In theaters December 15th 2023

41 points

Another entry in “films no one, absolutely no one, asked for”. Warner Bros just keeps tripping over itself. And up against the Chicken Run sequel for the same weekend.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

* Ears perk up *

A Chicken Run sequel, you say? Well, I know what I’m doing this December!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

THE CHICKENS ARE ORGANIZING MRS. TWEEDY

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Chicken Run is a Netflix film though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Streaming releases are still competition. Pay out the wazoo on tickets/drinks/snacks to go to the theater VS a home premier as part of an ongoing subscription, bits from your own pantry, and readily paused for bathroom breaks or otherwise. Loads of people avoid the theater since the movie will show up on X service in a few weeks. Wild times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Am I right in remembering this Wonka is with Timothy Chalemet?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re absolutely correct. This version of Wonka is played by Timothy Chalemet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

For real, who seriously had the thought “you know what, we need another adaptation of that one book from decades ago. We could try adapting some of that guy’s other work, but why bother? I know we tried the goofy, fun spin and the dark, gritty spin, but I’m sure we missed an angle on that one kid’s book.”

More importantly how did the guy who had that thought not get kicked out of the pitch meeting immediately?

permalink
report
reply
19 points

I don’t disagree but

We could try adapting some of that guy’s other work, but why bother?

In recent memory Matilda, The Witches , and The BFG have all had unnecessary reboots. I’ll bet a James and the Giant Peach is next.

If anything, it’s time to leave his material alone now. there are enough new children’s books and stories written all the time, surely they deserve a shot?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

not get kicked out of the pitch meeting immediately?

Rehashing old successful movies is tight.

Wow wow wow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

So you’ve got a new movie for me?

Yes sir, I do. But I thought this time we’d do an old movie instead of a new movie because old movies usually make more money.

Oh, remaking old movies for money is tight. It’s also literally the only thing we do here.

That’s right. So I think we should really go back this time and pull out something the audience wants to see. Something with tons of nostalgia for adults, but also something the younger audience will care a lot about.

I don’t think we have the money to remake Star Wars again so soon.

Nah, I thought we’d just do another Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.

What?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This reads like something screenrant pitch meeting would do, I can even hear that dude’s voice!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Wait, what book is this an adaptation of? This isn’t from either Charlie and the Chocolate Factory or The Great Glass Elevator as far as I’m aware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is there a Charlie Cinematic Universe now? lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can’t wait for phase 3

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Jesus can we ever get anything new? Charlie and the Chocolate Factory already got a fucking reboot two decades ago. We don’t need a third one

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I’m hoping for a Charlie and the Chocolate Factory movie universe, purely for the inevitable, gritty spin-off, OOMPA

“Call me Oompa Loompa one more time, motherfucker, I DARE YOU…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I think if they were to make a Oompa-Loompa spinoff it’d end up being like the Minions, yet even more annoying somehow

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No it would probably get dark like everything legally has to be now

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This is a prequel so it’s a new side of the story. My bigger problem with this is that it just looks really bad. The performance falls really flat and feels desperate to invoke whimsy, but it’s failing badly at it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Good lord has it been that long?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Almost. It was 2005. And it was a good movie too, imo. Doesn’t need fixing like the original did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Woah Woah Woah. The original was a masterpiece. When you skip the cheer up charlie song.

I found charlie and the chocolate factory OK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/otNh9bTjXWg

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Uh. Timothee looks…kinda terrible in this?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

What got me was the accent he is using. It seems to keep switching all depending on the dialogue he is giving, which I found kind of distracting but maybe it’ll be better in the actual film? Who knows, I do think he is a talented actor and I really loved the first two Paddington movies so maybe this will turn out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Agreed re: accent.

I think he’s talented too, but limited. He’s got a bit of dead eyes here and I’m not hopeful for his performance.

Paul King is the reason why I’m even remotely curious about this movie!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Gene wilder was a bit dead eyed as Wonka.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think Moseby was in the trailer so I’m interested in that in all honesty

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It feels like he’s desperately trying to be whimsical but is awkward and unnatural at it so his performance feels super fake. If you’re going to make a Wonka movie then Wonka’s performance matters more than anything else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

YES! The “look at how eccentric and whimsical I am!” mannerism is rubbing me off the wrong way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For the studio it’s good enough for young folks who have never experienced anything of quality or substance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I normally love him, but this seems like really weird casting. The whole thing just seems off in general. I can’t really put my finger on it…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Same thought, reaaaaally bad casting here. Not the right energy at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Movies and TV Shows

!moviesandtv@lemmy.film

Create post

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators