44 points

Incel Pedos telling on themselves. They can’t seem to help but say they are some of the worst pieces of shit.

Quality post OP.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

I thought we all agreed up until 29 years 364 days it’s babe and after that it’s milf

permalink
report
reply

This implies the existence of the rare 29-year-old leap milf

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Imagine the rule 34 on that one. You better bet fans are going to want proof


permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Leap milf” is just an alternative definition for a cougar

permalink
report
parent
reply

Wasn’t there a scandal in Germany that 45% of MILF pornstars don’t actually have any children?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
5 points
permalink
report
parent
reply

Oh nein, I ate die Zwiebel!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Woman needs to be old enough for her kids’ friends to think she’s hot to be a milf.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So, for some women, that might be as early as 25

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do I hear a banjo?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I figured it was that she just needs to have kids. As long as she’s a mom and somebody wants to fuck her, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You don’t need a special categorization for a hot twenty something. Her having procreated or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If one is over 30 and doesn’t have children are they still a milf by default?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

still milf, M for Mature

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, they have chosen the Cougar skill path.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

the arguably cooler sounding “Spinster”

You spin me right round, baby, right round


permalink
report
reply
4 points

Don’t forget the queen spinster, Spindarella!

permalink
report
parent
reply

Coreofmidas does deliver some gold once in a while.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Like a record baby

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Wasn’t spinster some old school slang in like the 1920s or something about women who didn’t settle down right away? Or am I hallucinating

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yes, and well before that too. It meant an unmarried adult woman over the age of _____. (Here is where the discrepancy lies.) It was always true for an elderly woman. But could sometimes be applied all the way down to age 30, especially if you go far enough back that you were expected to be married in your 20s. (And if you weren’t, there must be something wrong with you.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Well I’m unmarried, female and in my mid thirties and there’s definitely something wrong with me. I now identify as a spinster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My great grandmother’s wedding certificate lists her as a spinster, at the ripe old age of 19. This was a little over 100 years ago, in 1914

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s quite a bit older than that. 1800s, I believe? A “spinster” was a women who got a job spinning/weaving fabric, which was one of the few jobs women were allowed at the time, and they were paid for it! Very well, iirc.

So a woman earning her own income and able to support herself, not being required to marry in order to live comfortably.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

People misspelling ‘woman’ annoys the hell out of me. It’s literally ‘man’ prefixed by ‘wo’. I don’t know what bizarre process could lead to using ‘women’ instead. And it’s nearly always these Andrew-Tate-loving pound shop alphas.

permalink
report
reply

That and “should of” should be punishable by getting your hand cut off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Their not the only ones who should be punished!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’d rather stub my toe then see such simple mistakes

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Read: “head cut off” and agreed. Sry for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And it’s nearly always these Andrew-Tate-loving pound shop alphas.

Nah, it’s not that deep–tons of men and women make this particular mistake (writing “women” when intending to use the singular “woman”) for some bizarre reason. I’ve observed this phenomenon for well over a decade. Notably, I’ve never really seen someone write “woman” when they mean “women”, only the other direction. And never with man/men at all. Very odd, specific error.

Maybe it’s a “should of”-type mistake, I can only guess. But what I know for sure is that it’s a very common mistake, and almost certainly unintentional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I recall a particular time period in early-ish smartphone history when the stupid thing tried to correct every instance of woman in my emails to “roman” for some weird reason so that one might just be auto-correct gone stupid again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The difference is that one is singular and one is plural. “Theres a group of women” and “Theres a singlular woman”

People do often get the usage wrong but its not being misspelled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I feel like this image has more to be upset about than misnumbering the word woman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

FBI needs to pay attention to that man’s search history


permalink
report
reply
11 points

Thinking the exact same thing. Wouldn’t be surprised if he already isn’t allowed within 50 miles of a school.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.

Community stats

  • 7.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 991

    Posts

  • 44K

    Comments