384 points

Interesting.

When a billionaire is sentenced to prison, and then actually has to go to prison, it’s called a “legal loophole”.

permalink
report
reply
147 points

My first thought was “So we call ‘following the law’ a loophole now?”

If the law meant a fucking thing, he would have been in prison decades ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

WHY did it take this long to get around to it? So bizarre.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

In a word: Garland.

In two words: Merrick Garland

In three words: fucking Merrick Garland

In four words: fucking Merrick “Slowclown” Garland

In five words: establishment hack as attorney general.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

'The voters are going to reject him and then we don’t have to go through all this messy business if prosecution."

It’s the moral elevation of inaction for its own sake above action for any reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
222 points

Fun to think about, but I can promise that Trump will never see consequences for his actions. Everything just miraculously slides right off of him.

permalink
report
reply
80 points

Like a convcted felon president elect is going to give 2 shits about new york, or laws in general.

He’ll get a judge to pause all this shit until later. A good lawyer knows the law, a great lawyer knows the judge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

A great Russian Mafia knows the judge’s and prosecutor’s kids 🔪

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

And where the nearest window is when they refuse the tea

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Yeah, he’ll just get his 6/3 Supreme Court majority to rule that the president is also immune to state crimes like they already ruled for federal crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

LegalEagle on YouTube says it’s basically done. He will never see jail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Every time there’s talks about it I think about The fall of the house of Usher

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He’ll just stay out of New York until his coronation

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

First presidential act from prison: kill the judge. Second: free himself regardless of law.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Cheat codes

permalink
report
parent
reply
183 points

Yeah fucking right. Jesus Christ. We need to just accept that it’s over. He’s never going to face any consequences and NY is not sending anyone to the White House to drag him out…

permalink
report
reply
73 points
*

Realistically probably not. However it’s best to not give up hope and call out those who aren’t enforcing the law.
If there’s enough fuss it’ll go down in history as straight up corruption instead of some squabble of technicalities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

This is what the law is. It’s never applied to rich pale bros.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

What about orange pieces of shit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

…or rich pale chicks…or rich bros that aren’t pale…or rich chicks that aren’t pale…really the being rich is the important part. Let’s you buy good lawyers and also judges or legislators if you need to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

not with that attitude, get out on the streets already

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

But (as a European) it would be funny tho

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yea when hes dead, Redditors will go “We should resurrect trump to torture him”. 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

For the shit he’s done, they wouldn’t be wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply

So you’d resurrect hitler and risk him escaping taking control of the world again just for the chance of satisfying your urges to inflict harm? Hell nah, let dead pieces of shit stay dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
129 points

This country will never, ever prosecute a president because it would set a precedent of holding our politicians accountable. Ain’t happening. We’ve all been watching Pelosi do insider trading for decades.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

Except he’s already been prosecuted and found guilty. This is the sentencing. Now the question is will New York state sentence and imprison him before he takes office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

He’s just not going to show up and will stay in FL till after inauguration. If you think they’re going to hold politicians to the same standard as you and me you’re incredibly naïve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s gonna be interesting because we are clearly at a level of manipulation where the sheer act of being held accountable will 100% be called persecution. From here on out any attempt to hold a politician accountable will be met with resistance and end up being theatre.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

As reprehensible as it is morally, Congresscritters can STILL legally trade based on their insider info they get from their Congresscritter jobs. So there’s really no crime to prosecute. There SHIOULD be, but there isn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Politicians doing insider trading is not limited to Pelosi, and somehow not illegal. At least Congress has more ethics standards than courts, but it’s an extremely low bar and unreasonable to be held to such lower standard than the rest of us

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The “somehow” isn’t a big leap… The people who would have to outlaw it are the exact ones benefitting from the broken status quo, same as it ever was.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Insider trading is actually legal for congress though. You’re point is valid for systemic issues but this specific one boils down to the individuals involved. There is no precedent for this, no one can really say the judge did anything improper. It would likely be a boon for the governor in a blue state and who knows the DA ambitions.

I’m mostly making counterpoints than a prediction though. I still don’t think anything major will happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yes, the second most pressing concern in everyone’s lives after a second Trump term—Nancy Pelosi’s husband

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No one is saying that. It’s just blatant corruption in front of the entire country for everyone to see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Hey, you drew the comparison. The whole world of corrupt US politicians to choose from. Don’t like the conclusion people draw when they read exactly what you’ve written? Just write something else lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m concerned about Pelosi’s husband! Didn’t he get attacked by a dude with a hammer? I wouldn’t wish that on anyone

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Faaallllseee equivalennnnnceeee

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

The cope is strong here.

permalink
report
reply

Its stronger on reddit. Front page is filled with “Biden should resign and make Kamala the first woman president to ‘break the glass barrier’” and “Biden should appoint Kamala Harris to the supreme court” and “Biden shoud make an official act to do X”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

I mean. Rationally speaking, shouldn’t Biden do something extreme at this moment?

This is one core problem Kamala had. Her message was “Donald Trump is a Nazi,” yet the entire Biden administration never treated him like some existential threat to Democracy.

You know all those hypotheticals about killing Adolf Hitler? Notice how no one ever discusses the legality of killing Hitler? It’s all discussions of temporal mechanics or the ethics of punishing someone for a crime before they commit it. No one ever says, “no, you obviously shouldn’t kill Hitler before he comes to power, as that would have been against German law.”

Realistically, if Kamala’s rhetoric is factual, Biden should have had Trump arrested on day one of his term, charged in a military tribunal for treason, and convicted and sentenced before the first 100 days were complete. The debate should have been whether to give Trump the death penalty, not whether he had presidential immunity. And what about the Supreme Court? What ABOUT the Supreme Court? Did the Allies give much credence to whatever bullshit rulings the Nazi courts issued? Trump should have been pounded into the dirt, and any SCOTUS justices who dared to intervene should have been charged as accomplices. And anyone remotely involved in the plot should have been similarly purged from civil society. We should have seen hundreds, maybe even thousands, of life sentences.

THAT is how you respond to a threat to democracy. You find absolutely everyone involved and throw the book at them. You move quickly and run roughshod over normal judicial procedure. Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus and imprisoned people for running pro-Confederate newspapers. That is what you have to do in times where democracy is truly threatened.

Does Biden actually believe Trump is literally another Adolf Hitler? Then logically, if that is literally true, then Biden should order the military to take him out. Hell, he should do whatever is necessary, upend the entirety of American democracy, become a full dictator if need be. Better a centrist dictator than a Fascist one. In other words, if Trump is literally Hitler, than Biden should be acting right now like our hypothetical time traveler.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The debate should have been whether to give Trump the death penalty,

Bingo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Unfortunately Biden is a huge fucking pussy who brags about have cookouts with Nazi simps

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The problem, I believe, is that most Democrats are institutionalists who will defend the rule of law even when it means handing the reigns over to a group who have openly declared hostility towards it. They are also afraid that using any kind of force to stop Trump and his cronies will trigger violent rebellion and they know who owns most of the guns in this country. They’re playing a trolley problem game but because they don’t really have progressive values they aren’t putting, say, Ukraine, Palestine and the entire fucking climate on the “peaceful transfer of power” track.

We need a party with higher values than just “defending institutions.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
*

In response to a post highlighting examples of pointless, hyperbolic copium, this guy walks in and says, “hold my beer” and then advocates for Biden to (“logically”) launch a cruise missile at Mar-a-Lago. OMG I’m dying 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I mean, the resigning one is way more possible/probable and less disruptive. It’d more be funny than anything, especially if his fans bought lots if “47th” merch, as they’d be supporting Harris

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Imagine him resigning the day before Trump is sworn in so they’re totally not ready for it. Just to be extra dickish.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

My lizard brain is all for the resigning thing. With the message being something about making a statement in the history books about the decision the public made in 2024. Mostly predicting the inevitable disaster of Trumps second term, just like his first term.

Higher brain thinks that’s just poking a bear though. Ugh. We’re fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 136K

    Comments