376 points

Wow, a hugely wealthy oligarchical capitalist facilitating the rise of fascism?

How completely unpredictable, with no historical precedent whatsoever!

Who could have possibly expected this?!

permalink
report
reply
67 points

Certainly not Prescott Bush!

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points
*

Man… that’s one of the things that seems like a conspiracy theory to a great many people, but just actually is true.

Dude literally got caught doing massive amounts of money laundering for literal Nazis during WW2 and by all rights should have been convicted of treason.

Its like how most people don’t know that IBM machines enabled the Germans to tabulate and keep track of the holocaust, that their machines spit out the UIDs that were tattooed onto the victims at the death camps…

… I think that ‘War is a Racket’ by Smedley Butler really needs to be added to the basic K-12 curriculum alongside 1984 and Brave New World…

But oh oops, the Republicans already destroyed our education systems, nevermind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And definitely not Woodrow Wilson!

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

How much money do these fuckers need before they are content enough to not rat fuck American democracy so they can eek out a few percent more on their billions?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

… The answer is infinity.

Capitalism requires constant growth, constant extraction, constant return in investment, constant tendency toward monopolies and wealth disparity until you end up with a neo feudalistic caste society.

You can either attempt to restrain and regulate the system, which we are currently doing a rather poor job of, overthrow the system, which is nigh impossible given the precarity of the average prole, or you can just watch as we head closer and closer to… some kind of hybrid of the handmaids tale and elysium.

… Or, maybe, escape to a slightly less insane foreign country, but you’re gonna need a lot of money or a very lucrative skill set as an employee to do that as anything other than an illegal immigrant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You know, I always wondered where the professionals ended up in Elysium. Like there are the medical professionals taking care of the earthlings, but the life saving machines are in Elysium so they aren’t needed up there.

But like, what about the software folks? Like there’s an epic shit ton of software going on in that movie that just kind of gets handwaved.

Passification is handled by robots and crazy humans. Other than the one executive who comes down, where are his direct reports? There is no way he was interested in the factory management, that would be a middle management job. And then what about accountants? Researchers designing the tech on Elysium?

It never really made a whole lot of sense that Elysium was just the rich. They can’t just “get” everything they want up there, it had to come from earth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not until they are the god king.

Capitalism eventually turns into feudalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, capitalism is feudalism with loot boxes! Because I could win the lottery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

How much does a single round of ammunition cost these days?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

7.62 x 51mm goes for around a dollar a round.

5.56 x 45mm is about 50 cents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

The motto of the Post is literally “Democracy dies in Darkness”, and it was adopted immediately after Trump was elected. It is deliberately positioned as pro-Democrat and anti Trump. I didn’t have a high esteem of Bezos, but I am still disappointed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Nobody else finds this ominous? Besos was not exactly Trumps friend. Why is he being a bitch now? What does he know what’s changed

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

I don’t know about you, but I get this feeling there is a massive coordinated campaign between the monied interests behind the scenes. The Republican party is unpopular, by a lot. Voters are super pissed off about abortion, and it’s consistently been a losing issue for the GOP that they can’t help but double down on. Donald Trump is a criminal that a not-insignificant portion of the population think should be in prison. SCOTUS is openly corrupt, Kamala pulled in over a billion dollars last quarter, while Trump’s small-dollar donations have all but dried up.

Yes, the wealthy typically support the GOP, but like… why this election are they going so hard for Trump? If Kamala appoints a competent AG, there’s a very real chance Musk gets hit with election interference charges. Bezos had to know that this was going to lose WaPo subs, because the right doesn’t trust WaPo thanks to years of distrust sown by Trump so there was no way this wasn’t going to cause a financial hit. Ditto for the LA Times. So just… why? The whole vibe of the thing just feels off.

Edit: also not to mention the praising Hitler thing, the number of his former staff who are endorsing Harris, the number of former and current members of the GOP who are endorsing Harris, the fact that he’s been adjudicated as a rapist, his obvious sundowning, his “enemies within” remarks, wanting to send the military after his perceived enemies, his desire to see Israel completely obliterate what’s left of Palestine…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Money is stronger than any ethics or morals billionaires pretend to have

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If trump actually…shudder…wins, he could do as he’s said and bring down the fascist military hammer on any type of dissidents. These billionaire ghouls don’t care what happens to the country or world, they just care about their hoard.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

The guy that “gifted” millions to political commentators from CNN tries to influence politics? No way!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Some real bald-headed behavior right here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The world is full of surprises, my friend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
191 points

Has this f*ing idiot never heard of the Streisand Effect? The fact that they broke a decades long tradition to do this makes a louder thump than their endorsement would have.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Louder to people who know who they’re voting for already

Quieter to people on the fence

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He’s not a calebrity reliant on publuc opinion. He doesn’t give a shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
161 points
*

The Washington Post: “Democracy Dies in Darkness”

Bozos:

I had to settle for the Jurassic Park GIF because I couldn’t find the one of Homer Simpson using his gun to turn off the lights. If anyone has that GIF, please hook me up.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

I know this isn’t intentional, but the broken image makes the comment 10x funnier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

LOL. Task failed successfully!

I just re-linked the GIF to go through my image proxy (originally linked directly from yarn.io which usually works fine. Usually.). Did that help?

It’s also weird that it’s not showing the alt text. Figured that’d have at least come through.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Fixed!

Although I preferred when it looked like Bezos yeeted the file.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

No shooting, but does this work?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Democracy Dies in Darkness

We just didn’t realize this was a mission statement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

never ask rexy where she was on january 6

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This episode.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I did find the “watch me turn off the TV” GIF but not not the lights :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Not the one you’re looking for for but

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks!

Yeah, I found that one but it wasn’t quite what I wanted so passed on it and fell back to Jurassic Park.

The painful part is that I have that episode on DVD, so I have access to the scene. I just don’t know how to go from DVD to GIF. lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I searched everywhere and couldn’t find it, so I made it. Has to be my best contribution to the internet

permalink
report
parent
reply
117 points

90% wealth tax is needed

permalink
report
reply
69 points

Anyone with over 10 million dollars in wealth should be legally classified as a dragon and anyone stealing from their hoard shall not be punishable under the law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*

Not so fun fact: The absolute richest dragons in all of fantasy, excluding Smaug, only have a net worth of several hundred million dollars. A Red Elder Wyrm will have, on average, around 2.5-3 million gold pieces of wealth, with an absolute maximum of 5 million gold pieces. That means that the absolute greediest, and richest type of dragon, by far, only has between 100,000 to 500,000 oz worth of gold.

Smaug being the absolute outlier because he had somewhere between 5 to 10 billion dollars worth of gold.

Now if you are wondering why I’m making a big deal about this, it is because 500,000 oz of gold is only worth about 1.1 billion US dollars. But that is the absolute outlier of the greediest type of dragon that there is. Still only looking at Chaotic Evil Red Elder Wyrms, the average would only be about 3.5 million gold pieces, or a mere 350,000 oz of gold. That’s only about $850,000,000 and that is just the most average of the absolute greediest manefestations of greed that our limited minds could imagine. Most dragons would be absolutely fine with between $1,000,000 to $10,000,000. The literal manefestations of greed don’t need more than $10,000,000 according to every treasure table.

Those people that have more than 100 million dollars have already passed the greed alignment chart into Chaotic Evil. They are damn near caricatures of dragons at this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

My favorite is always the Egyptian god deciding to save the equivalent of $10,000 usd every day and never spend a single penny of it back in 10,000 BC and they still don’t have as much money as Jeff Bozos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You need to read up on Shadowrun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Maximum wealth law. Once you’re worth more than 100 million, 100% of any new income goes to a designated fund for social programs.

100 million is enough money that there is still no real limit to how pampered your life can be, so there’s no argument that the rule would hurt anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There is a big accounting difference in use the term “wealth” and “income”, especially when the wealthy take out a loan from stock holdings and not pay income tax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
115 points

Rep. Ted Lieu, a Democrat from California, in his own tweet on the news wrote, “The first step towards fascism is when the free press cowers in fear.”

I don’t know if this is the free press cowering, or the free press being bought out by rich people. Either way, it’s some bullshit.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Private ownership of a news outlet breaks every definition of “free” in “free press”.

A “free press” no longer exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Eh… no? Most free press is privately owned. Just not by billionaires who influence the content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

When Bozos bought it, this was the exact concern, because there is no ethical billionaire. I’m pretty sure he promised to not interfere with the reporting or content. Turned out to be another lying, selfish asshole with more money than he can ever spend… Who could have predicted that? (besides everyone)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So government owned news is better?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

When the billionaires who own the media and the highest level of government are in bed together so long as the government continues to tailor it’s policies to ensure that the wealthy stay wealthy, then the line is so blurred it might as well not exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Maybe non-profit would be best. Incentives to encourage good journalism, but not trying to raise the bottom line every year, chopping costs and spamming mass amounts of AI garbage because I’d bet 100 shitty articles is worth more than 1 good article for their bottom line.

Easy access links to the journalists other works, peer reviews from other non-profit and about me profiles can also help people discern bias.

I’m no expert though, so I’m sure someone has tried it and found making money is better for their paychecks

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Free press is your uncle’s Facebook rants

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

My first reaction was that it was cowering in fear, since trump keeps threatening newspapers. But after thinking about it, why would Bezos give a fuck if trump threatens the paper? He wants his paper to be a trump propaganda outlet because he wants trump to win. Not because he likes trump but because he wants the fascist movement to win so he can get richer (see Blue Origin govt contracts for one thing). Because having hundreds of billions of dollars is simply not enough, so fuck democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 479K

    Comments