9 points

Over 75 years, Hauer said lead exposure doubled the risk of schizophrenia for 89 million Americans, while quadrupling the risk of attention deficit disorder (ADHD) among another 170 million U.S. adults. The research also found a spike in anxiety, depression and neuroticism and a decrease in conscientiousness over the same period.

​The authors note that lead exposures would have also occurred from lead pipes, contaminated food and soil, and airborne dust from lead-emitting industries and waste incineration, among other sources. However, all of the mental health disorders tracked in the study rose and fell with the prevalence of lead in gasoline.

https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/highlights/leaded-gasoline-legacy-linked-to-surge-in-schizophrenia-adhd-and-anxiety-disorders-finds-study-9902282

permalink
report
reply
20 points

And they vote.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I guess this explains Boomers

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Gen X voted for Trump in greater numbers. We need to admit that half of Americans just fucking suck in general.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Half of Americans refused to vote for either genocidal maniac.

I’m more worried about the other half, both Red & Blue MAGA, who wouldn’t even draw the line at genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Nahh bro my team is good, trust me bro, just vote for my guy and it will fix your problems!

Rheee

Democracy dies in darkness 🤡

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Gen X was still knee deep in lead emissions.

Also, both groups have had a stranglehold on mainstream media, normalizing their sociopathy for the next generations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

For the record, less than a third of eligible voters voted for Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Fair enough, a third of Americans are fascists and a third are too beaten down or stupid to care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

There’s a lesson to be learned here:

Remove lead? Industry fights it. Lead gets removed. Industry is fine.

Acid rain? Industry fights it. Sulfur dioxide emissions reduced. Industry is fine.

Hole in ozone layer? Industry fights it. PFCs removed. Industry just fine.

Global warming? Industry fights it…

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

There is an issue of scale in that series. The first three are relatively small cost fixes. Addressing global climate change requires fundamentally reconfiguring all industry, globally at the very least. That’s orders of magnitude more costly than the first three fixes. And it’s orders of magnitude more difficult to get done politically, and engineering-wise.

But beyond that it may require massive reductions in consumption, trade and transportation. Possibly even short term remediation efforts like sprinkling silver dust in the stratosphere, which is estimated to cost in the hundred trillion dollar range.

I like that your comment shows that progress can be made against entrenched powerful interests though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nope all it requires is a tax on greenhouse gas emissions, that’s it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So no one has to change anything physically? Just tax and poof? Neat trick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

But the industry WASN’T fine. They lost a fraction of a fraction of a percent in profits by going for the cleaner, safer options. How can you be so heartless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Clearly nobody has thought about the corpo parasite mate…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

like how is that news? we see them all the time.

permalink
report
reply

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 9.7K

    Comments