203 points

What the fuck.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

The only appropriate response to have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points

During Supreme Court proceedings, HS. Phoolka, who represented the child advocacy groups, noted that Harish had constantly watched the video over the course of two years.

In case anyone thinks the ruling is actually about “accidental” downloads

permalink
report
reply
114 points

Yeah, it’s not even just a sensationalist headline. It’s what they ruled. How are we supposed to reconcile this with the rest of the world? I’m genuinely asking. How do you include a country with leadership like this in the future of the world? Someone enlighten me.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

A more important headline is that there currently are not laws in place to outlaw the possession and viewing of child pornography. It shouldn’t be up to the court to set a precedent of its illegality, but rather a clear law making it illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It seems there is an amendment in the POSCO act for this situation but somehow it is not being enforced properly. Maybe the amendment is poorly wordly¿? I am not a lawyer though so I might be wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

… In good company.

No trouble at all if everyone else is doing it. I mean, it’s not like only Epstein had an island…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
90 points
*

So let me get this straight. My county banned most of the popular porn sites because of the negative influence it can have on the populace but has such a poorly written and enforced law that people who possess and watch CSAM are deemed to be not breaking the law. What the actual fuck is going on here. This is a dangerous precedent being set here and I can only hope that supreme court overrules the case and holds the guy guilty.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

So, apparently the only porn allowed is featuring minors?

How the hell can they justify this

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Remember to vote against BJP. India has a beautiful culture and a lot of the Indian students I met in college were really amiable, thoughtful people, but BJP is ruining it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

Fucking India man I swear

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Fascism happened. That’s what.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Well Muslims there saw the shit coming way before 2020. But Hindus be like Heil Modi and world leaders applaud and can’t wait to do business

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You’re generalizing too much, so many Hindus have spoken against him and OTOH there are also Muslims like Shehla Rashid who became turncoats or have stayed silent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Saving Indian minorities is well below having a counterbalance to China on the Western priority list, unfortunately. Realpolitik strikes again.

If this goes far enough China could actually be easier to deal with, long-term. I hope they’ve thought of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Considering the prophet’s proclivities for 8 year olds, I thought this law would appease the muslims in India

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Calm down. Have some cow urine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

From the sacred chalice cowlice

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 272K

    Comments