183 points

I want shorter games with worse graphics made by people who are paid more to work less and I’m not kidding.

This thing is a scam, and you’re all being taken for chumps. The only worse fraud than SC is buying Fatalities on Mortal Kombat.

permalink
report
reply
63 points

There is this tiny company called Nihon Falcom. They make this game series called Trails that I adore. they have like three programmers work on each entry.

In the time since Star Citizen was announced they have released:

  • The Legend of Nayuta: Boundless Trails 2012
  • Ys: Memories of Celceta 2012
  • The Legend of Heroes: Trails of Cold Steel 2013
  • The Legend of Heroes: Trails of Cold Steel II 2014
  • Tokyo Xanadu 2015
  • Ys VIII: Lacrimosa of Dana 2016
  • The Legend of Heroes: Trails of Cold Steel III
  • The Legend of Heroes: Trails of Cold Steel IV
  • Ys IX: Monstrum Nox 2019
  • The Legend of Heroes: Trails into Reverie
  • The Legend of Heroes: Trails Through Daybreak
  • The Legend of Heroes: Trails Through Daybreak II
  • Ys X: Nordics

as well as a bunch of ports of older games to modern platforms and localizing them to the west. All of these are worth playing and some of these were GOTY material for me.

Its good to quantify how much time has passed, and how much you can get done with a smaller budget and focused scope.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Trails into Reverie is not worth playing. Cold Steel was iffy. Trails is a shadow of its former self.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Call me shallow but I enjoy the fanservice ( not the naughty type, I mean when characters from the previous entries come back/get mentioned) so I enjoyed them thoroughly, Kuro 1 and 2 are also great, they bring a lot of new ideas to the table.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Do you play indie games? They seem to be exactly what you’re describing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I play mostly smaller games, and am very patient with my gaming habits. Haven’t bought a AAA game in a very long while. Still follow these kind of news because they trend set the whole industry and encroach everywhere with bad practice as big publishers represent the majority of the industry releases and also the grossest revenue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

that’s a fucking thing?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

It’s now a season bundle. But it was $10 per fatality x 3. One for Halloween, one for Thanksgiving, and one for Christmas. That was a total of $30 for a whole minute of cut-scenes. They successfully Overton it, apologized and now it’s $10 for the three scenes. But yeah, now buying Fatalities is a thing, look forward for your Easter Fatality edition and an extra Bunny skin version for only $4.99.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

People will buy fucking anything, it’s hopeless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m all for having both. I personally prefer ‘AAA’ games over indie games but I think there’s just different flavours for different folks.

That said, SC is a mega scam at this point and I can’t believe people are still continuing to fund it to this level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, Underrail is pretty good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

imagine a bigger game with great graphics and a whole ton of technical innovation, AND have people be paid well, that is for chumps

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

This project is baffling

permalink
report
reply
46 points

don’t judge until you’ve seen the dynamic cloth physics! that is what everyone wants, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I actually will only play a game with realistic sweat and tears. Oh, they are hard at work on that?! Well FINALLY, I’m SO fucking glad. Thank you SO much, Robert’s Space Industries. You guys are definitely NOT complete hacks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

WHERE’S THE HORSE BALL PHYSICS ON MY SPACESHIP

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I paid for star citizen a decade ago and honestly enjoyed it enough for about 2 days. It always felt exciting to see how ahead they were of early Xbox 1 / PS4 games in their scope with volumetric effects etc.

The trouble is, 90% of their innovative content has been long overtook by general game progression, they’re making a game that could have probably launched with the PS5 and been innovative and are already falling behind there. I genuinely believe that they were Innovating their game slowly over time and there were amazing things in the works, but they missed the moment that it was exciting and new by so many years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

I’ve been part of some amateur game dev projects and SC has the vibe of an amateur project where the devs are constantly focusing on whatever catches their fancy at the moment, going back and tinkering with things they’ve already made, and sort of aimlessly scope creeping. There’s nobody to strongarm them into writing, much less following a game design document.

All of that is intuitive to me to understand.

Then there is “the dream” that is being sold to people who want this type of game. That level of very specific fandom is also easy to understand, at least from a distance. People get super into all kinds of games and spend outsized amounts of money and time.

Star Citizen is like the perfect storm of these elements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If you don’t know what you want except a nebulous dream, you can’t tell that you’re dissatisfied with what you actually have, and don’t realize that what you’re doing isn’t actually getting you anything. This applies to both the devs and the fans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Think part of it is that Chris Robert’s comes from a time when games couldn’t be patched.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No, there’s really no excusing this game’s development. If anything, Robert’s should have learned from Freelancer to have a tight core product that’s actually shippable.

At this point Internet nerds are locked into throwing money at Star Citizen’s development, making it the closest thing humanity has achieved to a perpetual motion machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I have a friend who is obsessed with it. I asked him if it was a money laundering scheme. He agreed its the most likely situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

I literally cannot think of a worse way to launder money then an extremely high profile public crowdfunding campaign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Laundering? They’re not even entering as investors are they, so they are not really expecting any return other that a presumably finished game at some point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

That and they release their financial reports every year…

The people in this thread are astoundingly hateful idiots that are just doing the groupthink thing to be part of a group that lets them feel “smarter than you.” It’s really disappointing to see this every time star citizen is mentioned, but I’ll just continue to enjoy it and then welcome all these people when it’s completed as they suddenly stop hating on it because it isn’t fashionable anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I’m convinced they made the game as a side project to their true goal of inventing dynamic server meshing.

We are talking about Chris “feature creep” Roberts here, though. The guy can’t stop himself from retasking a team with yet another “immersive” thing they need to waste their time on.

So who knows. Could just be bad management, but I wouldn’t put it past them to be doing this so they can license and sell the engine or something. That is, until other developers snipe their employees and use their knowledge to develop server meshing themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

A few of my guildmates play SC as well and they try to get other people to play, but every time an open period happens, the servers always shit the bed with instability and the play experience for the new player is awful.

It’s so funny trying to hear them rationalize bad servers and inability to do basic things as just part of the experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

to be fair, its issue is that they literally have a whole flood of people trying the game, like 70%+ is people just trying the game then

permalink
report
parent
reply
90 points

After a decade and an astronomical amount of money spent, this thing is still in pre-alpha. People have left school, got married, have kids, played and forgotten No Man’s Sky, Elite Dangerous, and now Starfield, and there is still no Star Citizen.

It’s time to accept that Star Citizen will NEVER be released, because what Chris Roberts is selling is “dream as a service” which can be anything you want it to be, and one that never has to end for as long as the “game” is still in development.

The moment an actual product is released is the moment the flow of money will stop.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

I once saw a comment on a SC update video from a guy who claimed to have backed up SC as a teenager, went to college, entered the industry, was part of a team from start to shipping a video game. twice, and still SC is in pre-alpha. He said that now as a veteran of the industry he realizes that SC is a scam. Like, 99% of the stuff they hyped as their envelope breaking new tech for video games, has already been done by dozens of games at a fraction of the cost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yeah, server meshing at the scale they did it has been possible for years. The issue is overlapping it at the planetary and multi system scale for hundreds of thousands of people and all of their inventory objects simultaneously.

They essentially just handed these objects to a master server that has to monitor all of them, instead of having each client server doing it individually. It’s like a backup technology that can respawn all tracked items in the event of a server failure. They’ve basically just added redundancy. I don’t foresee performance being improved when this overlord monitoring server inevitably gets taxed to capacity tracking everyone’s shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Do you happen to have a link? I’d be interested in reading more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Dude, it was a random comment on a YT video about 8 months ago. I have zero chance of finding it again. It’s just an anecdote. So, as much as I hate to say it, just…trust me bro.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

That’s not entirely true, if they ever went full release there’s still a fuck ton they can charge players for and milk. It’s just their Kickstarter that won’t make money anymore.

That being said you’re correct, they’ve essentially pioneered the concept of “Game Development as a Service” in the same way live service and early access games are doing now regularly.

Personally even if SQ42 launches I don’t think they’ll get the persistent universe up to their original vision for another ten years. They absolutely aren’t going to hit their 100 solar system metric from the 2011/12 era. I’d be surprised if there ends up being more than ten at launch, but it would surprise me even more if the game ever has an official launch at all.

What’s most likely is that this game will remain in early access Alpha forever, allowing it to shield itself from criticism while taking it’s sweet time constructing the game they said would release back in 2016 originally. That will allow them to justify keeping the Kickstarter open forever while also spending most of their time creating and selling new ships in a game that doesn’t even have gameplay loops for most of them. Then they’ll occasionally drop a new star system or loop to keep the hopes of players up.

This new dynamic server meshing technology they just showcased (at the tech demo level of complexity) is their only hope for making the game playable. The performance of the game isn’t due to stress on your rig as much as networking latency because their servers are overloaded. If they can scale it to the planetary, and eventually multi system level, then they might have something worth picking up. I’m not going to pay for it until that game exists, though. Which it probably never will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“Pre-alpha” would be if they hadn’t started coding. It’s alpha. There’s something you can play, it’s just buggy and incomplete and thus not beta. Alpha for this long has enough stigma, you don’t need to exaggerate like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

You know you can literally play the game right now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

You can play an alpha build of an unfinished game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Pre-alpha build. After more than a decade.

If Star Citizen is a person it would be starting junior high/middle school now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

The state of Star Citizen is right now is on par with a lot of games on “release.” This is as much an insult to the gaming industry in general as it is a compliment to Star Citizen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Technically true, you can play the current build of a game that’s been in perpetual development with distractive milestones continually added so as to distract you from the promises made in years past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

It’s so frustrating to see people in this thread posting objectively false statements about SC. Yes, it’s behind schedule and yes it suffers from scope creep. But it’s not a scam and it’s not vaporware. People who give them money know exactly what they are getting into. You can buy a ship now and fly it immediately. You can spend hundreds of hours in the game in it’s current state. Even pointing out that it’s playable gets downvotes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

Wait, people are still dumping money into this?

permalink
report
reply
45 points

It’ll release ANY DAY NOW. -The idiots that keep giving RSI money

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

It released years and years ago. You realize that, right? That it’s playable… and people like it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

No it entered into alpha about 10 years ago. Not even beta, it’s alpha, there is barely any gameplay to it.

I’ve seen grey box proof of concept pieces with more functionality

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No it didn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Uh oh looks like you are not following the hive mind of the sub! It’s sad but funny how little people know about SC but still insist they know its a scam when all they know is what they read from hit piece articles. I can’t wait for sc 4.0 server meshing is such a game changer

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points
*

how dare you come to our echo chamber with your “facts”, we need to repeat the clickbait headlines and nothing else!

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I think it has turned into a sunk cost fallacy for so many now. They put so much money into it they can’t afford for it to fail/not continue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Why is it so hard for people to imagine that there are players who like the game as it is and see value in buying ships? After 10 years of development, people have a pretty good idea of what they are getting into.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If people were smart and had good ideas of what they were getting into, no scams would exist, ever.

lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sure, and people spend tons of money and time on gacha mobile games. Doesn’t mean that they haven’t been scammed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

But you could play it again in a new ship

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

As a day 1 backer i would like to offer my sincerest apologies.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Get ‘em, boys.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

IMMA SHAVE HIS DOG

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I gave them my 45$ at the beginning and said call me when it’s done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you have any nachos I can murder? Or at least beat up a little?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

Community stats

  • 8.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.4K

    Posts

  • 92K

    Comments