210 points
*

So I think the general idea is that you can convert more CO² to carbon in the form of sugars and O² molecules per square foot with algae than with trees. Trees would totally do the same thing if we ripped up all the concrete and buildings to replant a forest, but that process would take decades.

This can be added into existing infrastructure and helps I guess. Kinda a neat concept.

permalink
report
reply
100 points

Also tree roots will tear stuff up

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

That adds character.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

And lawsuits when people trip over uneven concrete caused by roots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Sometimes wheelchair user here. Character can kiss my ass <3

(I’m not expressing anger at you, just at my city’s mangled sidewalks)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ain’t nobody got time for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

If they have surface roots, plant tap root trees instead

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That just means you can catch some sick air

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Shade, cooler Air in summer, better protection against rain… 🤷‍♂️ Trees are 😎

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Exactly man… fewer floods, more biodiversity, they look nice which is better for mental health and reducing hypertension (the number one risk factor correlated with deaths), some of them give you fruits or nuts to eat… Trees are awesome.

I think any city should strive to have at least as many trees as the number of people living in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Trees 2.0 huh? I’m going to go post about this in r/trees

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I give it a day before someone tries to smoke dried out algae.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Except that trees look good and give shade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

a translucent roof filled with algae would be pretty cool

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

…if we ripped up all the concrete and buildings to replant a forest…

You say this like it’s a downside, we’d better get started!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Hey, I’d be the first wanker with a sledge out breaking it up if we all went in on it together. Something tells me I wouldn’t get very far tho

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It would be. Cities and urban areas aren’t the problem. Suburbs, with 20+ Minute commutes, on hot swollen rivers of concrete and asphalt flowing from them, with every individual in their own metal/polymer box burning hydrocarbons is the bigger problem. Cities might be a solution.

Conversely these algae tanks can go lots of places a tree wouldn’t be practical. They’ll never need to be trimmed out of power lines etc. Or tear up sidewalks, streets or foundations. That’s not to say we shouldn’t have trees. Just more green overall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Pedantic, but for carbon dioxide or oxygen (or most other molecules you’ll write out) it’s a subscript for the number. Wikipedia

~So it would be CO~2~ or H~2~O or O~2~~

Seems my markdown is rusty, however you make subscripts I guess for CO<sub>2</sub>

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

But why not just like… Do that somewhere where the mass actually makes a difference? You’d be better off dumping acres full of this shit instead of regrowing a forest. Doing it in individual tanks, sparsely within a city, is both an inefficient use of resources and fucking ugly.

Trees only purpose in a city is not to clean out CO2. It’s not even their primary purpose in a city. If it was, they’d be selecting specific species etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I mean ideally we would flood the ocean with Fe³ and spark a mass breed of this shit where it belongs. The biomass could work it’s way up the food chain as an added benefit too.

But we won’t 🙃

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If history taught us anything it is that purposely messing with an ecosystem seldom has the effect we want to achieve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Alright I’m just going off of what I learned in environmental science class this summer, not an expert here. There was something about algae blooms (usually caused by fertilizer runoff) being a really bad thing for local ecosystems. I’m not sure if this is relevant to what you’re saying, just throwing it out there lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I have this fantasy where we humanity has a whole biotechnology skill tree that we never unlocked but there’s like a Renaissance waiting to happen that will one day uncover all these cool new branch’s

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If they didn’t just breath oxygen and give off CO² at night, maybe, but trees actually undo much of their oxygen creation overnight… 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Much, not all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yep, as opposed to algea’s none.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

But they provide little shade 😒

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Jump in and you won’t need shade to cool down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Like being slimed on Nickolodeon

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

On this note, think of all the benefits if we filled all our public swimming pools with algae!! I’m sure nobody would notice the difference

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

also algae farms can be arbitrarily vertical and can be built underground if you supply them with CO2 - trees are mostly limited to the surface.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I saw something like this, which piped exhaust from a generator thru a container of water and algae, with the idea to capture the co2, etc produced. Sure why not. I’ll still prefer trees.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I’ll still prefer trees

God, yes. Trees provide shade, transpirative cooling, homes for animals (birds, mammals, insects), and a particular natural beauty that tanks of algae do not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Trees are too useful so we keep cutting them down

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Nobody uses an urban tree that gets cut down. It just gets hauled off to the landfill.

It’s absolutely ludicrous that when the gigantic oak in my yard fell the arborist didn’t know of anybody who could cut it up into lumber for me – even in a city with so many urban trees that it’s called the “city in a forest” – but allegedly the economics of it don’t work out, or something. I dunno if that’s true, but it pisses me off enough that I’m half-tempted to go buy a damn portable sawmill and start a business doing it myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Say that to the table in my living room. (They removed a lot of old exotic trees that were lining some road some years back, those trees got sold to people making nice tables).

Selling the trees was only a side effect, and these weren’t your run of the mill trees either. But exceptions exist

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This doesn’t have a root system to worry about so it needs less underground space. Don’t get me wrong I love me a good tree, but in places where there isn’t enough land for roots to spread this could be useful. Lots of side walk trees die due to not enough space for the roots

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Trees have trouble in urban areas with a lot of traffic

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Traffic has trouble in urban areas with a lot of trees

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 259K

    Comments