A new messaging app is in development, and the project is described as “an open source WhatsApp for the Fediverse.”

72 points

something something 15 competing standards

permalink
report
reply
22 points

unfortunately matrix sucks revolt isn’t federated and irc is outdated so

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I just learned about Matrix recently. Seems like something that’d be good. What sucks about it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Besides the main implementation synapse being slow, the new implementation dendrite is unfinished but progressing.

But technical standards aside, the hassle of managing encryption keys is too buggy and confusing IMO. That’ll deter most people I feel.

I want it to be great but it just isn’t there yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I personally really like Matrix, but there are a few outstanding complaints about it. The biggest one is that the reference implementation everyone uses by default is known to be bloated and slow, and poor at scaling. Server admins have had a huge challenge of supporting a large amount of data for things like room history, which in the past required propagation to every server hosting every participant. The protocol itself has been described by some developers as overtly complex.

Some of this seems to be improving, particularly with development of a Go-based backend implementation, Dendrite.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m not even close to an expert, but from what I have heard, matrix collects quite a bit of metadata depending on the server you are using/federating with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

IRC is only “outdated” if you make it so by using outdated networks like libera.chat that refuse to implement the newer standards that have been available for years.

Oh and XMPP is a thing and works great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

For some weird reason many people just plain ignore the existance of XMPP when they’re discussing decentralized protocols. Is it because Matrix outshadowed it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Feels like Jabber has been around for a long time. If I’m not mistaken I remember my buddy pimping it as an AIM alternative back in the Napster/mp3 days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

XMPP is fantastic, but I feel as though it suffers from half-baked clients, most of which are a decade old and look the part.

I’d really love to see a “modern” WhatsApp-like take on an XMPP messenger, but I haven’t found any. Admittedly, I haven’t looked in some time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Matrix is getting better on fast peace, we need to give it another yew years to fix biggest holes I guess.

ActivityPub based chat is going to suck much. Like basing chat on RSS or FTP, it can be done but why. Unless we’re talking just about replicating Instagram-like DMs then maybeee? But I still would like to just add link to Matrix in bio instead of having chat in yet another place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unless we’re talking just about replicating Instagram-like DMs

I think that’s exactly the niche this intends to fill. This is facebook messenger for the fediverse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Oh boy… Another messenger… Yay…

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Nobody is telling you to use it. This originally spun out of development of a messaging app just for Pixelfed, but evolved when the dev realized it could be made to work with any Fediverse account, not just his own server project.

An optimistic view is that it could end up opening the door for end-to-end encryption to come to private messages in Fediverse servers, over time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
9 points
*

I think what @deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml is trying to explain is that Mastodon and Lemmy for example may be able to implement Sup as a part of their softwares too. Currently if you try to DM someone on Lemmy, the options are a Matrix redirect, or Private Messages designated as not secured.

Though I do wonder about the viability of this. People would still need to set up with Sup to receive messages, at least as I understand it. As a result, this would run into a similar problem as matrix, just without needing to use a different federated server and login I suppose.

This would also require that project leads for AP softwares would want to accept the service as a part of their distribution, assuming it even is implmented in such a manner.

TL;DR it’s hard to say anything for certain when details seem to be slim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

With the open nature of the fediverse I actually see some potential here. Right now there isn’t a single messenger that I truly like. They’re all just different shades of okay or worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Matrix (element I guess)?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Doesn‘t quite have the userbase at least for me. I‘m only using it for one work contact and that’s it. I also heard from others who use Element a bit more that it’s quite buggy, although I haven’t experienced that myself yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What’s wrong with Signal?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Mobile-first, requires phone number, proprietary server-side, google play market.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Signal is great, but the core developer is inherently against federation with his own product. It’s just one giant centralized service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It feels like I’m doing shady backdoor deals. It’s only for the people I conspire with and really close friends…

In which we just end up using regular old sms anyway lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Signal is too darn secure. Much better to have one dude who probably knows how to use a crypto library build the whole thing over again with a coat of ActivityPub on top

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I wonder how it’ll compare to Matrix.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I think it’s intended to be more like WhatsApp, in the sense that you use it for one-on-one chats or messaging small friend groups. I don’t think it’s a current goal to try to take on Matrix / Element.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

use it for one-on-one chats or messaging small friend groups

Those are exactly what I use Matrix for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think it is to just replicate Instagram DMs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I’m for it, plus I like the name.

permalink
report
reply
19 points
*

What’s Sup?

Nothing much, you?

No, what’s, Sup?

… Just chillen…

Visible anger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

If I ever create my own messaging app, it’ll be called “updog”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What’s updog?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

’Who’s on first’ vibes :-)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Kinda shows how what’s up has evolved over the years

What’s up - WhatsApp sup - Sup

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The name makes me think of the Bro app from Silicon Valley

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Sup Bro?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nice CoC!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not hot dog

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fediverse

!fediverse@lemmy.ml

Create post

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of “federation” and “universe”.

Getting started on Fediverse;

Community stats

  • 1.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 772

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments