The investigation is tied to an incident on an Alaska Airlines flight in early January. Boeing also told a Senate panel that it cannot find a record of the work done on the Alaska plane.

12 points
1 point
3 points

The internet archive has worked reliably for me, but I am definitely checking this out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Diversify your options! That way if one disappears, you’ll have other options. Diversifying options also helps keep other options functioning, because they’ll still have userbases instead of the userbase shrinking.

I try to use every option available, especially because while Pypass Paywalls Clean has been super useful for me, it only works about 95% of the time. The rest of the time, I have to turn to another option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

this is just a brute force blocker with a huge list of domains. you’re better off just using ublock origin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

https://1ft.io/<url> also works a fair amount of the time (even more useful when used as a bookmarklet)

permalink
report
parent
reply
149 points

If it’s anything like other criminal inquiries in this country, they will find the lowest paid chump on the totem pole to pin all the blame on while the C-Suite once again walks away with Golden god damned Parachutes.

permalink
report
reply
62 points

It’s optimistic to assume they’ll even bother finding someone in the company guilty even if it’s some low level chump. I don’t actually expect anyone to be found guilty in this whole thing. The only time corporations in this country actually suffer repercussions for their actions is when they cost shareholders significant money Enron style.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This is absolutely right. The worst case scenario in these situations is a settlement with no admission of fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I think even this isn’t as hurtful to major shareholders - the ones that have decisionmaking power - as you’d hope. They typically have more information and pay more attention than the small fish. They’d offload their shares earlier, for longer, as to not disturb the price too much, leaving the remainder to hold the bag once shit hits the fan. The stock market enables that. They’ve extracted a shit ton of money by steering the company over the last couple of decades. The ones that would really bear the brunt are the shareholders that never had any decisionmaking power, and the company’s workers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Oh I’m sure their Legal team will get QA people to do a full audit trail to find out who was on shift at the assembly line and blame them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Or when they’re foreign companies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Just this country? Remember the diesel scandal at VW?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Couple of rogue engineers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“Couple of rogue engineers.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Oliver Schmidt was a senior executive at VW who was prosecuted for that. Yes, upper management did take a hit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Was he an executive, or just a manager, or just an engineer? Articles (including those on the justice department website) aren’t clear about exactly what his role was. None of the actual executives holed up on DE have appeared to pay the price.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*

Sadly nothing Boeing has done is criminal in the US even though it absolutely should be. It’s just the bog standard corporate pursuit of profit at the expense of all else. Cutting corners, ignoring safety, rushing everything, and all with fewer people to do the work than are necessary. If Boeing is found criminally guilty for that half the corporations in the US are in trouble.

No, this is just political theater, much like the TSA is. Boeing has fucked up enough that people are starting to take notice, so this is just a little reminder to them that they need to stop fucking up quite so publicly. The executives will sweat a little, temporarily improve things, and then go right back to their usual bullshit in a year or two when things calm down. Worst case scenario they’ll put out a series of BP style “We’re sorry” videos where they emphasize how much quality and safety supposedly mean to them.

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*

much like the TSA is

While mostly true, the TSA was also a stealth jobs program for flunkies who couldn’t get jobs anywhere else (and to help Bush pump his jobs numbers, which were abysmal). You kind of have to be a motivated fucking idiot to spend every day undermining the fourth amendment and acting like you’re doing a service to society. Especially with all the evidence of TSA agents using their authority to just outright steal shit. They’re not hiring the best, and everyone knows that they hire the worst of the worst for these jobs, so it’s hard to even call it “theater” anymore when everyone sees right through it. Hypernormalization.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

While you’re correct in your assessment, I’d like to remind people to not be assholes to TSA when they’re going through security. They’re people just trying to do their jobs like the rest of us. It’s a shit job with no recognition and a ton of public contact. The agents aren’t there because they want to stomp on your rights; they have bills to pay and people to take care of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Being assholes to them is irrational, they can be more of a nuisance to you than you can be to them. However I disagree people doing those jobs deserve any respect, doing evil because it’s a job and it pays and they can’t think of anything better… that doesn’t mean it suddenly becomes acceptable. The pawns don’t feel like they’re responsible for abuses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Sadly nothing Boeing has done is criminal in the US even though it absolutely should be.

I doubt that you know whether Boeing has or has not broken any laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

OK, well nothing there’s anything public about anyway. It’s always possible they’ve been embezzling or I don’t know, running a drug smuggling ring out of their warehouses, but nothing they’ve probably done is illegal. Remember this is all just a response to the multiple accidents related to manufacturing defects in their planes. At this moment the worst charge they’re looking at is maybe criminal negligence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Cover up is where I’d put money. Supplying a federal agency with falsified documents or otherwise lying would start getting into criminal territory. Though I agree that we, the public, have no evidence of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He didn’t say illegal, he said criminal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What is your point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They’re being investigated under “Conspiracy to Defraud the United States”, which does have criminal penalties.

Now, that’s a prison sentence of up to 5 years. People died because of the decisions by Boeing executives, and countless others were put at risk. There should be a whole lot more here that they should be charged with, but probably won’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The FAA and the DOJ are not the same as TSA. Not at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If someone bought off that the bolts were reinstalled they can get in trouble for falsifying inspection records.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

An enterprising DA should charge a corporation with murder under the personhood standard established by citizens united and go for the death penalty . Revoke their ability to exist in the state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
120 points

I assume Boeing’s response to this criminal inquiry will be a stock buyback.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Only after they lay off the subcontracted QA department

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

How else will their stock price go up amidst all this controversy lol.

Accountability should be held at the top. If they can benefit from cost cutting that can potentially kill people through negligence, they need to face criminal consequences for doing so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Not potentially.

MCAS did kill several hundred people just a few years ago.

A system Boeing put in place and snuck past regulators specifically to deploy a cheaply developed product that could compete with airbus.

The executives at Boeing already have blood on their hands. They should have faced manslaughter charges for the 2 flights that went down due to MCAS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No no no, this is all a 5D Chess move:

Make shit planes, stock falls like the planes

Buyback stocks, price rises

repeat

WAKE UP, SHEEPLANE!!!1

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Increase their lobbying budget too

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Oh Mr Oliver, thank you for imparting your wisdom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Slap on the wrist incoming

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Yeah thats about the extent of consequences for American corps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The CEO of Boeing is running for president!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Can’t be sued right now, he’s running for president…20 years later… still running for president…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Slap on the wrist? More likely they’ll get the Federal Legislature to send in another multi-billion dollar bail-out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not if they find a scapegoat.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 547K

    Comments