It wasn’t just Muslims saying this but okay. Notice they focus on saying it was Liz Cheney and not the Cheneys in general. Can’t help themselves but to imply that Muslims are sexist. Liberals are coming out as full bigots after losing lmao.

27 points

This is opposite of what was supposed to happen. Dems were supposed to have human mask end chuds were supposed to be honest about their blood thirst. Instead, you refused any action against israhell, said you will always supply them, refused to put a Muslim or Arab onto your stage, screamed “I’M SPEAKING” when they protested, closed your ears and laughed at them while they spoke, put warmongers (who were previously called Hitlers) in your cabinet, said trump should have attacked iran in 2020 while trump put Muslims onto his stage, said he was against Bidens actions against Yemen, said chaneys should be shot for being warmongers and very clearly said he opposes wars.

Average person has every right to think libs are pro war and chuds are pro peace

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I saw some photos of Muslims holding “WE ARE NOW SPEAKING” signs

went really hard

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

permalink
report
parent
reply

Any bets on what neocon will the Dems publicity court and brag about next round?

permalink
report
reply
22 points
*

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Nikki Haley

permalink
report
parent
reply

Kissingers ghost will endorse them lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Hillary was openly friends with him, and pretty sure most Democrats at the very least considered him a ”respected elder statesman” or whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ghost requires a soul. It will be an llm based on him running on a rack of gpu’s on the back of a very shiny Boston dynamics robot, and it will not endorse, because it will be the Democratic nominee. His running mate will be nick Fuentes, or a similar llm based on Otto von bismarck and Reinhardt heidrich, to signal both branches of the now dividing right that they’re heard and will have a voice in this new administration. Everybody gets a say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Kamala Harris lost because her campaign turned the racism dial to the sour spot. If she had been more progressive she’d have more votes from those who decided to sit this one out. If she went full overtly islamophobic rather than this unholy mixture of quietly abetting genocide, bipartisan respectability politics and identity politics, she would have gotten some more votes from the white supremacist crowd which overwhelmingly voted for Trump but instead just left EVERYONE comfused and alienated.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

If she went full overtly islamophobic rather than this unholy mixture of quietly abetting genocide, bipartisan respectability politics and identity politics, she would have gotten some more votes from the white supremacist crowd

That’s the thing…no she wouldn’t…she’s a black woman, the white supremacists would always choose Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I’m not even sure about that last part. The chuds know they are being pandered to. They can trust Trump to do the things he promises. They can’t trust Kamala even if she runs to the right of Trump. With Trump every failure can be blamed on the Deep State because he’s their guy. With Kamala every failure is expected, as she’s a liberal and obviously using the racism dial.

She didn’t have to be all that progressive either. She could have been as progressive as Biden 2020 and that might have gotten her 10 million extra votes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

watching the dnc and the moderate media hide this fact in plain sight by calling it “distancing” from biden is 🤌

permalink
report
reply

permalink
report
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.6K

    Posts

  • 134K

    Comments