuracy.

Okay, get off Lemmy then, why are you helping the Lemmy developers to the point of hurting your brain? You are nothing but full of contradictory statements. Nothing is keeping you here, if you don’t want to be here, leave. It is that simple.

report

[ - ]

2 points

1 year ago

if you don’t want to be here, leave. It is that simple.

It’s funny how you are projecting. You do not want ME here, you keep telling me to leave. If I wanted to leave, i would have left But you seem very confused. Simple flippant dismissal seems to be your approach to complexity.

report

Show more comments

[ - ]

2 points

1 year ago

by accusing everyone

"everyone’, yha. You really think Lemmy is “everyone”, or you lie and deceive that at least.

I think people are pro-authority in their religion to books about dead people; It doesn’t even have to be a living China government. Even the machines or an application code can be what you are loyal to. But they like the power, attracted to even the server crashes, spectacle.

Well, I’m nice, I don’t want to hurt your brain further by engaging in pointless conversation with you.

You commanded that I “fork Lemmy”, that I code, that hurs my brian too. But you lack comassion and enjoy mocking weakness.

report

[ - ]

2 points

1 year ago

How the flying spaghetti meatball monster fuck is this relevant to your rant over how you were getting sidelined on GitHub?

Do you even know who Neil Postman is, is that why you think nothing is relevant to how Lemmy is run? That would explain why you think it isn’t relevant, because you never heard of Neil Postman. He did die decades back, so it wouldn’t surprise me. It must be easier for you to jsut give flippant replies “how the flying fukc” instead of actually learning or reading a book from Neil Postman.

“Fork it”, “wtf”, you like simplistic answers to difficult problems. Clearly you would not spend hundreds of hours testing fLemmy and watching the developers before posting something like I did this past few days. It’s really sad to see your total faith and blind faith in action.

I can see why you might have never read something from Neil Postman and responded as if it was off-topic to social media applications and their cultures.

report

Show more comments

[ - ]

pjhenry1216@kbin.social

1 point

1 year ago

If you have the answer, and have had it for over a month, create the PR for it. Why is that an insult to you?

report

[ - ]

2 points

1 year ago

If you have the answer, and have had it for over a month

Why can’t you say the same thing about the Lemmy developers? They are the ones who installed the mistake. now suddenly others have to fix their mistakes for them? It’s really odd how you deflect from their responsibility.

report