“Barbie” has answered the billion-dollar question with a resounding “yes.” Barely three weeks into its run, writer-director Greta Gerwig’s blockbuster has raked in an astounding $1.03 billion at the global box office, according to official Warner Bros. estimates. This makes Gerwig the first solo female director with a billion-dollar movie.

95 points

In is a fun movie with an actual fresh plot. Who knew Hollywood could still make those?!

permalink
report
reply
46 points

It’s based off existing IP, though, so not as fresh as we would like. This is more likely to lead the studio execs to think they can mine kids toys for content, rather than think writing is important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Apparently Polly Pocket and Uno are going to have their own movies as well. I am not totally sold on Polly, but I am all in for Uno. I hope they put in a draw 25 or really showcase the extreme desperation associated with not finding your card. But yeah, new compelling content please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Lol I mean this in a friendly way. You’re either too sober or too wasted for my stoned ass. I see it opposite, and love both. I’m a simp for all sorts of card games; uno and all their “expansions” turn me on

But I can see how they can actually movitize Polly pocket (eg like green army men in toy story) There’s a whole Pocket world! I love miniaturized things and Polly pocket was the fucking shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Make it like Casino Royale but replace poker with uno.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The Uno movie is gonna be a sequel to Battleship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Uno could be done as a Running Man remake lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Which is hilarious because after the long and expensive process of producing them (likely during the strike so the writing and acting will suck), the companies get a delayed box office bomb on their hands when they try to hype up their Hot Wheels “it’s fast and furious for 9 year old boys” movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Fast & Furious is already for 9 year old boys smh

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It probably made over many objections from the old fuddy duddies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
5 points

😂 I immediately thought of this video but more specifically the black guy reacting to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Damn, if you check out some Right Wing videos on YouTube they’ll tell you all about how the movie failed financially and how it was a massive flop.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

I put off watching the critical drinkers video on it until I went to go see it myself. Actually enjoyed the movie quite a bit, was able to understand the hyper feminist tones were obviously very intentionally ironic. Then you go watch this guy’s review and its all lost on him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Critical Drinker sucks.

Pitch Meeting is where it’s at.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Nah, his video about The Witcher on Netflix was 100% accurate. The showrunners are comically inept and despise the source material.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I thought he was funny when I first saw a couple of his videos like a year or two ago. Probably because the videos were about really bad movies.

And then I realized if a movie had a female main character in it (gasp!) most of the “review” was going to be him shitting on her using whatever big words he looked up. Doesn’t matter if the movie itself was good or bad. Women bad!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I love the old ass show Sledgehammer for the main character being a chauvinist and condescending ass to women but it’s very satirical and making fun of that whole attitude. And that was in the 80s

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well, that works for their audience because, spoiler, the “did my own research” crowd never goes beyond the blowhard source

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Who is saying this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Bench Appear-o, Kanadian Ketamine Kermit, Nick Fuentes, the usual…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

can you link them saying this?

i am certain you’re making this up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Go woke, become billionaire?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Go fash, lose cash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Zinger!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It was woke? Barbie put down a alave revolt and it was presented as a good thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Can you define woke?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

They’re making fun of the Republican phrase “go woke, go broke”, not calling the movie “woke”

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I’m honestly not surprised. It’s one of those rare movies that has mass appeal (which guarantees it at least half a billion) and also a surprisingly good story that had critics and audiences raving about it.

I was only forced to watch it because I didn’t want to wait in the mall that long for Oppenheimer to start while the wife finishes Barbie. I haven’t been more satisfied and entertained by a blind watch since… Burning.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

They may have made a barbillion, but they’ll never make a morbillion, which one is really the achievement? Checkmate libs.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 467K

    Comments