-1 points

The one I told at Christmas last month.

Me: when are they going on tour?

Niece: who?

Me: The Hawks

Niece: I don’t know?

Me: you dont know about the Hawk Tua?

permalink
report
reply
1 point

What do you call a Rolls-Royce without wheels?

A Royce.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

What did the fish say when it hit the wall?

Dam

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Why do astronauts use Linux on the International Space Station? Because you can’t open windows in Space.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

When I was younger I memorized this in three (3) steps to use at zero (0) family gatherings… is it cheating if my stupidest joke is the only one I can recall instantly? :]

Warning: this joke is so ancient, it’s sepia-toned.


An engineer and a doctor were arguing about who had the harder job. To prove his might, the engineer decided to open a clinic, betting he’d be a successful doctor:

“If we can cure you, you pay $500; if we can’t, we pay you $1,000.”

Of course the doctor saw the proverbial <easy money> button immediately. The guy didn’t even have a license! So the doc went straight to the clinic as his first patient.

Doc: “Sir, I have lost my sense of taste.”

Engineer: “Nurse, please bring the medicine from box 22 and put 3 drops in the patient’s mouth.”

Doc: “Blawrgh! This is gasoline!”

Engineer: “Congratulations! You’ve got your taste back. That will be $500.”

The doctor leaves, fuming. But not to be beaten, he goes back after a few days – he can still leave with a profit if he plays this right.

Doc: “Sir, I have lost my memory.”

Engineer: “Nurse, please bring the medicine from box 22 and put 3 drops in the patient’s mouth.”

Doc: “What, no! That’s gasoline!”

Engineer: “Congratulations! You’ve got your memory back. That will be $500.”

The doctor leaves pissed. Buuut, doc comes back after a few days — he needs to at least break even, right? So, more determined than before, he brings a cane and says:

Doc: “Sir, I’ve gone blind.”

Engineer: disappointed “Well, unfortunately I don’t have any medicine for that. Take this $1,000.”

Doc: “But this is $500…”

Engineer: “Congratulations! You’ve got your vision back! That will be $500.”

permalink
report
reply

Casual Conversation

!casualconversation@lemm.ee

Create post

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Community stats

  • 3.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 678

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments