17 points

No living thing has a feature “to” do anything. That implies decision making, which is intelligent design.

Tigers have spots on their ears, which can confuse attackers.

Tigers did not develop those spots “to” confuse attackers.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

Yes, they did though. That’s the purpose of this evolutionary trait. I see what you’re getting at, but you seem to be implying this was a concidence

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Every evolutionary trait is coincidence. If it was adaptation we’d be able to regrow vital organs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

that’s not how that works, we cant regrow (most) vital organs (liver says hi) because of “engineering problems” not because evolution is random. we personify adaptations to understand them, it can lead to issues but yours is a massive overcorrection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Adaptation is bullshit? Well that’s a new one…

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

All models are wrong, but some are useful. Thinking of evolved features as having a purpose is wrong, but it is also incredibly useful.

Why do we have eyes? In some sense, there is no reason, just a sequence of random coincidences, combined with a slightly non-randon bias refered to as “survival of the fittest” (itself an incorrect model).

However, saying that we have eyes to see has incredible explanatory power, which makes it a useful model. Just like Newton’s law of Universal gravity. We’ve known it that is wrong for a century at this point, but most of the time still talk as if it’s true, because it is useful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The spots might be helpful for baby tigers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

I hear what you’re saying, and you’re 100% correct, but I think most people will realize it’s a figure of speech, and easier to say than “Via the process of gene mutation trial and error over many, many generations of tigers, spots have developed on their ears that look like eyes, resulting in predation from behind being discourged.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

One way of thinking of it could be that since all of our intention and decision making originates in such a process, the line between them isn’t that clear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
153 points

Hippos

permalink
report
reply
2 points

no ; it’s humans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

This is the correct answer. Why are they so violent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Herbivores have nothing to lose when hands need to be thrown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I just imagined a hippo with hands. Nightmare.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think Africa is a rough biospehere to live in so everything’s gotta be super tough, the Amazon is like that too

permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

They’ve been bullied and fat-shamed their whole lives and they’ve had enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Incel hippos are jealous of good looking tigers getting laid

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well if they’ve had enough they should stop eating.

It will help with the fat

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

To make sure the tigers don’t start getting any ideas

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Not even on the same continent. Hippos are in Africa and Tigers are in Asia. Pretty big desert in between

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The Indian ocean isn’t a desert

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Are you sure? It’s not like you can drink the water. And how much life is there really once you get away from the coastal shelf?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Look, I’m trying to lose the COVID weight, okay? Insults are unnecessary!

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Probably humans, given they went from 100k to 5.6k in population in 100 years and are still in decline.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

That’s not long enough to evolve something like this, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Even arrows or spears wouldn’t have been long enough to develop such a trait. And with those tools, still I don’t think Tiger would have been a primary target for humans. Seems like for most societies felines and canines were just not things we eat. Though maybe hunted for the pelt? In which case maybe they do eat the meat?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Eating a tiger liver would probably kill you with Vitamin A poisoning, a particularly painful affliction.

Easy to just avoid eating entirely, even if the rest of it is safe enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Also statistically (since we’re talking evolution) it wouldn’t help much against humans, we’ve got good vision and intellect, the chances to fool us enough times for this adaptation to arise are slim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Considering evolutionary time scales, this trait may have been a response to something large and dangerous that’s extinct now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Very good point, I didn’t mean to conflate it happened in the last 100 years, more so the data of their deaths that I had access to had that timeliness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Sweet, that’s good to know. WWF needs to update their website. Too many chairs to the face I think.

https://wwf.ca/species/tigers/#:~:text=Sadly%2C tigers are on the,of all remaining wild tigers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i mean i’ll concede that it’s not entirely ineffective, but i very much question that it would significantly affect their survival.

If a human sees a tiger which they know may well kill another human, they’re not going to give a toss about where the tiger is looking, they’re going to have 5 friends with them who all carry the best weapons they have available to turn that tiger into a rug.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Tigers are only CR4. There’s lots of stuff more dangerous that that.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Yeah, you think you’re hot shit as a tiger and then here comes a Hellwasp…

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Or feline AIDS. Can’t fool that with fake eyes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

i always thought it was fucked up that feline aids was CR10, but when you explain it like that it really makes sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If you can’t get it in because you think the back is the front then maybe you can

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Fun fact the South American short face bear is the only Ice aged giant that is thought not to be driven extinct by humans and fact humans could not hunt it, Tigers would be a pleasant snack for them.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Well that begs the question what the hell drove the short face bear to extinction? The long face bear?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why the long face ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Same thing that killed the humans, climate change.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Memes

!science_memes@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 83K

    Comments