78 points

Good, should be enforced world wide.

permalink
report
reply
53 points
*

Along with mandatory spay/neuter. Make it a crime to intentionally avoid spaying and neutering cats and dogs.

Oh, you’re a breeder? I used to work at a no kill animal shelter. You’re the bane of my, and every stray animal’s, existence. FUCK animal breeders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Remember folks, adopt, don’t shop. Not only is it just significantly more moral, mutts are far less likely to have health issues from inbreeding that will shorten their lives. You get more time with your four legged loved ones

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

And the pet stores that buy from those breeders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are you confusing ‘breeder’ with ‘pet mill’? Ghetto breeding was horrible to my family involved in animal care and salvation. Actual breeders, though, not so much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I’m talking about anyone who intentionally takes an unneutered male animal and an unspayed female animal and intentionally puts them together to make and sell babies. Especially inbreeders. The only purebred animal that I can accept is sheepdogs, because they aren’t bred for looks, they’re bred for intelligence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I mean, if such a campaign is ever completely successful, along with one for capturing or fixing stray and feral animals, there would need to be some amount of breeding of them or they’d eventually go extinct. Perhaps with regulation on both practices that lead to unnecessary health problems (like inbreeding or breeding for harmful traits like squashed faces) and on numbers to avoid breeding more of a specific sort of animal than there exists demand for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Maybe add a safeguard to it, so that when local animal shelters are at 10% capacity the regulation is temporarily lifted or something. Realistically, it would never be totally successful anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I mean, there’s responsible breading and irresponsible breeding. My mum has always kept setters of both the Irish and English varieties. The breeders she gets them aren’t just pumping endless dogs out for profit, they’re taking good care of the bitches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unless the shelters in your area are consistently well below capacity, it’s still incredibly immoral

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Good luck getting the UK on board, something like 90% of cats are outdoor cats here

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Domestic cats have been in the UK for ~2000 years, and wildcats for >~8000 years.

Their only real predators in the UK are cars and dogs, and most British bird species are well acquainted with cats, and on the whole aren’t at high risk. Recommendations say an outdoor cat is a healthy, happy cat.

The RSPB (bird conservation charity) doesn’t find them a major problem here, but do recommend:

  1. Neuter them
  2. Keep them in at dawn, dusk & night
  3. If they ever kill a bird, put a bell or beeper on the collar

Which seems a reasonable set of recommendations.

On the other hand, the USA and Australia don’t have the thousands of years of history of cats as part of the ecosystem, and they have all these wild dog-type-things and snappy reptile things etc, so the cats are in more danger, and the native bird species are at higher risk. Recommendations say an outdoor cat is a bird-murdering machine that’s about to get run over by a giant SUV and then eaten by drop-bears.

My Eastern European neighbours think it’s weird that we let the cats inside at all. They think they should live entirely outside.

So I guess “different countries, different rules”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Finally some sense in these cat posts

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

More than countries, different ecosystems different rules. Mainland USA and Hawaii have different ecological rules for good reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Doesn’t the US have wild felines of some kind?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

From a UK perspective, it seems unbelievably cruel to keep a cat locked indoors. The hunting instinct is one of a cat’s main drives, so to take that away is equivalent to removing sleep or food. I understand the issues around cats and wildlife in other countries, but I think the solution is to just not have domestic cats rather than trying to imprison them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The answer is to give them toys and playing with them

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I think the solution is to just not have domestic cats rather than trying to imprison them.

I agree, it’s a cruel to keep a cat indoors than to put a goldfish in a very small bowl or feeding an animal vegan food. Unpopular opinion, seeing how fond people are about their furry killers, but it’s the only real way to remedy this problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Not everywhere are cats a problem.

They are literally native to Africa and parts of Asia. In most of Europe they have been held for thousands of years and are not a threat to the ecosystems.

Taking Countries with invasive species as a global role model makes no sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

Yes, cats are not innocent, but let’s keep pretending that humans aren’t affecting biodiversity and just blame the cats. Australians are among the worst offenders on biodiversity problems and climate change, so don’t worry… I get it.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

When you’re the animal in charge, you gotta appeal to the lower animals and take out the competition

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Maybe we should start by making cat owners keep their bird and rodent killing machines inside

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

What if the rodents are not indigenous and are more of a pest than the cats?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Cute response, but cats have cause the extinction of dozens of local animal species in countries around the world

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s literally not possible to be more of a pest than the cats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Are you saying, that, because a human curfew would be out of proportion, a cat curfew is out of proportion, too?

Human petship is by extension human activity, so curbing anthropogenic influence on biodiversity loss might include blaming human pets and thus cats, when those pets contribute significantly (2B animals/a) to biodiversity loss.

Domesticated cats live long, are well fed and are great hunters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

I think the first step is to identify the full impact of Glysophates and other similarly used pesticides, particularly their roll up impacts, then we can start working on secondary effects like cats.

If you take away the cats, rats and mice will destroy 10x more than cats ever could. See Vancouver BC or Easter Island.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We can walk and chew bubblegum at the same time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Stop having kids. Beyond that you’re suggesting human genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I am suggesting no such thing? What I mean is that humans should start doing other things first, clean up their own shit - first reason that there are so few birds is factory farming - overly aggressive use of pesticides killing off insects, machine harvesting chopping up ground nests, land “purchase” destroying forests and animal trek transit zones. Outdoor cats come only in sight because of the one animal kind that does thrive on this: rodents, especially mice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Owning domestic cats is a human thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Outdoor cats are also caused by humans, so this is directly trying to solve a problem caused by the worst offenders

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If cats want to be able to get away with killing native wildlife, they’ve just got to start a mining or logging company and they’re all set.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Australia wants to force cats to have a little tuna, as a treat.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*
15 points

all the other animals in Australia need to step up their game

permalink
report
reply
30 points

*cat owners

And I’m not sure how a curfew is going to work since that relies on cats to give one ounce of shit.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Australian farmers have, unfortunately, had to find certain methods of enforcing curfews on cats. Keep 'em inside, folks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Curfews rely on owners, not cats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Partially. It also relies on the cat listening to the owner when they try to get them inside. Some cats will, but most come when they feel like it. “Like herding cats” has its meaning for a reason.

Pets in general shouldn’t be allowed to roam freely outside. There’s too many dangers to them and things they can do to cause problems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Entirely.

If you can’t keep your cat inside on time, than keep it inside all the time. This is 100% on the owner, they have the capabilities to stop it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Simple, cats that are outside past X o’clock get taken to the RSPCA and they’re put up for adoption after a week without being claimed.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Interesting Global News

!globalnews@lemmy.zip

Create post

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn’t have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 3.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators