142 points

Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson

Its not just me right? This guy is insufferable. Like he got to take Carl Sagan’s seat but he has none of the humility that comes from the sense of awe that Sagan was able to inspire through his understanding of the universe.

permalink
report
reply
64 points

He just seems like a pompous asshole. The stories about his lectures and how much he charges don’t help at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

I try not to downplay the importance of science communication but NDT is an ass

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

He’s pompous af and like, regularly wrong. Which its like, bro you can carry the arrogance, but you have to be %100 all the time or you need to drop it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

He sees himself as a contrarian before anything else I think and never misses an opportunity to flount it

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I don’t get why it’s so popular to hate on him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I can’t speak for anyone else, but for me it’s the way I viewed him with hope and admiration, then later discovered he’s just yet one more self-obsessed asshole media personality. It’s rare anymore that I switch off the cynicism the world has beaten into me and allow myself to just assume the best about some media figure. And doing so leaves one vulnerable - finding out later that this was naive and foolish really hardens that cynicism. This stings in a way that just assuming he was a piece of shit from the start doesn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

To me he just sounds like a character from that show Big Bang Theory. I think he may come off wrong sometimes when he is trying to bring science into the discussion but everyone has bad days. I don’t think Carl Sagan would’ve held it against him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Its not a matter of popularity but a matter of how he conducts himself.

Here are about 20 examples: https://www.vice.com/en/article/5dmkgz/neil-degrasse-tysons-tweets-are-so-bad-and-he-needs-to-go-away

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

The writer of that article seems over the top angry about NDT’s tweets. Enough so that he titles the article “Neil Degrasse Tyson Shut The Fuck Up”.

Maybe its justified though, let’s look at some examples:

-NDT tweeted that “Marriage Story” should’ve been called “Divorce Story”.

-NDT tweeted chunks of asteroid in the movie Armageddon conveniently hit all the major cities of earth.

-NDT tweeted that the aliens in the movie Arrival would’ve had to write backwards to communicate.

…Seriously this doesn’t explain the hate for him. It just makes the writer seem like he has a chip on his shoulder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

All of those tweets just seem … Not worth reading? Like it’s either his opinion (feel free to share, whatever) or a fact, but not a very enlightening one. Just block him and move on.

I have a special dislike for mass audience “science” stuff but I recognize that people like it and just ignore it when I see it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

not reading it because I don’t give a fuck about Twitter. show me something real he’s done wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Lemmy/redditors hate the smell of their own brand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That one stung friend…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Stop for a second and really think about it.

Why would so many people hate a progressive scientifically minded black man on the internet?

Plenty of people act high and mighty on Twitter, plenty of public speakers charge for their appearances, it’s ridiculous how NGT gets singled out for it so much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yup. There’s some backlash against new atheism but ngt’s high crimes are sometimes being a bit awkward or pedantic and others like Richard Dawkins opine about how eugenics is unfairly maligned and Muslims are evil.

The degree of criticism and the bitch eating-crackers-tone of it all defs has a racial component.

He’s fine, he’s a famous rich dude. They’re all a bit annoying sometimes because power makes you weird but he doesn’t really hurt people, spew malice, or agitate for horrendous politics. He makes silly tweets about movie logic and explains cosmology to people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Revisit the thread and scroll down to find that picture of his tweets. People like to pile on other shit that bothers them but realistically, NDT is kind of a blowhard and a bit weird. His ackshewalley attitude doesn’t help either.

I’ve said it before, I found his conversation with god podcast episode to be in poor taste - sort of smarmy and condescending, and this is coming from an atheist. I’m sure there are plenty of racists that hate him for his skin color but not everyone has such easily dismissable reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think it mostly has to do with how dominant he has become in social media algorithms. Once he is in your feeds he doesn’t go away and he is everywhere. While most other Twitter twats are only on twitter.

But I think you still have a point. And again, I think the social media algorithm has a lot to do with it. His interview with Joe Rogan make him part of the rabbit hole that leads to all these right wing nutheads. I always try hard to get rid of Joe Rogan, Piers Morgan, and Jordan Peterson from my feeds. But whenever NGT pops up it only takes a while for them to reappear as well.

Which makes me believe he will appear in the feeds of people who do like this right wing content. And they probably will judge him harsher for being black.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t mind him on actual science shows and stuff he does there; but his online persona is just that of an insufferable, annoying, know-it-all Redditor. He wasn’t a douche like that the times I remember seeing him on Nova and other such programs. Only through his tweets and other social media interactions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

He really doesn’t even come close to filling Sagan’s shoes and we should find someone who can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
2 points

I was going to say Brian Cox but O’Dowd isn’t a bad choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

100%. That’s the perfect way of putting it too. Sagan seemed super humble and had a genuine state of wonder with with universe. NDT seems like an insufferable know it all douche who just likes publicity. Being a know it all seems antithetical to science.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah! It’s kinda the point of science to learn more and figure out more and more how little you know. You’re supposed to inspire people to learn the sciences. Not railroad them into believing scientists are all like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

As someone whose content specialization is Astronomy, I’ve always disliked Dr. Tyson as a public figure. I’ve always found him to be pretty pompous and patronizing with his explanations and descriptions. As you mention, he’s filling large shoes and lacks the the humility to handle it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I know right. NDT may be passionate about science, but the guy is way too far up his own backside to do what Sagan did… Narcissists aren’t inspiring to anyone but other narcissists, to the rest of they’re insufferable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I feel bad for Chuck, his co host on his podcast. He never misses an opportunity to remind him that he’s an “outsider” that’s only there for comic relief.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Chuck is in on it, he’s fine. He knows and plays into it. But he’s definitely not dumb. He can follow along with what Neil says just fine, even advanced topics that I can’t follow as someone very interested in science. I know he can because he rephrases what Neil says in his own words and Neil would go “Exactly!” or something to that effect.

The comic relief act is just that, an act, for comic relief, and it’s funny because it’s working in a meta type way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Besides, it’s that (rather annoying in my eyes) setup of the “outsider” who pretends to know nothing and the expert, where the “outsider” does this sort of interview and injects questions on behalf of the audience. Never liked that format because the questions tend to be super basic and obvious more often than not and feel orchestrated at times, but that’s what the podcast does. Many true crime podcasts do this as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Good. I like Chuck, lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ve never listened to the podcast but this seems so on brand for him.

Science isn’t a religion or cult. Its a process and literally just thinking and becoming informed allows you to be a part of that process. It doesn’t need gatekeepers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

You have to be able to accept evidence when it shows itself, at least until better evidence shows itself. That’s the hardest part about science.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Extremely insufferable… I stay far away from people like NDT in real life.

¡¡¡Actshully!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Just making sure you know the sub you’re in. But also, I get the impression you’re right regardless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

He honestly makes me less interested in science, he makes me feel that knowing too much stuff can make you dumber but he doesn’t even know that much he just talks like he does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
88 points

Wait until he brings up mirror kissing.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Weird

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Did you know that if you kiss a mirror, it’ll be on the lips?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You gotta be faster than the speed of light, then you can kiss yourself on the cheek in the mirror.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Interesting. Do you have any suggestions on how I can empower my narcissism?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

“How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren’t real?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He’s doing his best to give tips to the other narcissists out there - after all he learned from the best, himself

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Reposting content eh? Like we do here on lemmy? Unacceptable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s obviously OC so what are you talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

imagine saying something 5 times in 10 years lmao what a piece of shit /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m sure glad you put the sarcasm mark in there or I’d be really upset.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

unfortunately ya gotta nowdays 😭

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

For a joke y’all got super serious about this.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Ate the onion lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

People love to bandwagon hate. But honestly I gotta give credit to this one, it almost feels like something that could happen lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because it’s the normal way for that conversation to go?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nothing’s really “normal” for Neil Tyson

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nah, it’s just cuz Tysons an asshole. It’s good to remind people of that. No one’s taking the gag seriously.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Many people hate onions in their tuna salad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Right? Do people not know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

https://thehardtimes.net/about/

Satire, for those who didn’t catch on.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

We’re on theonion. Of course it’s satire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

My bad. I was letting myself be distracted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The issue is that NDT is an asshole, a pompous one at that.

Noone is eating the onion, everyone is just getting angry at the douche.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I didn’t know that he’s that way. I thought it was part of the satire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No, nowadays satire is almost a prediction for the reality.

I mean he would literally do this given the chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Twitter didn’t exist in Carl Sagan’s time, and he was just as critical of science fiction in movies.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I’ll be sure to forward that video to thehardtimes.net. Hopefully they’ll tease the ghost of Carl Sagan equally to settle any concerns of unfair treatment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The Hard Times is a very real punk news site that you should not question. Just absorb the information as truth and move on. The historic satire site was founded in December 1976. It’s made by a group of punk and hardcore kids from all the different sub-genres of the DIY hardcore scene. Any resemblance to actual persons or band names is coincidental.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Man I haven’t seen the Hard Times since I killed Facebook. I need to look them up again!

permalink
report
parent
reply

The Onion

!theonion@midwest.social

Create post

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

Community stats

  • 5.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 895

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments