What an utter piece of shit.

406 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
134 points

I think technically they’re more “terrorists” than “rogue nations”

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I mean 9/11 was performed by some rich family member.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Are you referring to the coordinators or the person who knew about it but let it happen so he could go back and finish daddy’s war?

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Frankly I am mad that people are only seeing this now.

Between billionaires and trillion dollar companies, many of them are richer than most nations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Easiest solution in the world is to treat them to the guillotine

permalink
report
parent
reply
234 points
*

Is this not treason? Like legitimately, technically.

permalink
report
reply
178 points

It may be a violation of the Logan Act, which makes it illegal for private citizens to interfere with foreign relations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
101 points
*

The Logan Act deals with private citizens negotiating with foreign governments. Unless he fucked with Starlink at the direct request of the Russian gov’t, I don’t see how the Logan Act applies. EDIT: apparently he did it after speaking with Russian government officials. So never mind, Logan Act is absolutely implicated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

*Foreign governments having a dispute with the United States. I don’t think this qualifies. Unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

Against Ukraine certainly, but since he’s not a citizen of Ukraine, then no. If these were US forces that he sabotaged, or the US was actually fighting in the war then it would also qualify, but once again that doesn’t apply. It definitely runs counter to US foreign interests, but that’s not enough to qualify (and probably good it doesn’t, a LOT of stuff people regularly do it could be argued would run counter to US foreign interests).

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

He did this with federal funds. And the US hasn’t declared war since, what, WW2? The Rosenbergs were executed for treason, and we never declared war with USSR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

The Rosenbergs were executed for treason

Espionage, actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

The Rosenbergs were convicted on espionage charges. They were sending classified info to the USSR. That’s different from treason although it’s related. The funding angle is an interesting question though. It still wouldn’t be treason, but it could qualify as… breach of contract maybe? Not sure exactly what the charge is when the government pays you for a service and you don’t fullfill the service in a satisfactory manner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He did not actually do it with federal funds. These were donated Starlink terminals and service was paid for by SpaceX.

That’s the whole point, the US government allowed civilian technology to be used in war by a foreign government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He did this with federal funds

Apparently this was before he got federal funds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Uh… People from Vietnam, Korea, and Afganistan would like to differ. (not an exclusive list).

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This reeks of espionage. With a slight hint of war crimes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

This has nothing to do with being Ukrainian, but everything to do with being American, and actively working against American interests and official national and White house policies.

He is actively working against the support USA is providing, and has paid him for, and has ordered him not to sabotage or diminish.

This is treason, which is logical, since Elon Musk is a Trump supporter and they are both traitors and Elon Musk is a pedophile Nazi.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

While I think we can all agree that it’s treasonous or at least treason adjacent, it however does not meet the specific legal definition of Treason used by the US. Like most of the rich and powerful he’s threading legal loopholes to do what he wants without actually violating the letter of any laws while simultaneously stomping all over the spirit of them. There’s a strong argument to be made that he is committing sabotage against Ukraine, but once again that’s not technically illegal in the US. I don’t even think Ukraine has an extradition treaty with the US, so even if Musk was charged and convicted in Ukraine, there isn’t really anything they could do about it.

At the end of the day, Ukraine fucked up by trusting and relying on a private contractor for their critical infrastructure. They were in a bind and needed a solution so they leapt at the first one that was dangled in front of them, but it was a hasty decision that has bitten them in the long run. For better or worse there’s a reason that no nation relies on infrastructure they don’t control for military support, and it’s exactly this situation. Even if the hardware was manufactured by a contractor, they would make sure their country was the ones in control of it. Starlink should have been at best an emergency stopgap while Ukraine found another long term solution specifically because it puts their military at the mercy of the whims of a foreign national (not to mention the operational security nightmare where now they have a private US corporation able to literally watch and track their military movements in real time).

Elon Musk is a pedophile Nazi.

While I think Musk is a slimy piece of shit that’s made a career out of stealing credit for other peoples ideas, this might be going too far.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The US government never paid him to provide military service in Ukraine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Treason is very narrowly defined in US law. The US is not at war with Russia, and the US is not Ukraine, so no, it’s not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sedition?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Again. The US government is not the Ukrainian government.

The most painful thing the government could do would be to sanction Musk and his companies for taking actions counter to US foreign policy prerogatives, but then Musk would just pull the plug on Starlink altogether. So nothing will be done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Also no. Americans do not legally owe any loyalty to the Ukrainian government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nope, he wasn’t trying to overthrow the government of country he is a citizen of. He could be considered a non state actor though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
211 points

It’s cute how if Ukraine fights back that risks nuclear war, but when Russia invades a sovereign country it doesn’t

permalink
report
reply
4 points

It’s like the rule of money, but with nukes: those who have the money/nukes, make the rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I’ll probably get downvoted to hell but America’s done that for hot minute now and also evades any real criticism from the West. And yes, Russia bad and invasion bad, no question but if we’re keeping score…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Fuck Woodrow Wilson. Wilsonian Doctrine wasn’t even close to the worst thing that shitstain caused while president.

Worst. President. Ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In what conflict were people criticized for fighting back against the US because it could cause a nuclear war?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

More referring to the invading of countries without criticism, long ass history of doing that in the name of “freedom”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-53 points

Ukraine doesn’t have nukes

permalink
report
parent
reply
154 points

Not anymore. They gave them to Russia under guarantees they wouldt do… pretty much everything they are doing right now.

I’m starting to think Russia might not be trustworthy…

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Yeah, in the mid 90s the world was so optimistic about Russia, and frankly reassured about the nukes going to Russia, which was believed to be the more confidently governed nation state.

Everyone was still riding high on the cold war seemingly coming to a close.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-74 points

Too bad so sad! Should have been smart like Kim Jong. Keep some nukes and you don’t get invaded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That doesn’t address the previous claim in any manner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I think he addressed it clearly enough. Russia invading Ukraine has no risk of Ukraine starting a nuclear war. Why? Because Ukraine does not have nukes.

A country like Russia, if facing an existential threat, has the capacity and incentive to use nuclear weapons. Why? Because they have nukes.

This is why even the US had hesitations last year (same time this Starlink episode happened) about sending certain types of weapons to Ukraine - out of fear of nuclear escalation. Now that Ukraine has drone striked Russian territory a few times it seems obvious because nuclear escalation hasn’t happened… but Musk was not alone in thinking this. Remember that US refused to give all sorts of weaponry at first. They didn’t want to give fighters jets, tanks, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
180 points

Hang on… That’s sabotage. Straight up. That’s a criminal offence no?

permalink
report
reply
63 points

Yes. Assisting putler’s genocide against Ukrainian children is a war crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

Yep, but he’s rich. I fully expect nothing to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Yeah. According to the article, he straight up told the top military brass of the Biden administration right afterwards and they did nothing. No prosecution, no whistle-blowing to the press about a war crime. Nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

What do you suggest they do?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Check his party affiliation

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

What

permalink
report
parent
reply
-45 points

For what countries laws? He’s not a Ukrainian citizen

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

So if you’re not an American you’re free to sabotage the US as much as you want and it’s not a crime?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

So if you’re not an American you’re free to sabotage the US as much as you want and it’s not a crime?

Two points.

First, US laws apply on US soil, or to US citizens. If you’re neither, then cooperation and extradition agreements apply, if there are any.

Second, not sure where you got the “sabotage the US” part from:

  • the request came from Ukraine
  • from the beginning, Musk has been sabotaging Russia by disabling Starlink outside of Ukrainian borders, this was supported by both Ukraine and the US
  • the Ukrainian request was for removing part of the sabotage so Ukraine could attack Russia with Ukrainian drones
  • it wasn’t a US request, it didn’t involve any US assets, or any US operations

Maybe Ukraine should have asked the US, instead of asking a private non-Ukrainian citizen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Yeah but it’s not called treason, treason is to your own country, ofc this is still an illegal offense in Ukraine but I don’t think it’s treason?

permalink
report
parent
reply
152 points

If he loves Russia so much, we should deport him there, and nationalize all his assets since SpaceX is a critical security apparatus and he’s clearly the foreign agent of a hostile power.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

No no, give him to Ukrain, where they can charge and try him. Hopefully end up with life in prison or something better (worse?). Giving him to Russia just makes him more of a Russian asset.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Or OR we ask him to emerge from the Black Sea in his swim trunks to beguile both sides with his majestic beauty and raw sexuality, thereby ending the conflict and bringing peace to the region

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He looks like Buffalo Bill here: “I’d fuck me!”.

(As Q Lazarus blasts in the background.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

needs less hair transplant

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This right here is why I think he was honeypotted by Russian agents who now have kompromat on him.

Then again, being a greedy douche seems his default mode.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This assumes he provides something of value beyond his money

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Of value or not, he needs to be trotted out in front of Ukrainian justice. Giving him a free pass to live with his Russian buddies is NOT justice and is not a deterrent for others who would also practice such treachery. Stop trying to save him, you Russian sympathizer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments