“Barbie” has answered the billion-dollar question with a resounding “yes.” Barely three weeks into its run, writer-director Greta Gerwig’s blockbuster has raked in an astounding $1.03 billion at the global box office, according to official Warner Bros. estimates. This makes Gerwig the first solo female director with a billion-dollar movie.

-24 points

Thanks people. You were so concerned with if you could and didn’t stop to think if you should.

Coming next summer! Barbie 2: Tokyo drift

permalink
report
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

It would actually be “2 Barb 2 Barbierious”

And then “Barbie: Tokyo Drift”

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Go woke, become billionaire?

permalink
report
reply
-4 points
*

Can you define woke?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

They’re making fun of the Republican phrase “go woke, go broke”, not calling the movie “woke”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It was woke? Barbie put down a alave revolt and it was presented as a good thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Go fash, lose cash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Zinger!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Needs inflation adjustment to be a realistic statistic.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Inflation adjusted relative to what exactly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

‘Sexism’

Anytime a woman does something monetarily big in Hollywood people being up inflation. They also do with most records, but always with women.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Oh, believe me I know. That’s why I asked them to be specific about what they meant here.

The secret ingredient is always 🌈✨ misogyny ✨🌈

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Nah, people bring it up every time any of the highest grossing movies are discussed, like Avatar and Avengers Endgame.

Beating Gone with the wind is very hard. Avatar is surprisingly close, but not close enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s too broad a claim for me to agree.

In this specific event, adjusting for inflation on older movies might show that there was precedent where a movie directed by a single woman was more successful than this one.

If that happen, that achievement should also be celebrated. If that didn’t happen, this movie should be even more celebrated.

Asking for more data isn’t the same thing as attacking a claim.

Maybe I’m just naive, but I like to assume good intentions.

If someone actually say something sexist, calling them out is important. But I don’t think assuming sexism first is a good thing either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
0 points

That does not answer the question, relative to WHAT exactly? Precisely?

Relative to last year? When Avatar 2 and Maverick pulled in over a billy? Relative to 2018 when Black Panther did? Relative to 2008 when The Dark Knight did?

Exactly which one of these achievements is suggested to be the benchmark by which to desperately downplay the current achievement?

Inflation adjusted for SOME time period, shouldn’t ALL these movies receive some discount and skepticism? It’s funny how you only hear about how inflation is a big deal when it’s a movie made by a woman for a primarily female audience. It’s almost like there’s some other motivation in this “just asking questions” 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Here’s a list of the top 30 adjusted for inflation: https://www.gamesradar.com/highest-grossing-movies-inflation/

With that information, I don’t believe Barbie is in the 50 if you adjust for inflation.

Unadjusted isn’t entirely useless. It’s interesting to see how a movie compares to more recent ones and it also filters out movies that were released in a time where TVs, home media or streaming didn’t exist or were not as common.

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points

In is a fun movie with an actual fresh plot. Who knew Hollywood could still make those?!

permalink
report
reply
46 points

It’s based off existing IP, though, so not as fresh as we would like. This is more likely to lead the studio execs to think they can mine kids toys for content, rather than think writing is important.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Which is hilarious because after the long and expensive process of producing them (likely during the strike so the writing and acting will suck), the companies get a delayed box office bomb on their hands when they try to hype up their Hot Wheels “it’s fast and furious for 9 year old boys” movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Fast & Furious is already for 9 year old boys smh

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Apparently Polly Pocket and Uno are going to have their own movies as well. I am not totally sold on Polly, but I am all in for Uno. I hope they put in a draw 25 or really showcase the extreme desperation associated with not finding your card. But yeah, new compelling content please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Uno could be done as a Running Man remake lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Lol I mean this in a friendly way. You’re either too sober or too wasted for my stoned ass. I see it opposite, and love both. I’m a simp for all sorts of card games; uno and all their “expansions” turn me on

But I can see how they can actually movitize Polly pocket (eg like green army men in toy story) There’s a whole Pocket world! I love miniaturized things and Polly pocket was the fucking shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The Uno movie is gonna be a sequel to Battleship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Make it like Casino Royale but replace poker with uno.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It probably made over many objections from the old fuddy duddies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
5 points

😂 I immediately thought of this video but more specifically the black guy reacting to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Great movie with lots of substance

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 467K

    Comments